I send email to :solr-user@lucene.apache.org, but I always receive the rejected
email. It can't send successful.
Hello,
Have you tried jdk 6 from Oracle?
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:41 AM, randolf.julian <
randolf.jul...@dominionenterprises.com> wrote:
> I am trying to use the data import handler to update SOLR index with Oracle
> data. In the SOLR schema, a dynamic field called PHOTO_* has been defined.
> I
Hi,
I wanted to know whether it is feasible to query on all the shards even if
the query yields data only from a few shards n not all. Or is it better to
mention those shards explicitly from which we get the data and only query
on them.
for example :
I have 4 shards. Now I have a query which yiel
: Ok, so my issue is that it must be a flat structure. Why isn't the JSON
: parser able to deconstruct the object into a flatter structure for indexing?
: Shouldn't it be able to take any valid JSON structure?
Becuase no one has contributed code to do it?
In general accepting any arbitrary JSON
: I have a custom component which depends on the ordering of a
: multi-valued parameter. Unfortunately it looks like the values do not
: come back in the same order as they were put in the URL. Here is some
: code to explain the behavior:
...
: and I notice that the values are ordered d
Sorry if this is documented somewhere but I did searched a lot and couldn't
find the answer to this.
I'd like to be able to type in test queries and the /admin page but when I
do the url string created is url-encoded so that the resulting string
doesn't work.
If I type:
TEST&qf=t_FIELD_NAME
in
Hi folks,
Is there a way to configure Solr master -failure using Zookeoper?
Any experiences...
Ankit
Hi Erick, Dimitry and Mikhail
thank you all for your time. I tried all of the suggestions below and am happy
to report that indexing speeds have improved. There were several confounding
problems including
- a bank of (~20) regexes that were poorly optimized and compiled at each
indexing step
-
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:48 PM, vybe3142 wrote:
> Thanks for the response
>
> No, the file is plain text.
>
> All I'm trying to do is index plain ASCII text files via a remote reference
> to their file paths.
The XML update handler expects a specific format of XML.
The json, CSV, javabin update
BTW, .. using the client I pasted, I get the same error even with the
standard supplied executable SOLR jar.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Is-there-a-way-for-SOLR-SOLRJ-to-index-files-directly-bypassing-HTTP-streaming-tp3833419p3840483.html
Sent from the Solr
Thanks for the response
No, the file is plain text.
All I'm trying to do is index plain ASCII text files via a remote reference
to their file paths.
I guess what I need to do is specify the content type as text. I don't think
a "content-type" param will help since this behavior is tied to the
The size of the index does matter practically speaking.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
> Exactly. That's what I mean.
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>
>> Mikhail,
>>
>> Thanks for the response. Just to be clear
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:38 PM, vybe3142 wrote:
> Okay, I added the javabin handler snippet to the solrconfig.xml file
> (actually shared across all cores). I got further (the request made it past
> tomcat and into SOLR) but haven't quite succeeded yet.
>
> Server trace:
> Mar 19, 2012 3:31:35
I see your point.
If I understand it correct it will however mean that i need to return
10(brands)x100(resultToShow) = 1000 docs to facilitate that all 100 results
to show is of the same brand. Correnct?
And tomorrow (or later) the customer will also want a facet on 5 new fields
eg. "production y
Well, it depends on how many groups we're talking here. Grouping
returns the top N results _within_ each group. So if you have 10
brands and grouped on brand, you'd get back the top, say, 3 results
for Ford, Volvo, Fiat, Saab, Audi.up to 10 groups.
The number of groups you get back is governed
Thanks for the suggestion Martijn.
I did see that v. 4 had a group.facet parameter that seems to fit my needs.
But since I'm new to Solr I'm not really comfortable using version 4 in
production, let alone a nightly build.
Any other ideas? - I cant imagine that i'm the first person ever trying to
Thanks for your reply Erick,
As far as I can see grouping on brand (group.field=brand) will only work if
all rows are returned. Correct?
