Greek and English text into the same field

Hello everyone, I have a index that contains text (several fileds) that can be in English or in Greek. I have found the corresponding filters solr.GreekLowerCaseFilterFactory solr.GreekStemFilterFactory for the greek language along with the special type text_greek included to the default schema.

Re: Custom request handler/plugin

Thanks for the response. Finally I have decided to build access intelligence into the Solr to pre filter the results by storing required attributes in the index to determine the access. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Custom-request-handler-plugin-tp2673822p26

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Here is an example of doing this in DIH. Say you have a field foobar, that is a string type and has | between the strings that you want to put into a multiValued list. This is fairly easy to do with Regex feature of DIH. But say you also want to take the field and grab the lowest value and store i

RE: Helpful new JVM parameters

Our tests showed, in our situation, the "compressed oops" flag caused our minor (ParNew) generation time to decrease significantly. We're using a larger heap (22gb) and our index size is somewhere in the 40's gb total. I guess with any of these jvm parameters, it all depends on your situation

Re: Helpful new JVM parameters

will UseCompressedOops be useful? for application using less than 4GB memory, it will be better that 64bit reference. But for larger memory using application, it will not be cache friendly. "JRocket the definite guide" says: "Naturally, 64 GB isn't a theoretical limit but just an example. It was me

Re: Custom search filters

: Hi all, I am trying to use a custom search filter : (org.apache.lucene.search.Filter) but I am unsure of where I should configure : this. : : Would I have to create my own SearchHandler that would wrap this logic in? Any : example/suggestions out there? the easiest way to plugin a custom Filte

Re: Smart Pagination queries

: In order to paint "Next" links app would have to know total number of : records that user is eligible for read. getNumFound() will tell me that : there are total 4K records that Solr returned. If there wasn't any : entitlement rules then it could have been easier to determine how many : "Next"

Re: Rename fields in a query

hi, Arslan! By object, I was saying an instance of [org.apache.lucene.search.Query]. For performance purposes, I'm wanting rewrite a fuzzy query in a field and, then, query in another. Thank you! On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 18:43, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > Given a Query object "(name:firefox > > nam

Re: Spacial Search Field Type

> I thought I read that you had to have Solr 4.0 for the > LatLon field > type, but isn't 1.4 = 4.0? Do I need some type of patch or > different > version of Solr to use that field type? No, 1.4 and 4.0 are different. You can checkout trunk http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Getting_the_

Spacial Search Field Type

I am using Solr 1.4.1 (Solr Implementation Version: 1.4.1 955763M - mark - 2010-06-17 18:06:42) to be exact. I'm trying to implement that GeoSpacial field type by adding to the schema: but I get the following errors: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown fieldtype 'location' spec

Re: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Geeta Subramanian wrote: > Here is the attached xml. > In our xml, maxBufferedDocs is commented. I hope that's not causing any issue. > The ramBufferSizeMB is 32Mb, will changing  this be of any use to me? Nope... your index settings are fine. Perhaps something in

Re: Rename fields in a query

> Given a Query object "(name:firefox > name:opera)", is it possible 'rename' > the fields names to, for example, "(content:firefox > content:opera)"? By saying object you mean solrJ? Anyway, it that helps, with &df parameter you can change fields. &q=firefox opera&df=name will be parsed into

Re: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Geeta Subramanian wrote: > Hi Yonik, > > I am not setting the ramBufferSizeMB or maxBufferedDocs params... > DO I need to for Indexing? No, the default settings that come with Solr should be fine. You should verify that they have not been changed however. An olde

Retrieving Ranking (Position)

Hi, I am looking for the way to retrieve a ranking (or position) of the document matched in the result set. I can get the data, then parse it to find the position of the document matched, but am looking for the way if there is a feature. Thanks, Jae

DIH Issue(newbie to solr)

I am a newbie to solr I have an issue with DIH but unable to pinpoint what is causing the issue. I am using the demo jetty installation of Solr and tried to create a project with new schema.xml, solrconfig.xml and data-config.xml files. when I run "http://131.187.88.221:8983/solr/dataimport?command

