I see. I'm using that date to flag that my entity "has not yet ended". I
can just use another constant which Solr is capable of returning in the
correct format. The nice thing about DateTime.MinValue is that it's just
part of the .net framework :)
Hope that the issue is resolved at some point.
I'm wondering if it would be possible for you (or someone else) to fix
the issue with years from 1 to 999 being formatted incorrectly, and then
creating a new ticket for the issue with negative years?
Best regards,
Nicklas
On 2011-09-12 07:02, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: The XML output when performing a query via the solr interface is like this:
:<datename="endDate">1-01-01T00:00:00Z</date>
i think you mean:<date name="endDate">1-01-01T00:00:00Z</date>
:> > So my question is: Is this a bug in the solr output engine, or should
mono
:> > be able to parse the date as given from solr? I have not yet tried it out
:> > on .net as I do not have access to a windows machine at the moment.
it is in fact a bug in Solr that not a lot of people have been overly
concerned with some most people don't deal with dates that far back....
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1899
...I spent a little time working on it at one point but got side tracked
by other things since there are a coupld of related issues with the
canonical iso8601 date format arround year "0" that made it non obvious
what hte "ideal" solution was.
-Hoss
