Exactly. That's what I mean. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mikhail, > > Thanks for the response. Just to be clear you're saying that the size > of the index does not matter, it's more the size of the results? > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Frankly speaking the computational complexity of Lucene search depends > from > > size of search result: numFound*log(start+rows), but from size of index. > > > > Regards > > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I'm curious if anyone tell me how Solr/Lucene performs in a situation > >> where you have 100,000 documents each with 100 tokens vs having > >> 1,000,000 documents each with 10 tokens. Should I expect the > >> performance to be the same? Any information would be greatly > >> appreciated. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev > > Lucid Certified > > Apache Lucene/Solr Developer > > Grid Dynamics > > > > <http://www.griddynamics.com> > > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Lucid Certified Apache Lucene/Solr Developer Grid Dynamics <http://www.griddynamics.com> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