Re: dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

On 3/17/2011 5:02 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: &defType=lucene &q=*:* AND NOT _query_:"{!dismax} foo bar baz" Oops, forgot a part, for anyone reading this and wanting to use it as a solution. You can transform: $defType=dismax &q=-foo -bar -baz To: &defType=lucene &q=*:* AND NOT _query_:

RE: Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse

Hi All, Thanks for the help... I am now able to debug my solr. :-) -Original Message- From: pkeegan01...@gmail.com [mailto:pkeegan01...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Peter Keegan Sent: 17 March, 2011 3:33 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse The

Re: dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

Yeah, looks to me like two or more negated terms does the same thing, not just one. q=-foo -bar -baz Also always returns zero hits. For the same reason. I understand why (sort of), although at the same time there is a logical answer to this question "-foo -bar -baz", and oddly, 1.4.1 _lucene_

Re: dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

purely negative queries work with Solr's default ("lucene") query parser. But don't with dismax. Or so that seems with my experience testing this out just now, on trunk. In chatting with Jonathan further off-list we discussed having the best of both worlds &q={!lucene}*:* AND NOT _q

Re: dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

Oh i see, i overlooked your first query. A query with one term that is negated will yield zero results, it doesn't return all documents because nothing matches. It's, if i remember correctly, the same as when you're looking for a field that doesn't have a value: q=-field:[* TO *]. > My fault fo

Re: dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

My fault for putting in the quotes in the email, I actually don't have tests in my quotes, just tried again to make sure. And I always get 0 results on a pure negative Solr 1.4.1 dismax query. I think it does not actually work? On 3/17/2011 3:52 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: Hi, It works just as

Re: dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

Hi, It works just as expected, but not in a phrase query. Get rid of your quotes and you'll be fine. Cheers, > Should 1.4.1 dismax query parser be able to handle pure negative queries > like: > > &q="-foo" > &q="-foo -bar" > > It kind of seems to me trying it out that it can NOT. Can anyone

RE: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

Hi Yonik, I am not setting the ramBufferSizeMB or maxBufferedDocs params... DO I need to for Indexing? Regards, Geeta -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: 17 March, 2011 3:45 PM To: Geeta Subramanian Cc: solr-user@lucene.ap

Re: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

In your solrconfig.xml, Are you specifying ramBufferSizeMB or maxBufferedDocs? -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Geeta Subramanian wrote: > Hi, > >  Thanks for the reply. > I am sorry, the logs from where I posted does have a Custom Update Handler. > > But I h

Adding the suggest component

Hi all, When I installed Solr, I downloaded the most recent version (1.4.1) I believe. I wanted to implement the Suggester ( http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Suggester). I copied and pasted the information there into my solrconfig.xml file but I'm getting the following error: Error loading class 'org.

Re: Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse

The instructions refer to the 'Run configuration' menu. Did you try 'Debug configurations'? On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Keegan wrote: > Can you use jetty? > > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/developers/articles/setting-up-apache-solr-in-eclipse > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM,

Re: Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse

Can you use jetty? http://www.lucidimagination.com/developers/articles/setting-up-apache-solr-in-eclipse On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Geeta Subramanian < gsubraman...@commvault.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can some please let me know the steps on how can I debug the solr code in > my eclipse? > > I

dismax 1.4.1 and pure negative queries

Should 1.4.1 dismax query parser be able to handle pure negative queries like: &q="-foo" &q="-foo -bar" It kind of seems to me trying it out that it can NOT. Can anyone else verify? The documentation I can find doesn't say one way or another. Which is odd because the documentation for straight

Re: Sorting on multiValued fields via function query

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > As the code stands now: we fail fast and let the person building hte index > make a decision. Indexing two fields when one could work is unfortunate though. I think what we should support (eventually) is a max() function will also work on

