Thank you. I can confirm that moving to Beta has made that problem go away.

Regards,
   Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all
at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD
book)


On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com> wrote:
> The fix in edismax was made just a few days (6/28) before the formal
> announcement of 4.0-ALPHA (7/3), but unfortunately the fix came a few days
> after the cutoff for 4.0-ALPHA (6/25).
>
> See:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3467
>
> (That issue should probably be annotated to indicate that it "affects"
> 4.0-ALPHA.)
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:13 AM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0alpha: edismax complaints on certain characters
>
> I am on 4.0 alpha. Maybe it was fixed in beta. But I am most
> definitely seeing this in edismax. If I get rid of / and use
> debugQuery, I get:
> 'responseHeader'=>{
>    'status'=>0,
>    'QTime'=>14,
>    'params'=>{
>      'debugQuery'=>'true',
>      'indent'=>'true',
>      'q'=>'foobar',
>      'qf'=>'TitleEN DescEN',
>      'wt'=>'ruby',
>      'defType'=>'edismax'}},
>  'response'=>{'numFound'=>0,'start'=>0,'docs'=>[]
>  },
>  'debug'=>{
>    'rawquerystring'=>'foobar',
>    'querystring'=>'foobar',
>    'parsedquery'=>'(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((DescEN:foobar |
> TitleEN:foobar)))/no_coord',
>    'parsedquery_toString'=>'+(DescEN:foobar | TitleEN:foobar)',
>    'explain'=>{},
>    'QParser'=>'ExtendedDismaxQParser',
> ....
>
> I'll check beta on my machine by tomorrow.
>
> Regards,
>   Alex.
>
> Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all
> at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD
> book)
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> That's what I was thinking, but when I tried foo/bar in Solr 3.6 and
>> 4.0-BETA it was working fine - it split the term and generated the proper
>> query without any error.
>>
>> I think the problem is if you use the default Lucene query parser, not
>> edismax. I removed &defType==edismax from my query request and the problem
>> reproduces.
>>
>> My two test queries:
>>
>> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?debugQuery=true&defType=edismax&qf=features&q=foo/bar
>> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?debugQuery=true&df=features&q=foo/bar
>>
>> The first works; the second fails as reported (in 4.0-BETA, but works in
>> 3.6).
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Yonik Seeley
>> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 9:53 AM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0alpha: edismax complaints on certain characters
>>
>>
>> I believe this is caused by the regex support in
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039
>>
>> It certainly seems wrong to interpret a slash in the middle of the
>> word as the start of a regex, so I've reopened the issue.
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://lucidworks.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
>> <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that edismax was supposed to be crash proof
>>> and just ignore bad syntax. But I am either misconfiguring it or hit a
>>> weird bug. I basically searched for text containing '/' and got this:
>>>
>>> {
>>>   'responseHeader'=>{
>>>     'status'=>400,
>>>     'QTime'=>9,
>>>     'params'=>{
>>>       'qf'=>'TitleEN DescEN',
>>>       'indent'=>'true',
>>>       'wt'=>'ruby',
>>>       'q'=>'foo/bar',
>>>       'defType'=>'edismax'}},
>>>   'error'=>{
>>>     'msg'=>'org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.ParseException:
>>> Cannot parse \'foo/bar \': Lexical error at line 1, column 9.
>>> Encountered: <EOF> after : "/bar "',
>>>     'code'=>400}}
>>>
>>> Is that normal? If it is, is there a known list of characters I need
>>> to escape or do I just have to catch the exception and tell user to
>>> not do this again?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>    Alex.
>>>
>>> Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
>>> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all
>>> at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working.  (Anonymous  - via GTD
>>> book)
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to