I don't think you have wrong setting in UIMA, but you may have the request 
handler
named "/update/javabin" in solrconfig.xml is not correct?

koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/

(11/07/12 0:52), Sowmya V.B. wrote:
Hi

I just added the fields which are added to the index by one of the
annotators to the index, in the fieldmappings section. I am not getting any
compilation errors and still see the admin interface. However, when I index,
i just get a SolrException,

org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Bad Request.

On the server log, I don't see anything except for this:
127.0.0.1 - - [11/Jul/2011:17:44:04 +0200]  "POST
/apache-solr-3.3.0/update/javabin?wt=javabin&version=2 HTTP/1.1" 400 1328

Here is my UpdateRequestProcessorChain in sorlconfig.xml (Just changed the
original path names for privacy's sake!)

***********
     <!-- An update request processor chain for UIMA   -->
<updateRequestProcessorChain name="uima">
     <processor
class="org.apache.solr.uima.processor.UIMAUpdateRequestProcessorFactory">
       <lst name="uimaConfig">
         <lst name="runtimeParameters">
         <!-- Add here, the runtime parameters like Model File paths, list
file paths etc. -->
           <str
name="tokenizerModelFileLocation">/Users/svajjala/Documents/EnglishTok.bin.gz</str>
           <str
name="taggerModelFileLocation">/Users/svajjala/Documents/tag.bin.gz</str>
          <str name="AcceptedLanguages">english</str>
             <str name="SetLanguageOnEmptyAcceptList">false</str>
              <str
name="GreenlineLists">/Users/svajjala/Documents/NewGreenline</str>
        </lst>

         <str
name="analysisEngine">/Users/svajjala/Documents/ir4icallPipeline.xml</str>
         <!-- Set to true if you want to continue indexing even if text
processing fails.
              Default is false. That is, Solr throws RuntimeException and
              never indexed documents entirely in your session. -->
            <bool name="ignoreErrors">false</bool>
         <!-- This is optional. It is used for logging when text processing
fails.
              If logField is not specified, uniqueKey will be used as
logField.
         <str name="logField">id</str>
         -->
         <lst name="analyzeFields">
           <bool name="merge">false</bool>
           <arr name="fields">
             <str>text</str>
           </arr>
         </lst>

          <fieldMapping>

             <type name = "org.apache.uima.annotators.vocablistClassfier">
                 <map feature="Generic_Level5" field="Generic_Level5" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Level6" field="Generic_Level6" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Level7" field="Generic_Level7" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Level8" field="Generic_Level8" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Level9" field="Generic_Level9" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Level10" field="Generic_Level10" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Level11" field="Generic_Level11" />
                 <map feature="Generic_Ratio" field="Generic_Ratio" />
                 <map feature="Generic_TotalWordCount"
field="Generic_TotalWordCount" />
             </type>

         </fieldMapping>
       </lst>
     </processor>
     <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
     <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
   </updateRequestProcessorChain>

     ************
I don't understand where exactly can I see a more detailed log of why its
not getting indexed.

Sowmya.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Koji Sekiguchi<k...@r.email.ne.jp>  wrote:

disclaimer: I'm not an expert of UIMA. I've just started using it when Solr
3.1
integrated UIMA!


  Thanks for the clarification. Now, I get it.
Should<fieldMapping>   section mention all the annotators, even if the
annotators do not add any new fields?


  For example, if I have a pipeline, starting from "parser", "tokenizer" and
"tagger", all of them operate on a field called "text"..which is the<html>
of the document. but all these annotators do not add any new fields to the
index. Should I still write fieldmappings for these annotators inside
SolrConfig.?


I don't think so. Try it and if you got errors, come back to this list!


koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/





Reply via email to