Re: Helpful new JVM parameters

Awesome, very helpful. Do you maybe want to add this to the Solr wiki somewhere? Finding some advice for JVM tuning for Solr can be challenging, and you've explained what you did and why very well. On 3/17/2011 2:59 PM, Dyer, James wrote: We're on the final stretch in getting our product data

Helpful new JVM parameters

We're on the final stretch in getting our product database in Production with Solr. We have 13m "wide-ish" records with quite a few stored fields in a single index (no shards). We sort on at least a dozen fields and facet on 20-30. One thing that came up in QA testing is we were getting full

OOM for large files

Hi, I am getting OOM after posting a 100 Mb document to SOLR with trace: Exception in thread "main" org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Java heap space java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Abstr

Segments and Memory Correlate?

Hi folks, I ran into problem today where I am no longer able to execute any queries :( due to Out of Memory issues. I am in the process of investigating the use of different mergeFactors, or even different merge policies all together. My question is if I have many segments (i.e. smaller sized segm

Re: Sorting on multiValued fields via function query

: But if lucene now can sort a multi-valued field without crashing when there : are 'too many' unique values, and with easily described and predictable : semantics (use the minimal value in the multi-valued field as sort key) -- : then it probably makes more sense for Solr to let you do that if yo

RE: Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse

Hi Markus, Thanks, I had already followed the steps of this site. But I am not able to DEBUG the SOLR classes though I am able to run the solr. I want to see the code flow from the server side, especially the point where solr calls tika and it gets the content from tika. Thanks for the time & h

RE: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

Hi, Thanks for the reply. I am sorry, the logs from where I posted does have a Custom Update Handler. But I have a local setup, which does not have a custome update handler, its as its downloaded from SOLR site, even that gives me heap space. at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Unknown Source)

Re: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Geeta Subramanian wrote: >        at > com.commvault.solr.handler.extraction.CVExtractingDocumentLoader.load(CVExtractingDocumentLoader.java:349) Looks like you're using a custom update handler. Perhaps that's accidentally hanging onto memory? -Yonik http://lu

Re: Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse

http://www.lucidimagination.com/developers/articles/setting-up-apache-solr-in- eclipse On Thursday 17 March 2011 17:17:30 Geeta Subramanian wrote: > Hi, > > Can some please let me know the steps on how can I debug the solr code in > my eclipse? > > I tried to compile the source, use the jars

Re: memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

Hi, 25*100MB=2.5GB will most likely fail with just 4GB of heap space. But consecutive single `pushes` as you call it, of 25MB documents should work fine. Heap memory will only drop after the garbage collector comes along. Cheers, On Thursday 17 March 2011 17:12:46 Geeta Subramanian wrote: > Hi

Info about Debugging SOLR in Eclipse

Hi, Can some please let me know the steps on how can I debug the solr code in my eclipse? I tried to compile the source, use the jars and place in tomcat where I am running solr. And do remote debugging, but it did not stop at any break point. I also tried to write a sample standalone java clas

memory not getting released in tomcat after pushing large documents

Hi, I am very new to SOLR and facing a lot of issues when using SOLR to push large documents. I have solr running in tomcat. I have allocated about 4gb memory (-Xmx) but I am pushing about twenty five 100 mb documents and gives heap space and fails. Also I tried pushing just 1 document. It went

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Yeah, I'm not sure how you could do it with DIH, if that's what you're using. (If it's XML, maybe you can XSLT it before it even goes to DIH, and have the XSLT take the greatest/least value in the input and stick it in additional XML element?) I do my indexing simply in an external procedural/

Re: Parent-child options

The standard answer, which is a kind of de-normalizing, is to index tokens like this: red_10 red_11orange_12 in another field, you could do these things with size first: 10_red 11_red 12_orange Now if you want to see what sizes of red you have, you can do a facet query with facet.prefi

Re: Replication slows down massively during high load

Hi Bill, > You could always rsync the index dir and reload (old scripts). I used them previously but was getting problems with them. The application querying the Solr doesn't cause enough load on it to trigger the issue. Yet. > But this is still something we should investigate. Indeed :-) > Se

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

> Better to fix it up so it's predictable and reliable instead, no? Yes, you are absolutely right. Thats why I'm looking into this. But how would i stuff, say always author_1, from a multi-valued field into a single-valued (string or text) field? Ok, another solution comes up to my mind. Writin

FuzzyQuery rewrite

Rewriting fuzzy queries in spellchecker index is a good practice? When I rewrite these queries in the main index, the rewriting time is about 3.5 - 4 secs. Now, this rewrites takes a few milliseconds.

