Hi Mauricio,
Thanks for the suggestions :) I'm already running mono 2.10.5 so i
should be safe..
And thanks to everybody for quick answers and friendly attitude.
Best regards,
Nicklas
On 2011-09-13 03:01, Mauricio Scheffer wrote:
Hi Nicklas,
Use a nullable DateTime type instead of MinValue
The time we implemented the feature, there was no straight forward solution.
What we did is to facet on the grouped by field and counting the facets.
This would give you the distinct count for the groups.
You may also want to check the Patch @
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2242, whic
Hi
Is it possible to get number of groups that matched with specified query.
like let say there are three fields in index
DocumentID
Content
Industry
and now i want to query as +(Content:is Content:the)
group=true&group.field=industry
now is it possible to get how many industries matched wit
You can easily use cron with curl to do what you want to do.
On 9/12/11 2:47 PM, "Pulkit Singhal" wrote:
>I don't see anywhere in:
>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2305
>any statement that shows the code's inclusion was "decided against"
>when did this happen and what is needed from th
Hi,
Can you explain me this problem?
I have indexed data from multi file which use tika libs. And i have indexed
data from http. But only one file (ex: http://myweb/filename.pdf). Now i
have many file formats in a http path (ex:http://myweb/files/). I tried
index data from a http path but it's not
Hi Nicklas,
Use a nullable DateTime type instead of MinValue. It's semantically more
correct, and SolrNet will do the right mapping.
I also heard that Mono had a bug in date parsing, it didn't behave just like
.NET :
https://github.com/mausch/SolrNet/commit/f3a76ea5535633f4b301e644e25eb2dc7f0cb7ef
I mean it's a known bug.
Hostetter AND (-chris *:*)
Should do the trick.
Depending on your request.
NAME:(-chris *:*)
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Sauts [mailto:patrick.via...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 3:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Weird b
Maybe this will answer your question
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ
Why does 'foo AND -baz' match docs, but 'foo AND (-bar)' doesn't ?
Boolean queries must have at least one "positive" expression (ie; MUST or
SHOULD) in order to match. Solr tries to help with this, and if asked to
execute a Bool
: I'm crashing into a weird behavior with - operators.
I went ahead and added a FAQ on this using some text from a previous
nearly identical email ...
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#Why_does_.27foo_AND_-baz.27_match_docs.2C_but_.27foo_AND_.28-bar.29.27_doesn.27t_.3F
please reply if you have
I have the following solr fields in schema.xml:
- id (string)
- name (string)
- category(string)
- latitude (double)
- longitude(double)
Is it possible to make a query that groups by category and returns the
average of latitude and longitude instead of the doclist?
Thanks,
Pablo
Thanks Chris !
Will try out the second approach you suggested and share my findings.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > Would highly appreciate if someone can suggest other efficient ways to
> : > address this kind of a requirement.
>
> one approach would be to index
: > Would highly appreciate if someone can suggest other efficient ways to
: > address this kind of a requirement.
one approach would be to index each attachment as it's own document and
search those. you could then use things like the group collapsing
features to return onlly the "main" type
I don't see anywhere in:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2305
any statement that shows the code's inclusion was "decided against"
when did this happen and what is needed from the community before
someone with the powers to do so will actually commit this?
2011/6/24 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब
Is case #2 planned to be coded in the future releases?
Thanks.
Alex.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Bell
To: solr-user
Sent: Thu, Sep 8, 2011 10:17 pm
Subject: Re: pagination with grouping
There are 2 use cases:
1. rows=10 means 10 groups.
