Solr Specification Version: 1.4.0
Solr Implementation Version: 1.4.0 833479 - grantingersoll - 2009-11-06
12:33:40
Lucene Specification Version: 2.9.1
Lucene Implementation Version: 2.9.1 832363 - 2009-11-03 04:37:25
precisionStep="6" positionIncrementGap="0"/>
stored="false" omitNorms="true"
I don't know if you'll find exactly what you need, but you can sort by any
field or FunctionQuery. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Peter Spam wrote:
> Is there a way to use a custom sorter, to avoid re-indexing?
>
>
> Thanks!
> Pete
>
> On Oct 21, 2
Is there a way to use a custom sorter, to avoid re-indexing?
Thanks!
Pete
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Well, yes. You probably have a string field for that content, right? so the
> content is being compared as strings, not as numbers, that why something
> like 100
I was thinking in this, would it make sense to keep the master / slave
architecture, adding documents to the master and the slaves, do soft commits
(only) to the slaves and hard commits to the master? That way you wouldn't
be doing any merges on slaves. Would that make sense?
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011
Hi Tod, Solr doesn't actually crawl, If you need to feed Solr with that kind
of information you'll have to use some crawling tool or implement that
yourself.
Regards,
Tomás
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Tod wrote:
> I have a feeling the answer is "no" since you wouldn't want to start
> inde
Well, yes. You probably have a string field for that content, right? so the
content is being compared as strings, not as numbers, that why something
like 1000 is lower than 2. Leading zeros would be an option. Another option
is to separate the field into numeric fields and sort by those (this last
Yeah - a distributed update processor like the one Yonik wrote will do fine in
simple situations.
On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Esteban Donato wrote:
> thanks Yonik. Any idea of when this should be completed? In the
> meantime I think I will have to add docs to every replica, possibly
> impleme
On a quick pass this looks okay - especially if it works on the same host.
Seems odd you would get a 404 with the zk link - without more info I don't know
what is up with that, but perhaps when Solr tries to determine the local
machines address, it's not finding what you want? We use localHost =
So to me it heightens the probability of classloader conflicts,
I haven't worked with Solr 4.0, so I don't know if set of JAR files
are the same with Solr 3.4. Anyway, make sure that there is only
ONE instance of apache-solr-dataimporthandler-***.jar in your
whole tomcat+webapp.
Maybe you have thi
Hi everyone,
I have a field that has a letter in it (for example, 1A1, 2A1, 11C15, etc.).
Sorting it seems to work most of the time, except for a few things, like 10A1
is lower than 8A100, and 10A100 is lower than 10A99. Any ideas? I bet if my
data had leading zeros (ie 10A099), it would beh
its deployed on a tomcat server ..
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Alireza Salimi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do you start Solr, through start.jar or you deploy it to a web
> container?
> Sometimes problems like this are because of different class loaders.
> I hope my answer would help you.
>
> Regard
Hi Hoss,
It ended up been permission issue. I moved the example folder to
/usr/local/jakarta/tomcat/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/ and it was able to find it.
Java seem to be giving file not found even if it doesn't have permissions to
access it.
I'm wondering in such cases under what user runs tomcat an
On 10/19/2011 2:58 PM, wrote:
Hi Tod,
I had similar issue with slf4j, but it was NoClassDefFound. Do you
have some other dependencies in your application that use some other
version of slf4j? You can use mvn dependency:tree to get all
dependencies in your application. Or maybe there's some other
Hi,
How do you start Solr, through start.jar or you deploy it to a web
container?
Sometimes problems like this are because of different class loaders.
I hope my answer would help you.
Regards
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Adeel Qureshi wrote:
> Hi I am trying to setup the data import handl
I have a feeling the answer is "no" since you wouldn't want to start
indexing a large volume of office documents containing hyperlinks that
could lead all over the internet. But, since there might be a use case
like "a customer just asked me if it could be done?", I thought I would
make sure.
Thanks for your note, Anand. What was the maximum chunk size for you? Could
you post the relevant portions of your configuration file?
Thanks!
Pete
On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:20 AM, anand.ni...@rbs.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was also facing the issue of highlighting the large text files. I applied
Thanks for the response, Karsten.
1) What's the recommended maximum chunk size?
2) Does my tokenizer look reasonable?
Thanks!
Pete
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:28 AM, karsten-s...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> highlighting in large text files can not be fast without dividing the
> original text in
Hi I am trying to setup the data import handler with solr 4.0 and having
some unexpected problems. I have a multi-core setup and only one core needed
the dataimport handler so I have added the request handler to it and added
the lib imports in config file
for some reason this doesnt works .. it
http://business.zimzaz.com/wordpress/2011/10/how-to-clone-wikipedia-mirror-and-index-wikipedia-with-solr/
Whether removing the filter of not really depends on the use of it in the
search and what result is expected from it.
Have a look at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory
I'd say you should find out what exactly are the requirements for the
search,
Hi Floyd,
Typically you'd do this by creating a custom analyzer that
- segments Chinese text into words
- Converts from words to pinyin or zhuyin
Your index would have both the actual Hanzi characters, plus (via copyfield)
this phonetic version.