Re: Parent-child options

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Hi, > > > > - Original Message >> From: Yonik Seeley >> Subject: Re: Parent-child options >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Otis Gospodnetic >>  wrote: >> > The dreaded parent-child without denormalization question.  What

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Perhaps easiest thing for you right now, that you can do in any version of Solr, is translate your data at indexing time so you don't have to sort on a multi-valued field. Put the stuff in an additional field for sorting, where at index time you only put the greatest or least value (your choic

Re: Solr Autosuggest help

Rahul, Go to your Solr Admin Analysis page, enter sci/tech, check appropriate check boxes, and see how sci/tech gets analyzed. This will lead you in the right direction. Otis Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/

Re: Parent-child options

Hi, - Original Message > From: Yonik Seeley > Subject: Re: Parent-child options > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Otis Gospodnetic > wrote: > > The dreaded parent-child without denormalization question. What are one's > > options for the following example: > > > > parent: shoe

Re: Replication slows down massively during high load

You could always rsync the index dir and reload (old scripts). But this is still something we should investigate. I had this same issue on high load and never really found a solution. Did you try another Nic card? See if the Nic is configured right? Routing? Speed of transfer? Bill Bell Sent fr

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Hi Bill, yes DIH is in use. Thanks, Bernd Am 17.03.2011 16:09, schrieb Bill Bell: Do you use Dih handler? A script can do this easily. Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote: Good idea. Was also just looking into this area. Assuming my input record

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Hi Yonik, actually some applications "misused" sorting on a multiValued field, like VuFind. And as a matter oft fact also FAST doesn't support this because it doesn't make sense. FAST distinguishes between multiValue and singleValue by just adding the seperator-FieldAttribute to the field. So I m

Re: Replication slows down massively during high load

On Mar 17, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 3/17/2011 3:43 AM, Vadim Kisselmann wrote: Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the problem. The queries themselves are running fine. The problem is that the replications is crawling when there are many queries going on and that the replication

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Do you use Dih handler? A script can do this easily. Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote: > > Good idea. > Was also just looking into this area. > > Assuming my input record looks like this: > > >author_1 ; author_2 ; > author_3 > > > > Do

Re: Sorting on multiValued fields via function query

Aha, oh well, not quite as good/flexible as I hoped. Still, if lucene is now behaving somewhat more predictably/rationally when sorting on multi-valued fields, then I think, in response to your other email on a similar thread, perhaps SOLR-2339 is now a mistake. When lucene was returning com

Re: Sorting on multiValued fields via function query

By the way, this could be done automatically by Solr or Lucene behind the scenes. Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 17, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Bill Bell wrote: > Here is a work around. Stick the high value and low value into other fields. > Use those fields for sorting. > > Bill Bell > Sent fro

Re: Sorting on multiValued fields via function query

Here is a work around. Stick the high value and low value into other fields. Use those fields for sorting. Bill Bell Sent from mobile On Mar 17, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: >> Also... if lucene is already capable of sortin

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Good idea. Was also just looking into this area. Assuming my input record looks like this: author_1 ; author_2 ; author_3 Do you know if I can use something like this: ... ... To just double the input and make author multiValued and author_sort a string field? Regards Bernd

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote: > > Is there a way to have a kind of "casting" for copyField? > > I have author names in multiValued string field and need a sorting on it, > but sort on field is only for multiValued=false. > > I'm trying to get multiValued content from one f

Re: Sorting on multiValued fields via function query

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > Also... if lucene is already capable of sorting on multi-valued field by > choosing the largest value largest vs. smallest is presumably just > arbitrary there, there is presumably no performance implication to choosing > the smallest

Rename fields in a query

Given a Query object "(name:firefox name:opera)", is it possible 'rename' the fields names to, for example, "(content:firefox content:opera)"?

