Hi,
I am using a recent nightly of Solr 4 and have setup a simple SolrCloud cluster
of 2 shards without any replicas. If I send the 'optimize' command, then it is
executed on the shards one-by-one instead of in parallel.
Is this by design?How can I run optimize in parallel on all the shards?
Hi,
i've set it to AND, restarted tomcat, but in my search i get the same
results. So it seems that this don't have an effect.
Any ideas?
Ramo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2012 00:34
An: solr-user@lucene.apache
Otis,
if you have a bit of time to research, I think your document may look a lot
like the documents processed by:
http://langtech.jrc.it/
which is a flagship "multilingual technology" implementation and includes a
fair amount of entity disambiguation as far as I could hear in Ralph's ta
>Are you using a TrieDateField for the dates?
Yes
>Consider creating and re-using a filter for the keywords and let the
>query consist of the date range only.
In this case, do I have to configure any cache or solr's default
configurations are enough?
>Guessing here: You request all the results fr
I have wondered about this too but instead why not just set your cache
sizes large enough to house most/all of your documents and pre-warm
the caches accordingly? My bet is that a large enough document cache
may suffice but that's just a guess.
- Amit
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Kiran Jayak
The wiki should probably be updated.. maybe I'll take a stab at it.
I'll also try and update my article referenced there too.
When you checkout the project from SVN, do "ant eclipse"
Look at this bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3817) and
either run the ruby program or download the
This is great thanks for this post! I was curious about the same thing
and was wondering why "fl" couldn't return the "indexed"
representation of a field if that field were only indexed but not
stored. My thoughts were return something than nothing but I didn't
pay attention to the fact that gettin
I use the Solr 4.0-BETA version, my request url is
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*%3A*&rows=0&wt=xml&facet.pivot=cat,popularity,inStock&facet.pivot=popularity,cat&facet=true&facet.field=cat&facet.pivot.mincount=0
but I do not get any facet pivot info in the result
true
*:*
cat
Hi Chris,
Thanks for that tip, I checked and it is correctly because of the constraint
limit.
Thanks again
Dewi
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 12 September 2012 1:57 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Facet Sor
Sorry for not being clear.
Yes, I am trying to do a wildcard search for terms that contain a colon
in the text (ie: "foo:bar") in the filed list mentioned in the default
requesthandler that I posted earlier. Description is one of those
fields. Mpg is another field. I have not included the entir
I know fail over is available in solr4.0 right now, if one server
crashes,other servers also support query,I set up a solr cloud like this
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4007117/Selection_028.png
I use http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=*%3A*&wt=xml for query
at first, if t
I have three documents with the following search field (text_en type) values.
When I search for "Energy Field", I am getting the document in this order
presented. However if you look at the match, I would expect the Doc3 should
come first and Doc1 should be the last.
Doc1 : Automic Energy and
Eric,
"When you add a doc with the same unique key as an old doc,
the data associated with the first version of the doc is entirely
thrown away and its as though you'd never indexed it at all", I did exactly
the same. The old doc and new doc there is not a change except the Name has
changed. Whe
> The purpose of stored="true" is to store the raw string data
> besides the analyzed/transformed data for displaying
> purposes. This is fine for an analyzed solr.TextField, but
> for an StrField both values are the same. So is there any
> reason to apply stored="true" on a StrField as well?
If y
Hi All,
I am trying to run luke on my solr search index ( I have contributed 3-4 xml
files only).
when I try to open indexes in luke, I am getting write.lock error on index
and its not showing me index.
I did check "Force Unlock" option, but it didn't help either, I also tried
opening index unde
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:03 PM, wrote:
> The purpose of stored="true" is to store the raw string data besides the
> analyzed/transformed data for displaying purposes. This is fine for an
> analyzed solr.TextField, but for an StrField both values are the same. So is
> there any reason to apply
Hi,
I have a StrField to store an URL. The field definition looks like this:
Type "string" is defined as usual:
Then I realized that a StrField doesn't execute any analyzers and stored data
verbatim. The data is just a single token.
The purpose of stored="true" is to store the raw string dat
My standard question for such a situation: How are you expecting your users
to query this data? Are they expecting simple English/natural language text,
or are they expecting structured "identifiers" that can be keys into other
data sources.
For example, are your "entities" simple text literal
Perfect!
