Thank you Lance, but that German/Germany thing was just an example... I have
some other problems too... but well first will try your advice
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/invisible-words-tp3158060p3161365.html
Sent
It just means in your schema.xml, you have a SynonymFilterFactory
configured, but it has no actual active rules (e.g. synonyms.txt is
empty or all commented out).
the reason for the warning is that its a little strange to declare to
use a synonymfilterfactory in the schema that doesn't actually ha
Sorry Robert,
What does that mean? Should I be providing synonyms in my queries?
Cheers
Stu
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I just committed a fix for this, to warn that you are using an empty
> set of synonyms instead of error.
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Stua
German/Germany is being changed by an English-language stemmer.
Strip your analysis chains down the minimum and walk through what
happens when you add each step.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:43 PM, deniz wrote:
> Thank you Erick, I have did what you have said but unfortunately, nothing is
> changed
I just committed a fix for this, to warn that you are using an empty
set of synonyms instead of error.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Stuart King wrote:
> I have been building and running against trunk. In my build I have a number
> of tests, testing solr functionality within my app.
>
> As of
Thank you Erick, I have did what you have said but unfortunately, nothing is
changed with the problem... Even if I use the admin interface the result is
still the same...
I have tried removing stopword and synonym files too but still i got that
weird result...
another fact is that i can match
I have been building and running against trunk. In my build I have a number
of tests, testing solr functionality within my app.
As of yesterday, I am getting build failures with this exception. Something
has changed on trunk. I am not sure what.
ERROR [12 Jul 2011 12:49:28] org.apache.solr.core.S
I don't think you have wrong setting in UIMA, but you may have the request
handler
named "/update/javabin" in solrconfig.xml is not correct?
koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/07/12 0:52), Sowmya V.B. wrote:
Hi
I just added the fields which are added to the index by one of the
annotators
> Hi all,
>
> Are there some kind of average indexing times or PDF's in relation to
> its size?
> I have here a 10MB PDF (50 pages) which takes about 30 seconds to index!
> Is that normal?
Depends on you hardware. PDF parsing is a lot more tedious than XML and
besides parsing it's also analyzed
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Jens Sieckmann wrote:
> From: Jens Sieckmann
> Subject: Query grouping search terms with proximity operator
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Date: Monday, July 11, 2011, 6:44 PM
> Hi folks,
>
> I’m new to Solr and just evaluating it for my purposes.
>
> I want to c
There is a syntax that allows you to specify different analyzers to use
for indexing and querying, in solr.xml. But if you don't do that, it
should use the same analyzer in both cases.
-Mike
On 07/11/2011 10:58 AM, Gabriele Kahlout wrote:
With a lucene QueryParser instance it's possible to
have a look here [1].
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2645?focusedCommentId=13062748&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13062748
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Mark Schoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to create a solr core but I always get
Bump?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:17:42PM +0100, me said:
> On the SolrJetty page
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty
>
> there's a link to a tar ball
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrJetty?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=DEMO_multiple_webapps_jetty_6.1.3.tgz
>
> which fails with th
Hi,
I am trying to execute an !frange query, but I can't seem to get past the
following error,
Bad Request
request: http://xyz.com:12397/solr/tw/select?q=(Organix)&fq={%21frange l=834925
u=834925}id&fq={%21frange l=834345 u=834345}id&sort=createdOnGMTDate
desc&start=0&rows=26&wt=javabin&versi
You can use solr.TextField and KeywordTokenizer because it creates just a
token with the input.
bye
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Increase-String-length-tp3156430p3159454.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for the reply.
I am having a very huge index, so to retrieve older documents when not
needed definitely wastes time and also at the same time I would need to do
recency boosts/ time sort. So, I am looking for a way to avoid that.
Thats why I am in need to restrict my docset and recently ad
Hi
I just added the fields which are added to the index by one of the
annotators to the index, in the fieldmappings section. I am not getting any
compilation errors and still see the admin interface. However, when I index,
i just get a SolrException,
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad Requ
Hi folks,
I’m new to Solr and just evaluating it for my purposes.
I want to combine OR-grouped search terms by using the proximity
operator with other OR-grouped terms. Something like (although
this is not query parser syntax):
(term A OR term B OR term c) NEAR/5 (term D OR term E)
I didn't fin
disclaimer: I'm not an expert of UIMA. I've just started using it when Solr 3.1
integrated UIMA!
