: I was wondering if anybody has run into this issue before. Solr is not
: returing any search results for word that contain colon ( : ) in it
: when we perform a term search containing colon. We do escape this
: correctly, I believe as shown in the sample (taken from tomcat logs)
...
:
All,
I was wondering if anybody has run into this issue before. Solr is not
returing any search results for word that contain colon ( : ) in it
when we perform a term search containing colon. We do escape this
correctly, I believe as shown in the sample (taken from tomcat logs)
Sep 06, 2012
Since Edge N-gram tokens are a subset of N-gram tokens, I was wondering if
I could be a bit more space efficient.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> I think your thought about using the edge ngram as a field and
> boosting that field in the qf/pf sections of the dismax handler
I think your thought about using the edge ngram as a field and
boosting that field in the qf/pf sections of the dismax handler sounds
reasonable. Why do you have qualms about it?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Kiran Jayakumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to score documents with a match "earl
Hi,
We've seen this too on one of the test nodes yesterday, it ran on a build of a
few days old. The node receiving documents complained it could not forward them
to the fifth node and returned a 503. The fifth node itself only logged a NPE
and the 503, nothing more, no stack traces.
There was
On 9/6/2012 6:54 PM, kiran chitturi wrote:
The error i am getting is 'org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid
Date String: '1345743552'.
I think it was being saved as a string in DB, so i will use the
DateFormatTransformer.
To go along with all the other replies that you have gotten:
: I am not edismax=true as a flag actually does anything (Solr4 beta):
Alexandre: You are 100% correct, this appears to be a bug in the Admin
UI. Thank you for reporting it...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3811
-Hoss
Hello,
I am not edismax=true as a flag actually does anything (Solr4 beta):
'responseHeader'=>{
'status'=>0,
'QTime'=>1,
'params'=>{
'debugQuery'=>'true',
'indent'=>'true',
'edismax'=>'true',
'q'=>'text',
'qf'=>'TitleEN DescEN',
'wt'=>'ruby',
: I get sometimes (not often):
: SolrException e where e.code() ==
: SolrException.ErrorCode.SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE.code
Are there any errors in your solr server logs?
Are you using the DistributedUpdateProcessor (ie: SolrCloud) ?
There aren't many places in Solr that will throw a 503 status cod
Thanks Robert,
>>if not, just customize blocktree's params with a CodecFactory in solr,
>>or even pick another implementation (FixedGap, VariableGap, whatever).
Still trying to get my head around 4.0 and flexible indexing. I'll take
another look at Mike's and your presentations. I'm trying to f
: > When i index a text field which has arabic and English like this tweet
: > “@anaga3an: هو سعد الحريري بيعمل ايه غير تحديد الدوجلاس ويختار الكرافته ؟؟”
: > #gcc #ksa #lebanon #syria #kuwait #egypt #سوريا
: > with field_type as 'text_ar' and when i try to see the same field again in
: > solr, it
yes..I do have this uniquekey defined properly.
id
Before the schema change...
After the schema change...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-search-not-working-after-copying-a-new-field-to-an-existing-Indexed-Field-tp4005993p4006217.html
Sent f
Do you have the unique key set up in your schema.xml ? It should be
automatic if you have the ID field and define it as the unique key.
ID
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Mani wrote:
> I have a made a schema change to copy an existing field "name" (Source
> Field)
> to an existing search fiel
Thank you.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : gpg: Signature made 08/06/12 19:52:21 Pacific Daylight Time using RSA key
> : ID 322
> : D7ECA
> : gpg: Good signature from "Robert Muir (Code Signing Key) <
> rm...@apache.org>"
> : *gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified w
Thank you Erick. I think #2 is the best for me because I have more than
hundred fields & dont want to construct a huge query each time.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Try using edismax to distribute the search across the fields rather
> than using the catch-all field. The
Hello,
Using "package org.apache.solr.client.solrj;"
when I do:
UpdateResponse ur = solrServer.commit(false, false);
I get sometimes (not often):
SolrException e where e.code() ==
SolrException.ErrorCode.SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE.code
When I catch this exception, I try to commit again, the call d
> Why would you store the actual images in SOLR?