2. rows=10 means to results (irr
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2011/09/12/learn-lucene/ - pasted below too
Hi everyone... I'm not usually much on advertising/hyping events where I speak
and teach, but I'm really interested in drumming up a solid attendance for our
Lucene training that I'll be teaching at Lucene EuroCon i
Hello Bill,
I can't really answer your question about replicaiton being supported on
Solr3.3 (I use trunk 4.x myself) BUT I can tell you that if each Solr node
has just one core ... only then does it make sense to use
-Denable.master=true and -Denable.slave=true ... otherwise, as Yury points
out,
Given an RSS raw feed source link such as the following:
http://persistent.info/cgi-bin/feed-proxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2Frss%2Ftag%2Fblu-ray%2Fnew%2Fref%3Dtag_rsh_hl_ersn
I can easily get to the value of the description for an item like so:
But the content of "description" happens to
Beyond the suggestions already made, i would add:
a) being really aggressive about stop words can help keep the index size
down, which can help reduce the amount of memory needed to scan the term
lists
b) faceting w/o any caching is likelye going to be too slow to be
acceptible.
c) don't sor
Hi, Michael.
Well, the stock answer is, 'it depends'
For example - would you want to be able to search filename without searching
file contents, or would you always search both of them together? If both, then
copy both the file name and the parsed file content from the pdf into a single
searc
On Sep 11, 2011, at 23:24 , William Bell wrote:
> I am using 3.3 SOLR. I tried passing in -Denable.master=true and
> -Denable.slave=true on the Slave machine.
> Then I changed solrconfig.xml to reference each as per:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BA
On 9/11/2011 11:24 PM, William Bell wrote:
> I am using 3.3 SOLR. I tried passing in -Denable.master=true and
> -Denable.slave=true on the Slave machine.
> Then I changed solrconfig.xml to reference each as per:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slav
I also would like to know the answer to this. But my feeling is
that you can't do what you want. I also had to use the highlighting
workaround and aggregate dynamic field to accomplish the inability
of multivalued fields to accommodate it.
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:44:01 -0400, Rahul Warawdekar
wro
Hi,
I have a a query on Solr search as follows.
I am indexing an entity which includes a multivalued field using DIH.
This multivalued field contains content from multiple attachments for
a single entity.
Now, for eg. if i search for the term "solr", will I be able to know
which field contains t
Hi all,
That's right, hold on to your hats, we're holding another London Search
Social on the 18th Oct.
http://www.meetup.com/london-search-social/events/33218292/
Venue is still TBD, but highly likely to be a quiet(ish) central London pub.
There's usually a healthy mix of experience and backgro
Hi,
Do they? Can you explain the layout of the documents?
There are two ways to handle multi lingual docs. If all your docs have both an
English and a Norwegian version, you may either split these into two separate
documents, each with the "language" field filled by LangId - which then also
l
Hi Koji,
Thanks for the information !
I will try the patches provided by you.
On 9/8/11, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (11/09/09 6:16), Rahul Warawdekar wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently evaluating the FastVectorHighlighter in a Solr search based
>> project and have a couple of questions
>>
>> 1. Is
Some possibilities:
1) Put the file extension into your index (that is what we did when we were
testing indexing documents with Solr)
2) Put a mime type for the document into your index.
3) Put the whole file name / URL into your index, and match on part of the
name. This will give some false p
Thanks. It's definitely repeatable and I may spend some time plumbing this
further. I'll let the list know if I find anything.
The problem went away once I optimized the index down to a single segment
using a simple IndexWriter driver. This was a bit strange since the
resulting index contained sim
You could prevent queries to the master by limiting what IP addresses are
allowed to communicate with it, or by modifying web.xml to put different
security on /update vs. /select .
We took a simplistic approach. We did some load testing, and discovered that
we could handle our expected update
Looking at the Wiki (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters ), it looks like
the solr.StandardTokenizerFactory changed with Solr 3.1 .
We use solr.KeyWordTokenizerFactory for our middle names (and then also throw
in solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory to normalize to lower case).
Um - looks like you specified your id value as "pdfy", which is reflected in
the results from the "*:*" query, but your id query is searching for "vpn",
hence no matches...