Thanks for the clarification. Now, I get it.
Should section mention all the annotators, even if the
annotators do not add any new fields?
For example, if I have a pipeline, starting from "parser"
Hi all,
Are there some kind of average indexing times or PDF's in relation to
its size?
I have here a 10MB PDF (50 pages) which takes about 30 seconds to index!
Is that normal?
greetings
alex
Koji
Thanks for the clarification. Now, I get it.
Should section mention all the annotators, even if the
annotators do not add any new fields?
For example, if I have a pipeline, starting from "parser", "tokenizer" and
"tagger", all of them operate on a field called "text"..which is the
of the d
I am using the Edismax query parser and have noticed that if I specify
a field that is invalid for a document I still get results which I
would not have expected. For instance if I say first_name:kris, and
not all my documents have the field first name I can still get back
documents where the firs
Thanks Dmitry, I think I've got this now.
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
> was typying this on-the-go from my phone, I meant LuceneQParserPlugin of
> course.
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
>
>> you can try extending LuceneQParser. In its createParser me
With a lucene QueryParser instance it's possible to set the analyzer in use.
I suspect Solr doesn't use the same analyzer it used at indexing, defined in
schema.xml but I cannot verify that without the queryparser instance.
>From Jan's diagram it seems this is set in the SearchHandler's init. Is it
Hi,
I tried to create a solr core but I always get "No such solr core:"-Exception.
-
File home = new File( pathToSolrHome );
File f = new File( home, "solr.xml" );
CoreContainer coreContainer = new CoreContainer();
coreContainer.load( pathToSolrHome, f );
EmbeddedSolrServer server = new Emb
Sowmya,
The combination of fieldNameFeature and dynamicField can be used when using,
e.g. named entity extractor that tend to produce a lot of attributes,
organization,
location, country, building, spot, title,... If you are going to use such named
entity extractor, you don't want to define each
Try running your text and query through the admin/analysis page and see
what tokens come out the other end, that may give you a clue. Nothing
jumps out from the definitions
Also, what comes out when you attach &debugQuery=on to the
query? That sometimes helps too...
Unless you have something
Hi Koji
Thanks a lot for the examples. Now, I was able to compile a JAR snapshot,
with my own UIMA pipeline. However, despite seeing the example
solrconfig.xml, I am not able to figure out how to add mine.
In the example:
entity
name
*_sm
I still don't understand wha
You can use TextField instead of StrField:
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Increase-String-length-tp3156430p3159059.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
A good answer may also depend on WHY you are wanting to restrict to 500K
documents.
Are you seeking to reduce the time spent by Solr in determining the doc count?
Are you just wanting to prevent people from moving too far into the result set?
Is it case that you can only display 6 digits for
> We want to search in an index in such a way that even if a
> clause has a long
> posting list - Solr should stop collecting documents for
> the clause
> after receiving X documents that match the clause.
>
> For example, if for query "India",solr can return 5M
> documents, we would
> like to
Hello,
Can anyone guide me on this issue?
Regards
Aviraj
-Original Message-
From: Aviraj Chavan [mailto:aviraj_cha...@persistent.co.in]
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2011 2:20 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Error using Custom Functions for DIH
Hi,
I am trying to use DIH custom f
Aviraj Chavan schrieb:
public class PrepareQuery extends Evaluator
{
@Override
public String evaluate(VariableResolver arg0, String arg1) {
String subQueryStr = "select ID, CATEGORY_NAME from
CATEGORY_MASTER where ID=" + arg1;
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> On 7/10/11 2:33 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>>
>> Currently there is no easy way to do this. I would need to think how
>> you can force the index to drop those so the answer here is no you
>> can't!
>>
>> simon
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at
Hi rocco,
you did not stop jetty after your first attempt.
(You have to kill the task.)
Best regards
Karsten
btw: How to change the port 8983:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-change-a-port-td490375.html
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:11:54 -0700 (P
Hi,
We want to search in an index in such a way that even if a clause has a long
posting list - Solr should stop collecting documents for the clause
after receiving X documents that match the clause.
For example, if for query "India",solr can return 5M documents, we would
like to restrict the se
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/invisible-
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:10 AM, deniz wrote:
> hi all...
>
> I have a field, which is a text type:
>
>
[...]
Please show us the analyser/tokeniser chain for the fieldType
"info".
Regards,
Gora
38 matches
Mail list logo