No, the images are files on the filesystem. Only the path to the image should
be stored in Solr.
> And you are most likely looking at dynamic fields as the solution
>
> 1) Define *_Path, *_Size, *_Alt as a dynamic field with appropriate types
> 2
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
> Thanks Robert,
>
> I'll have to spend some time understanding the default codec for Solr 4.0.
> Did I miss something in the changes file?
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/
see the file formats section, especially
http://lucene.apac
Hello,
I have a bunch of documents that I would like to index on a local
server behind the firewall. But then, the actual search will happen on
a public infrastructure (Amazon, etc). The documents themselves are
not quite public, so I want just the index content (indexed, not
stored) being availab
If you have time, you might as well wait for 4.0 to be released otherwise
3.6.1
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Version-Migration-from-solr-1-3-tp4006193p4006200.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Robert,
I'll have to spend some time understanding the default codec for Solr 4.0.
Did I miss something in the changes file?
I'll be digging into the default codec docs and testing sometime in next
week or two (with a 2 billion term index) If I understand it well enough,
I'll be happy t
I see that 4.0 alpha has been release after 3.6.1 , so should I look at
3.5 as the most stable release currently?
Version Source :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversions-panel
Regards
Sujatha
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Su
Why would you store the actual images in SOLR? There is no way to
really search the bytes of image, is there? What you probably want to
do is extract all searchable metadata out of that image, name, alt,
EXIF, etc.
And you are most likely looking at dynamic fields as the solution
1) Define *_Path
My problem is more like the left hand side of the equatation.
Is it ${f.name} or something?
On Sep 7, 2012 5:36 PM, "Rafał Kuć-3 [via Lucene]" <
ml-node+s472066n4006179...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> You can just pass the name of the file to the 'literal' parameter. For
> example adding
>
Hi Tom: I already enhanced the javadocs about this for Lucene, putting
warnings everywhere in bold:
NOTE: This parameter does not apply to all PostingsFormat
implementations, including the default one in this release. It only
makes sense for term indexes that are implemented as a fixed gap
between
Hi,
I want to create a Solr index of articles. Each article should have a title,
content, published date and an arbitrary number of images attached to. An
article could look like this:
title: An article about Foo and Bar
content: This is some text about Foo and Bar.
published: 2012.09.07T
Hello all,
Due to multiple languages and dirty OCR, our indexes have over 2 billion
unique terms (
http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs/large-scale-search/too-many-words-again).
In Solr 3.6 and previous we needed to reduce the memory used for storing
the in-memory representation of the tii file. We o
Hello!
You can just pass the name of the file to the 'literal' parameter. For
example adding
literal.filename=my_file.csv
would set the 'filename' field of your document with the value of
'my_file.csv'.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Elastic
Thx for the quick answer.
Can you help a little more? I don't really got the concept of literal.
How can I set a field with the source absolute path?
I mean how can I find out the parameter names?
An example will be really help full.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
The above does not look right - you probably would want
/usr/solr/example/solr for your solrhome based on other info you give.
You also reference /usr/solr/data/conf as your conf folder, but I'd
expect it to be something like /usr/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf
-DhostPort=8080" #mi
Hello!
In Solr 4.0 you will have the ability to add arbitrary field along
with all documents from a single file -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateCSV#literal
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> Hi!
> I've have a set of CSV file
Hi!
I've have a set of CSV files. I wanted to index them by certain columns. But
I also want to store the filename, where they got indexed from.
The reason is, that the queries I want to run is to identify files.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index
You can use the Solr admin "analysis" web page to enter a term or even a
passage of text and see how it would be analyzed/indexed for any specified
field or field type.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Bill_78
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.a
Change your data-config.xml connection XML to this:
Then try again. This keeps the driver from trying to fetch the entire
result set at the same time.
cheers,
Travis
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:17 AM, deniz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been trying to index my data from mysql db, but somehow
May be you can take a look at Crawl-Anywhere which have administration
web interface, solr indexer and search web application.
www.crawl-anywhere.com
Regards.
Dominique
Le 05/09/12 17:05, Lochschmied, Alexander a écrit :
This may be a bit off topic: How do you index an existing website and c
Dear all,
Similar subjects about index data have already been post, but I would like
your advise.