What does this query yield?
http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=id:pdfy
Bob Sandiford | Lead Software Engineer | SirsiDynix
P:
The changes to that class were minor. There is only support for
parsing a grouped response. Check the QueryResponse class there is a
method getGroupResponse()
I ran into similar exceptions when creating the
QueryResponseTest#testGroupResponse test. The test use a xml response
from a file.
On 12 Se
The easiest way is to use CRON and cURL for this.
So add somthing like curl
http://localhost:8080/solr/dataimport?command=full-import to your cron.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-it-possibler-to-do-a-scheduling-internally-in-solr-application-tp3329381p3329
http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=id:vpn
yeilds this:
-
-
0
15
-
id:vpn
*
http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=*:*
yeilds this:
-
-
0
16
-
*.*
-
-
doc
-
application/pdf
pdfy
2011-05-20T
Martijn,
I can't find the fixed version.
I've got the last version of SolrJ but I see only minor changes in
XMLResponseParser.java. And it doesn't support grouping yet. I also
checked branch_3x, branch for 3.4.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Martijn v Groningen
wrote:
> Also the error you desc
It's complecated to give you sample data. But this error depends on the size
of data. I have indexed 200 docs and this error did not occurred. But I need
much more (ie. 5 000 000), so if I try to index 2000 docs then come this
error.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
Hi,
Solandra specific issue should be raised on
http://github.com/tjake/Solandra/issues
Could you also provide some sample data ans schama I can try to reproduce
with?
Thanks,
Jake
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:57 AM, tom135 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some index and two search query:
> 1. http:/
Hello,
I have some index and two search query:
1. http://127.0.0.1:8983/solandra/INDEX_NAME/select?q=type:(3 2 1) AND
category:(2 1) AND text:(WORD1 WORD2 WORD3 WORD4
WORD5)&facet.field=creation_date&facet=true&wt=javabin&version=2
This query works good
2. 1. http://127.0.0.1:8983/solandra/INDEX
if you have a limited set of searches which need to use this and they
act on a limited known set of fields you can concat fields at index
time and then facet
PK FLD1 FLD2FLD3 FLD4 FLD5 copy45
AB0 AB 0 x yx y
AB1 AB 1 x
hi all
i am unable to do scheduling in solr to execute the commands like
full-import and delta-import .and also
is it possibler to do a scheduling internally in solr application?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-it-possibler-to-do-a-scheduling-internally-in
To support this, we also need to implement indexing block of documents in Solr.
Basically the UpdateHandler should also use this method:
IndexWriter#addDocuments(Collection documents)
On 12 September 2011 01:01, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Even if it applies, this is for Lucene. I don't think we
Hello
I want to search on articles. So need to find only specific files like doc,
docx, and pdf.
I don't need any html pages. Thus the result of our search should only
consists of doc, docx, and pdf files.
can you help me?
Also the error you described when wt=xml and using SolrJ is also fixed
in 3.4 (and in trunk / branch3x).
You can wait for the 3.4 release of use a night 3x build.
Martijn
On 12 September 2011 12:41, Sanal K Stephen wrote:
> Kirill,
>
> Parsing the grouped result using SolrJ is not releas
Kirill,
Parsing the grouped result using SolrJ is not released yet I
think..its going to release with Solr 3.4.0.SolrJ client cannot parse
grouped and range facets results SOLR-2523.
see the release notes of Solr 3.4.0
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote34
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3
I found that SolrQuery doesn’t work with grouping.
I constructed SolrQuery this way:
solrQuery = constructFullSearchQuery(searchParams);
solrQuery.set("group", true);
solrQuery.set("group.field", "GeonameId");
Solr successfully handles request and writes about that in log:
INFO: [] webapp=/solr
I see. I'm using that date to flag that my entity "has not yet ended". I
can just use another constant which Solr is capable of returning in the
correct format. The nice thing about DateTime.MinValue is that it's just
part of the .net framework :)
Hope that the issue is resolved at some point.
Hi Pierre,
Great idea, that will speed things up!