- if this is so it will not fly since only the top results are returned
(rows=100)
Or am I missing something.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http:
Okay, I added the javabin handler snippet to the solrconfig.xml file
(actually shared across all cores). I got further (the request made it past
tomcat and into SOLR) but haven't quite succeeded yet.
Server trace:
Mar 19, 2012 3:31:35 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [testcore1] we
Did you remove the entire contents of the prod index before
copying from the dev box? This should work fine
Best
Erick
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:48 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have copied solr's data folder from dev linux box to prod one. When
> starting solr I get this error in prod server.
Faceting and sorting are the two biggest places people get into trouble.
You've been asking questions about Solr Cloud, so I assume you're
working on a trunk release. Note that most everything people know
about memory consumption painfully gained over the years is...wrong
on trunk.
Or at least may
My guess is that this isn't defined in the solrconfig.xml file
for your testcore1/conf..
If you modeled your testcore1 after the solrconfig.xml files in the
example/multicore/core* directories, these are extremely simplified.
You might try copying the one from example/solr/conf and removing
s
Still No luck.Please help point out what I'm doing wrong. Neither the
(commented out ) first approach (including the content with the request) nor
the 2nd approach seem to work. Nothing seems to be acknowledged at the
tomcat server either. I get the error:
Starting SOLR doc indexing client 2
Exc
I am not currently running into memory issues, but I was wondering if
anyone could explain to me Solrs memory usage? What does Solr
actually store in memory? What are some of the largest memory
consumers (i.e. faceting, sorting, etc). Is the best way to start
addressing questions like this to ju
Hello,
I have copied solr's data folder from dev linux box to prod one. When starting
solr I get this error in prod server. In dev solr starts sucessfully.
Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException:
/home/apache-solr-3.5.0/example/solr/data/index/segments_u (No such file or
directory)
Exactly. That's what I mean.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> Thanks for the response. Just to be clear you're saying that the size
> of the index does not matter, it's more the size of the results?
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
> wro
Thanks! I look at the api carefully before, but not very sure.
So,it seems that the highlighter might not be helpful.
I am considering alternative solution for this problem.
I would like to what exactly want, for instance I got a candidate record
from my query:RVCES(I implement a 5 gram index)
MSA
Thanks a lot, I'll read it :) It seems to be helpfull
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>> Is there any possibility to boost
>> terms during indexing? Searching
>> that using google I found information that there is no such
>> feature in
>> Solr (we can only boost fields). Is
I just read the edismax pf functionality and it covers all my needs.
Many thanks :)
2012/3/19 Samuel García Martínez
> Hi all, i have a question about boosting a given doc based on query terms
> proximity.
>
> *query*: dog food*doc1*: "my dog eat food"*doc2*: "i have purchased the dog
> food o
Hi all, i have a question about boosting a given doc based on query terms
proximity.
*query*: dog food*doc1*: "my dog eat food"*doc2*: "i have purchased
the dog food on amazon paying with paypal"
Current scoring tf/idf algorithm scores higher doc1 because length
normalization.
Is there any metho
Hi Rasmus,
You might want to use the group.facet parameter:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing#Request_Parameters
I think that will give you the right facet counts with faceting. The
parameter is not available in Solr 3.x, so you'll need to use a 4.0 nightly
build.
Martijn
On 19 March
Hi:
I am trying to index a collection of SolrInputDocs to a Solr server. I was
wondering if the call I make to add the documents (the
add(Collection) call ) is a blocking function call ?
I would also like to know if the add call is a call that would take longer for
a larger collection of do
Hello,
For our search system we'd like to be able to process merged tokens (sorry,
I don't know what's the proper name for this), i.e. when a user enters a
query like "hotelsin barcelona", we'd like to know that the user means
"hotels in barcelona".
At some point in the past we implemented this k
I use the same version of solr and solrJ.
I try version3.3.0 and version 3.5.0, but I get the same error.