I use solr analysers to process fields, like synonyms, stopwords, ... and I
cannot see the result without using a special tool (like LukeRequestHandler
for example).
I would like to copy the index
Thank the guys who actually fixed it!
Thanks for bringing this up, and please let us know if Yonik's patch fixes
your problem
Best
Erick
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, guenter.hip...@unibas.ch
wrote:
> Erick, thanks for response!
> Our use case is very straight forward and basic.
> - no c
Hi,
I have the same issue using solr 4.0-ALPHA.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/groups-limit-0-in-sharding-core-results-in-IllegalArgumentException-tp4006086p4006110.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> A "trie" field probably doesn't work properly, as it indexes multiple terms
>> per value and you'd get odd values.
>
> I don't know about pivot faceting, but all of the other types of
> f
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> Just to be clear, as I'm not logged onto the dev server at the moment
>> but it was implied in an earlier mail: Any field that is to be pivoted
>> on needs to be a string field? Is that documented, as I cannot find
>> that in the docs.
>
> No,
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> A "trie" field probably doesn't work properly, as it indexes multiple terms
> per value and you'd get odd values.
I don't know about pivot faceting, but all of the other types of
faceting take this into account (hence faceting works fine on t
On Sep 7, 2012, at 09:29 , Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>> Ranges won't work at all pivots are purely by individual term currently.
>>
>> If you want to pivot by ranges, and you can define those ranges during
>> indexing, then you could make a
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Ranges won't work at all pivots are purely by individual term currently.
>
> If you want to pivot by ranges, and you can define those ranges during
> indexing, then you could make a field that represented which range each
> document is i
Thank you. I can confirm that moving to Beta has made that problem go away.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all
at once. Lately, it doesn't see
On Sep 7, 2012, at 08:36 , Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> Pivot facets currently only work with individual terms, not ranges.
>>
>> The response you provided does look odd in that there are duplicate
>> timestamps listed, but pivots were only imple
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Pivot facets currently only work with individual terms, not ranges.
>
> The response you provided does look odd in that there are duplicate
> timestamps listed, but pivots were only implemented for textual (string being
> the most common typ
It works indeed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3808
-Original message-
> From:Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Fri 07-Sep-2012 10:40
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Is Boilerpipe usable through Solr ExtractingUpdateHandler or the
> DIH?
>
> Hi,
>
> It should not b
Hi,
If like most people you have application server(s) in front of solr,
the simplest and most secure option is to bind solr to a local address
(192.168.* or 10.0.0.*). The app server talks to solr via the local
(a.k.a blackhole) ip address that no-one from outside can ever access
as it's not rout
Estaré ausente de la oficina desde el Vie 07/09/2012 y no volveré hasta el
Jue 20/09/2012 .
Responderé a su mensaje cuando regrese.
Pivot facets currently only work with individual terms, not ranges.
The response you provided does look odd in that there are duplicate timestamps
listed, but pivots were only implemented for textual (string being the most
common type) fields initially.
Erik
On Sep 6, 2012, at 19:04 ,
Hi,
Im using solr 3.6.1 version. I have kept corex as the common core i.e. I ve
used the sharding concept on this core to get the indexed data from all the
other cores.
Here, If i use grouping with groups.limit=0, its resulting in the following
exception
numHits must be > 0; please use TotalHit
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:50:58AM +0200, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Erick,
>
> I think that should be described differently...
> You need to set-up protected access for some paths.
> /update is one of them.
> And you could make this protected at the jetty level or using Apache proxies
> and rewrite
Hi,
It should not be so hard but it looks like the current SolrContentHandler
builds up the document via SAX-events. You could pass a
BoilerpipeContentHandler((ContentHandler)parsingHandler, BoilerpipeExtractor)
to the parser in ExtractingDocumentLoader.java. It should work.
Markus
-O
Hi all,
I have been trying to index my data from mysql db, but somehow i cant index
anything, and dont see any exception / error in logs, except a warning which
is highlighted below...
Here is my db-config's connection string:
(I can connect to the db from command line by using the above sett
54 matches
Mail list logo