Many thanks
Sent from my HTC One™ X, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Ahmet Arslan"
To: ,
Subject: multiple filter queries and boolean operators in SolrJ
Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 6:36 PM
--- On Wed, 9/12/12, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
> From: Rajarshi Guha
>
fq's are always intersections, if you want to union multiple queries
you have to specify them in a single fq -- that's not a SolrJ/URL thing,
that's just a low level detail of how solr caches & intersects filters.
from SolrJ you just have to do a single addFilterQuery() call containing
your uni
--- On Wed, 9/12/12, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
> From: Rajarshi Guha
> Subject: multiple filter queries and boolean operators in SolrJ
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 12:58 AM
> Hi, I am accessing our Solr
> installation via SolrJ. Currently, we are
> suppor
> I'm using it that way, because I want to have an
> autocompletion list. Now
> I'm wondering if I can influence some of the results I'm
> getting. I have a
> lot of categories in my database. If I for example search
> for "iphone 3" I
> would expect to get all iphone 3 from the category
> electron
: Subject: What's the rules about contributing to Solr WIKI?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/#How_to_edit_this_Wiki
>> This Wiki is a collaborative site, anyone can contribute and share:
>>
>> Create an account by clicking the "Login" link at the top of any
>> page, and picking a username and pass
I just figured out how to run custom solr core with basic jetty under
Windows service with Apache procrun. Not quite a production setup and
most probably not perfect, but it might save somebody several hours
next time. I want to contribute that back to Solr WIKI for next
person.
Do I just wade in
Hi, I am accessing our Solr installation via SolrJ. Currently, we are
supporting filter queries via the addFilterQuery() method of
SolrQuery. However as far as I can see, the resultant documents that
come out of the query are the intersection of all the filters.
Ideally, what I'd like to happen is
As Michael hinted, I believe RDF would be the de-factor answer.
Within it, things such as OWL or SKOS certainly represent classical formats.
Processors such as OWLAPI can go pretty far there.
As Péter hinted, schema.org might provide a way to complement an existing XML
with semantic information.
Hi,
i'm using solr 3.5 with the following configuration:
I'm using it that way, because I want to have an autocompletion list. Now
I'm wondering if I can influence some of the results I'm getting. I have a
l
Is it possible that you may have indexed with an earlier pattern, changed
the pattern, and then tried to query? If so, you need to fully re-index to
see the change take effect.
I don't know of anything in solrconfig that should affect
PatternTokenizerFactory.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original
Hi,
I guess the most common format today is using the schema.org's ontologies.
It provides a couple of definitions, and it is supported by big players,
such as Google, Yahoo, Microsoft. See http://schema.org/.
Hope it helps,
Péter
wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > If I'm extracting named entities, top
Hi Jack,
This is happening on only lucid cloud server not splitting comma separated
value. but on solr server this fix is working perfectly.
Is any configuration changes in solrconfig.xml which can enable and disable
PatternTokenizerFactory?
-
Regards,
Suneel Pandey
Sr. Software Developer
I tried your field type in Solr 4.0-BETA and it works fine for input such
as:
cat,dog|fox,bat|frog
What do you see when you use the Solr Admin Analysis web page for that text
for your field type?
I would note that your pattern does not permit spaces as delimiters or after
delimiters, so if
Thanks for the answer Erick.
thaihai
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-vs-SolrReplication-tp4006327p4007019.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Thank you for the reply and help. The description field is part of the
: defaultHandler's eDisMax search list (qf):
...
: Similar queries for other escaped characters in "description" using term
: search return correctly as shown from the logs correctly.
Ok ... but you haven't really a
: I'd still love to see a query lifecycle flowchart, but, in case it
: helps any future users or in case this is still incorrect, here's how
: I'm tackling this:
part of the problem is deciding what you mean by "lifecycle" - as far as
the SolrCore is concerned, the lifecycle of hte request is it
Hello ,
I am using following field type for comma separated value but it is not
working.
Please suggested what i did wrong.
-
Regards,
Suneel Pandey
Sr. Software Developer
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/PatternTokenizer
You've outlined the possibilities pretty well. I don't think you
want a custom analyzer though, consider a custom UpdateHandler
and overriding the addDoc command. You can freely manipulate
the document at this point, adding or removing fields etc. So see
if the incoming doc has your original field
I'm probably a little unclear about the breadth of what you want to
do, but I would recommend DC at the extremely lightweight end, and TEI
at the very heavyweight end. Perhaps you could come up with a mashup
of DC and your own fields in RDF as well.
