Yeah - a distributed update processor like the one Yonik wrote will do fine in simple situations.
On Oct 17, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Esteban Donato wrote: > thanks Yonik. Any idea of when this should be completed? In the > meantime I think I will have to add docs to every replica, possibly > implementing an update processor. Something similar to SOLR-2355? > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Esteban Donato >> <esteban.don...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I found soft commits very useful for NRT search requirements. >>> However I couldn't figure out how replication works with this feature. >>> I mean, if I have N replicas of an index for load balancing purposes, >>> when I soft commit a doc in one of this nodes, is there any way that >>> those "in-memory" docs get replicated to the rest of replicas? >> >> Nope. Index replication isn't really that compatible with NRT. >> But the new distributed indexing features we're working on will be! >> The parent issue for this effort is SOLR-2358. >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference >> - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com 2011.lucene-eurocon.org | Oct 17-20 | Barcelona