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "Tomás Fernández L�";
发送时间: 2012年3月19日(星期一) 晚上7:19
收件人: "solr-user";
主题: Re: Invalid version (expected 2, but 60) or the data
Hi All,
I wonder if anyone else has had a requirement similar to this:
I'm using MLT handler to return matching documents, matched on a specific
field which works perfectly. But I want to be able to show which
interesting terms matched for a given result set. If there was a way of
listing these
Mikhail,
Thanks for the response. Just to be clear you're saying that the size
of the index does not matter, it's more the size of the results?
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Frankly speaking the computational complexity of Lucene search depends from
> siz
I use the same version of server(solr) and client(solrJ).
I try the version3.3.0 and version3.5.0, but get the same error.
-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "Tomás Fernández L�";
发送时间: 2012年3月19日(星期一) 晚上7:19
收件人: "solr-user";
主题: Re: Invalid version (expected 2, but
Don't highlight on it. As Chris pointed out, it's the_highlighting_
that builds this ginormous clause. Just something like _searching_
on text:* has short-circuits in the code that refrain from this
expansion.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> true. but how can
Hey iorixxx,
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrJ-Size-of-solr-Results-tp3838555p3838877.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
true. but how can you find documents containing that field without expanding
1000 clauses?
--- Original Message ---
On 3/19/2012 07:24 AM Erick Erickson wrote:bq: So all I want to do is a simple
"all docs with something in this field,
and to highlight the field"
But that doesn't reall
Groups and faceting are orthogonal and really have nothing to do with
each other, so that might be where part of the problem lies.
In your example, you can consider grouping by brand and count the
*groups* returned, not elements within those groups. Then you're
simply counting up the groups return
bq: So all I want to do is a simple "all docs with something in this field,
and to highlight the field"
But that doesn't really make sense to do at the Solr/Lucene level. All
you're saying is that you want that field highlighted. Wouldn't it be much
easier to just do this at the app level whenever
> Does the hightlight can provide the
> exact position of the query
> For instance:
> MSAQLRKPTA*RVCES*CGRAEHWDDDLEAWQIARTDGTKQVGSPHCLHEWDINGNFNPVAMDD
> I want to know the Position of "R" in the highlight token.
> I want to do the secondary query based on the position,
There is an unresolved jira
> QueryResponse rsp = solrServer.query( query );
> SolrDocumentList docs = rsp.getResults();
>
> here i am getting docs.size() is 100 how can i change the
> size. or is there
> any other way to iterate docs above 100. i am stucked here.
By rows and start parameter. query.setStart(0); query.setRo
Hi All,
QueryResponse rsp = solrServer.query( query );
SolrDocumentList docs = rsp.getResults();
here i am getting docs.size() is 100 how can i change the size. or is there
any other way to iterate docs above 100. i am stucked here.
Thanks,
myauu
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4
I have an index that contains variants of cars. In this small sample I have 2
car models (Audi and Volvo) and the Audi is available in black or white,
whereas the Volvo is only available in black.
On the search page I want to display products not variants - in this test case
2 products should b
Hi,
Thanks this works!
I also yesterday try to make new instance of SOLR and I find bug in my
configuration.
When i copied files to SOLR_HOME/../dist/ and also i input in configuration
directive to contrib they have some collision.
My configuration now is SOLR_HOME//conf/solrconfig.xml:
I have an index that contains variants of cars. In this small sample I have 2
car models (Audi and Volvo) and the Audi is available in black or white,
whereas the Volvo is only available in black.
On the search page I want to display products not variants - in this test case
2 products should b
This looks like you are using a SolrJ version different than the Solr
server version you are using. Make sure that server and client are using
the same Solr version.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> You probably have a non-char codepoint hanging around somewhere. You can
>
You probably have a non-char codepoint hanging around somewhere. You
can strip them away:
http://unicode.org/cldr/utility/list-unicodeset.jsp?a=[:Noncharacter_Code_Point=True:]
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:33:35 +0800, "怪侠" <87863...@qq.com> wrote:
Hi, all.
I want to update the file's index. The fo
49 matches
Mail list logo