Michael Della Bitta
---
: I did the query twice, once with the sorting and once without the sort:
:
: 1. Without f.a.facet.sort=index : I have all l1, l2, l3 in count order
: (all l1, l2, and l3 facets have counts on them)
:
: 2. With f.a.facet.sort=index : The facet is sorted accordingly
: "l1:..","l2:.." but "l3"
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 14:21 +0200, Claudio Ranieri wrote:
> Ok Toke, Is it worth opening a ticket in jira to implement the
> collator-key + original in facet?
I think it would be best to discuss it on the developer mailing list
first. I have send a mail there: "Collator-based facet sorting in Solr
Hi,
We are trying to run solr on https, these are few of the issues or problems
that are coming up. Just wanted to understand if anyone else is facing these
problems,
we have some shards running on https, but in shards parameter in solr we don't
specify the protocol, how can we achieve thisWil
Hoss,
After investigating more, here is the tomcat log herebelow. It is indeed
the same problem: "exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2,".
It is an indexing box and the comment says that we could rise this number
to 4 or something. I can do that but I have four questions though:
- is it someth
Generally, source folders come in pairs - "java" for the actual code source,
and "test" for the unit tests. So, make sure that "/test" appears in the
source folder name. And unit test file names either begin or end with
"Test".
If you right click on a unit test and select "Run As", you should
> This is an interesting feature to be implemented, because we
> can sort the results correctly, but not in the facets.
> The facets also does not bring the total count for
> pagination.
> I'm using the facets to get the distinct values of a
> field. I wish to sort and pagination them.
Distinct
The "branch" will be the source for the next release (3.6.2), if there is
one. To get the exact source for a release, go to "tags" rather than
"branches". Use:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_3_6_1/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mechravi25
Sent:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:43 PM, mechravi25 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know the base lined version of Solr 3.6.1 Source code for
> svn Check out. We tried to check out from the following link and found many
> base lined versions related to Solr 3.6.x version.
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos
Hi,
I would like to know the base lined version of Solr 3.6.1 Source code for
svn Check out. We tried to check out from the following link and found many
base lined versions related to Solr 3.6.x version.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/
Can anyone tell me the exact svn chec
Ok Toke,
Is it worth opening a ticket in jira to implement the collator-key + original
in facet?
-Mensagem original-
De: Toke Eskildsen [mailto:t...@statsbiblioteket.dk]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 11 de setembro de 2012 08:46
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: Pr
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 12:14 +0200, Claudio Ranieri wrote:
> This is an interesting feature to be implemented, because we can sort
> the results correctly, but not in the facets.
At work (State and University Library, Denmark) we use collator-ordered
faceting for author & title, but out current imp
Assuming a multivalued, stored and indexed field with name "comment".
When performing a search, I would like to return only the values of
"comment" which contain the match. For example:
When searching for "gold" instead of getting this result:
Theres a lady whos sure
all that
Hi,
Thanks for all the suggestions :-)
Seems like denormalization is the way to go to do this without losing
scalability and speed.
BlockJoins seems so solve another requirement I have, and that is for the
parent-child relationship between for instance an email and email
attachments. This relati
Ok Toke.
Thanks for your explanation.
This is an interesting feature to be implemented, because we can sort the
results correctly, but not in the facets.
The facets also does not bring the total count for pagination.
I'm using the facets to get the distinct values of a field. I wish to sort
and
Hello,
I have some question about restoring from a snapshot backup. I have a master
and do the following command:
http://solr.test.uk:/solr/replication?command=backup
It created a directory in my data directory: snapshot.20120911224532
When i want to use this backup on master i replace the
feedback to patch:
I used build #85 (Revision: 1382192) to test the same use case (build up
an initial index of 18 Mio and run updates with around 200.000 documents)
result: the use of fq to drill down facets is now consistent! (available
under http://sb-tp1.swissbib.unibas.ch)
Thanks for pr
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 16:04 +0200, Claudio Ranieri wrote:
> When I used the CollationKeyFilterFactory in my facet (example below),
> the value of facet went wrong. When I remove the
> CollationKeyFilterFactory of type of facet, the value went correct.
As Ahmed wrote, CollationKeyFilter is meant fo
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 08:00 +0200, Amey Patil wrote:
> Our solr index (Solr 3.4) has over 100 million docuemnts.
[...]
> *((keyword1 AND keyword2...) OR (keyword3 AND keyword4...) OR ...) AND
> date:[date1 TO *]*
> No. of keywords can be in the range of 100 - 1000.
> We are adding sort parameter *'
55 matches
Mail list logo