During search, you'd use dismax to search agai
Yea, I'm using EdgeNGramFilterFactory, should I remove that? I actually
inherited this index from another person who used to be part of the project,
so there may be a few things that need to be changed. Here is my field type
from the schema:
Well... the limitation of DocValues is that it cannot handle more than
one value per document (which UnInvertedField can).
Hopefully we can fix that at some point :)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> In trunk we have a feat
Sweet + Very cool!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Simon Willnauer <
simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> In trunk we have a feature called IndexDocValues which basically
> creates the uninverted structure at index time. You can then simply
> suck that into memory or even access it on disk d
UPDATE:
i checked out the latest trunk-version and patched this with the patch from
LUCENE-2208.
This patch seems not to work. Or i had done something wrong.
My old log snippets:
Http - 500 Internal Server Error
Error: Carrot2 clustering failed
And this was caused by:
Http - 500 Internal
Hello,
does anybody know how to combine SolrMultipleCriteriaQuery and LocalParams (in
SOLRnet)?
I've tried things like that (don't worry about bad the code, it's just to test)
var test = solr.Query(BuildQuery(parameters), new QueryOptions
{
FilterQue
In trunk we have a feature called IndexDocValues which basically
creates the uninverted structure at index time. You can then simply
suck that into memory or even access it on disk directly
(RandomAccess). Even if I can't help you right now this is certainly
going to help you here. There is no need
Hi,
I was also facing the issue of highlighting the large text files. I applied the
solution proposed here and it worked. But I am getting following error :
Basically 'hitGrouped.vm' is not found. I am using solr-3.4.0. Where can I get
this file from. Its reference is present in browse.vm
we have implemented one supporting "did you mean" and preffix suggestion
for Chinese. But we base our working on solr 1.4 and we did many
modifications so it will cost time to integrate it to current solr/lucene.
Here are our solution. glad to see any advices.
1. offline words and p
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Pranav Prakash wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have set up a Solr instance and upon attempting to index document, the
> whole process is painfully slow. I will try to put as much info as I can in
> this mail. Pl. feel free to ask me anything else that might be required.
>
HI Peter,
You might wanna check out
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent.
Regards,
Dirceu
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Peter A. Kirk wrote:
> Hi
>
> is it possible to set up Solr so that a search for a particular term
> results in some arbitrary (selected) documents?
> For
Hi
is it possible to set up Solr so that a search for a particular term results in
some arbitrary (selected) documents?
For example, I want a search for "elephant" to return documents with id's 17,
18 and 36. Even though these documents would not normally occur in a result for
a search for "ele
Hi Peter,
highlighting in large text files can not be fast without dividing the original
text in small piece.
So take a look in
http://xtf.cdlib.org/documentation/under-the-hood/#Chunking
and in
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2010/09/16/2446/
Which means that you should divide your files a
This approach seems fine. You might benchmark it through load test etc.
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Getting-single-documents-by-fq-on-unique-field-performance-tp3440229p3440351.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi,
Are you using any kind of NGram tokenizer?
At first I'd have said it is caused by stemming, but since it's not like the
stem and it's derived word are being highlighted, it's more like parts of it
are...
If you use NGram or EdgeNGram this will generate tokens for each part of the
word (the si
As an alternative, I can suggest this one which worked great for me:
- generate the ready-for-indexing XML documents on a file system
- use curl to feed them into Solr
I am not dealing with huge volumes, but was surprised at how *fast* Solr was
indexing my documents using this simple approach. Al
Hi,
We do regular searches against documents, with highlighting on. To
then view a document in more detail, we re-do the search but using
fq=id:12345 to return the single document of interest, but still want
highlighting on, so sending the q param back again.
Is there anything you would rec
My interpretation of your results are that your FQ found 1281 documents
with 1213206 value in sou_codeMetier field. Of those results, 476 also
had 1212104 as a value...and so on. Since ALL the results will have
the field value in your FQ, then I would expect the "other" values to
be equal or less
Pravesh,
Not exactly. Here is the search I do, in more details (different field name,
but same issue).
I want to get a count for a specific value of the sou_codeMetier field,
which is multivalued. I expressed this by including a fq clause :
/select/?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=sou_codeMetier&fq
Hi,
I think what you are looking for are synonym rules like this:
dog, cat, bird => animal
I think the following link can be interesting to you as well:
http://wisdombase.net/wiki/index.php?title=Hiearchy_synonym_search_solution_in_solr
I am not a Solr expert but speaking about Lucene synonyms
Are you posting through HTTP/SOLRJ?
Your script time 'T' includes time between sending POST request -to- the
response fetched after successful response right??
Try sending in small batches like 10-20. BTW how many documents are u
indexing???
Regds
Pravesh
--
View this message in context:
Could u clarify on below:
>>When I make a search on facet.qua_code=1234567 ??
Are u trying to say, when u fire a fresh search for a facet item, like;
q=qua_code:1234567??
This this would fetch for documents where qua_code fields contains either
the terms 1234567 OR both terms (1234567 & 9384738..
42 matches
Mail list logo