Re: from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote: > > Is there a way to have a kind of "casting" for copyField? > > I have author names in multiValued string field and need a sorting on it, > but sort on field is only for multiValued=false. > > I'm trying to get multiValued content from one fi

from multiValued field to non-multiValued field with copyField?

Is there a way to have a kind of "casting" for copyField? I have author names in multiValued string field and need a sorting on it, but sort on field is only for multiValued=false. I'm trying to get multiValued content from one field to a non-multiValued text or string field for sorting. And th

Re: Replication slows down massively during high load

On 3/17/2011 3:43 AM, Vadim Kisselmann wrote: Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the problem. The queries themselves are running fine. The problem is that the replications is crawling when there are many queries going on and that the replication speed stays low even after the load is gone.

Re: Parent-child options

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > The dreaded parent-child without denormalization question.  What are one's > options for the following example: > > parent: shoes > 3 children. each with 2 attributes/fields: color and size >  * color: red black orange >  * size: 10 11 12

Re: Using Solr 1.4.1 on most recent Tomcat 7.0.11

Pierre That is a very good point, I have been caught in the past by poor xml (RSS feeds) that included control characters before the ' I do have the xml preamble in my > config file in conf/Catalina/localhost/ and solr starts ok with Tomcat 7.0.8. > Haven't try with 7.0.11 yet. > > I wonder w

Re: hierarchical faceting, SOLR-792 - confused on config

On Mar 16, 2011, at 14:53 , Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > Interesting, any documentation on the PathTokenizer anywhere? Or just have to > find and look at the source? That's something I hadn't known about, which may > be useful to some stuff I've been working on depending on how it works.

Re: Solr Autosuggest help

hi, We have found that 'EnglishPorterFilterFactory' causes that issue. I believe that is used for stemming words. Once we commented that factory, it works fine. And another thing, currently I am checking about how the word 'sci/tech' will be indexed in solr. As mentioned in my previous email, if

Re: hierarchical faceting, SOLR-792 - confused on config

Yes, pivot faceting is committed to trunk. But is not part of upcoming 3.1 release. Erik On Mar 16, 2011, at 15:00 , McGibbney, Lewis John wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I have been reading about the progression of SOLR-792 into pivot faceting, > however can you expand to comment on > where i

RE: Using Solr 1.4.1 on most recent Tomcat 7.0.11

Hi François, Thank you for your reply. I had made a simple mistake of including comments before '', therefore I was getting a SAX error. As you have correctly pointed out, it is not essential to include the snippet as above in the context file (if using one), however it might be useful to know

Re: SOLR building problems

java version "1.6.0_21" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_21-b06) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 17.0-b16, mixed mode) -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-building-problems-tp2692916p2693574.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at

RE: Using Solr 1.4.1 on most recent Tomcat 7.0.11

I do have the xml preamble in my config file in conf/Catalina/localhost/ and solr starts ok with Tomcat 7.0.8. Haven't try with 7.0.11 yet. I wonder why your exception point to line 4 column 6, however. Shouldn't it point to line 1 column 1 ? Do you have some blank lines at the start of your

Re: i don't get why my index didn't grow more...