Thank your very much.
Regards
Ericz
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Pierre GOSSE wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> If you want a query informing one customer of its product row at any given
> time, the easiest way is to filter on submission date greater
Number of cache is definitely going to reduce heap usage.
Can you run those xlsx file separately with Tika and see if you are getting
OOM issue.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:09 PM, abhijit bashetti wrote:
> I am facing the OOM issue.
>
> OTHER than increasing the RAM , Can we chnage some other par
I am facing the OOM issue.
OTHER than increasing the RAM , Can we chnage some other parameters to
avoid the OOM issue.
such as minimizing the filter cache size , document cache size etc.
Can you suggest me some other option to avoid the OOM issue?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Abhijit
What is single document has multiple languages?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Everybody else use dedicated field per language, so why can't you?
> Please explain your use case, and perhaps we can better help understand
> what you're trying to do.
> Do you always kn
Hi Eric,
If you want a query informing one customer of its product row at any given
time, the easiest way is to filter on submission date greater than this
customer's and return the result count. If you have 500 products with an
earlier submission date, your row number is 501.
Hope this helps,
Hi Manish,
Thank you for your time.
For upselling reasons I want to inform the customer that:
"your product is on the last page of the search result. However, click here
to put your product back on the first page..."
Here is an example:
I have a phone with productid 635001 in the iphone categor
Hi,
What do you get from a query http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=*:* or
http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=id:vpn ?
You may not have mapped the fields correctly to your schema?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 12. sep.
Hi
Everybody else use dedicated field per language, so why can't you?
Please explain your use case, and perhaps we can better help understand what
you're trying to do.
Do you always know the query language in advance?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Sol
You might not be able to find the row index.
Can you post your query in detail. The kind of inputs and outputs you are
expecting.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
> Hi Manish,
>
> Thanks for your reply - but how will that return me the row index of the
> original query.
>
> Re
Hi Manish,
Thanks for your reply - but how will that return me the row index of the
original query.
Regards
Ericz
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Manish Bafna wrote:
> fq -> filter query parameter searches within the results.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Grobler >wrote:
>
> > Hi
fq -> filter query parameter searches within the results.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
> Hi Solr experts,
>
> If you have a site with products sorted by submission date, the product of
> a
> customer might be on page 1 on the first day, and then move down to page x
> as ot
Hi Solr experts,
If you have a site with products sorted by submission date, the product of a
customer might be on page 1 on the first day, and then move down to page x
as other customers submit newer entries.
To find the row of a product you can of course run the query and loop
through the resul
Yes , I am using TIKA for content extraction.
The xlsx file size is 25MB. IS there any other option to relsolve the
OOM issue rather than increasing the RAM.
Can we chnage some other configuration param of solr to avoid OOM issue?
Are you using Tika to do the extraction of content?
You might
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 18:48 +0200, Mike Austin wrote:
> Our index is very small with 100k documents and a light load at the moment.
> If I wanted to use the smallest possible RAM on the server, how would I do
> this and what are the issues?
The index size depends just as much on the size of the do
Are you using Tika to do the extraction of content?
You might be getting OOM because of huge xlsx file.
Try having bigger RAM and you might not get the issue.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:44 PM, abhijit bashetti <
abhijitbashe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the OOM error.
>
> I am wor
Hi,
I am getting the OOM error.
I am working with multi-core for solr . I am using DIH for indexing. I have
also integrated TIKA for content extraction.
I am using ORACLE 10g DB.
In the solrconfig.xml , I have added
native
My indexing server is on linux with 8GB of ram.
I am indexing
Thankyou for the clarification and help guys I will try them.
On Sep 12, 2011 10:29 AM, "kkrugler [via Lucene]" <
ml-node+s472066n332847...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 11, 2011, at 7:04pm, dpt9876 wrote:
>
>> Hi thanks for the reply.
>>
>> How does nutch/solr handle the scenario where 1 we
63 matches
Mail list logo