Without even looking at the different segment files, things look odd: You say that you optimize every day, yet I see segments up to 4 days old. Also look at all the segments_??? files... each represents a commit point of the index. So it looks like you have 16 snapshots (or commit points) of the in

Re: Using Solr 1.4.1 on most recent Tomcat 7.0.11

Lewis My update from tomcat 7.0.8 to 7.0.11 went with no hitches, I checked my context file and it does not have the xml preamble your has, specifically: '', Here is my context file: --- Hope this helps. Cheers François On Mar 16, 2011, at 2:38 PM, McGibbney, Lewis John wrote:

Re: Multiple Blocked threads on UnInvertedField.getUnInvertedField() & SegmentReader$CoreReaders.getTermsReader

Hi Yonik, I have another question related to fieldValueCache. When we uninvert a facet field, and if the termInstances = 0 for a particular field, then also it gets added to the FieldValueCache. What is the reason for caching facet fields with termInstances=0? In our case, a lot of time is being

SOLR-2242-distinctFacet.patch

Hi, I want to enquire the patch for namedistinct(SOLR-2242-distinctFacet.patch) available with solr4.0 trunk On Monday 14 March 2011 08:05 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: It's not easy if you have lots of facet values (in my case, can even be up to a million), but there is no way built-in

Re: SOLR building problems

What Java version do you have installed? (java -version) Best Erick On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:30 AM, royr wrote: > Hello, > > The apache wiki gives me this information: > > Skip this section if you have a binary distribution of Solr. These > instructions will building Solr from source, if you ha

Re: Error: "Unbuffered entity enclosing request can not be repeated."

Hi, Eric! I suspect that the problem resides in Tomcat. I think that the connection server-client times out. What happens if you submit the 9th batch first? I'm wondering if the > 9th batch is just mal-formed and has nothing to do with the > previous batches. The 9th batch is ok, like the o

Re: i don't get why my index didn't grow more...

This page: http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_2/fileformats.html#file-names, when combined with what Yonik said may help you figure it out... And if you're still stumped, please post the and definitions you used Best Erick On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Robert Petersen wrote: > OK I have

Re: Error: "Unbuffered entity enclosing request can not be repeated."

What happens if you submit the 9th batch first? I'm wondering if the 9th batch is just mal-formed and has nothing to do with the previous batches. As to the time, what merge factor are you using? And how are you committing? Via autocommit parameters or explicitly or not at all? Best Erick On

Re: Version Incompatibility(Invalid version (expected 2, but 1) or the data in not in 'javabin' format)

On Thursday 17 March 2011 03:18 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: I am using Solr 4.0 api to search from index (made using solr1.4 version). I am getting error Invalid version (expected 2, but 1) or the data in not in 'javabin' format. Can anyone help me to

SOLR building problems

Hello, The apache wiki gives me this information: Skip this section if you have a binary distribution of Solr. These instructions will building Solr from source, if you have a nightly tarball or have checked out the trunk from subversion at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk. Assume

Re: hierarchical faceting, SOLR-792 - confused on config

On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 18:36 +0100, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Sorry, I missed the original mail on this thread > > I put together that hierarchical faceting wiki page a couple > of years ago when helping a customer evaluate SOLR-64 vs. > SOLR-792 vs.other approaches. Since then, SOLR-792 morphed >

Re: Replication slows down massively during high load

Hello Shawn, Primary assumption:  You have a 64-bit OS and a 64-bit JVM. >Jepp, it's running 64-bit Linux with 64-bit JVM It sounds to me like you're I/O bound, because your machine cannot keep enough of your index in RAM.  Relative to your 100GB index, you only have a maximum of 14G

Re: Sorting 0 values last

Okay. When I use the map function with ..&sort=map(price, 0, 0, 0, 1) desc then solr output an error: 17.03.2011 09:42:58 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log SCHWERWIEGEND: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Missing sort order. at org.apache.solr.search.QueryParsing.parseSort(Quer

Re: Solr Autosuggest help

Hi, One more query. Currently in the autosuggestion Solr returns words like below: googl googl _ googl search googl chrome googl map The last letter seems to be missing in autosuggestion. I have send the query as "?qt=/terms&terms=true&terms.fl=mydata&terms.lower=goog&terms.prefix=goog". The f

Re: What request handlers to use for query strings in Chinese or Japanese?

That's the job your analyzer should concern 2011/3/17 Andy : > Hi, > > For my Solr server, some of the query strings will be in Asian languages such > as Chinese or Japanese. > > For such query strings, would the Standard or Dismax request handler work? My > understanding is that both the Stand