On 10/19/2010 2:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
The formats are not currently compatible. The first priority was to get
the format fixed so it was using true UTF8 (instead of Java's bastardized
modified UTF8) in a way that would generate a clear error if people
attempted to use an older SolrJ to
Is that right?
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:08 PM, findbestopensource <
findbestopensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have posted an article Lucene vs Solr
> http://www.findbestopensource.com/article-detail/lucene-vs-solr
>
> Please feel free to add your comments.
>
> Regards
> Aditya
> w
Yeah, I know.
Does anyone could tell me wich one is the good way?
Regards,
> What an interesting application :-)
>
> Dennis Gearon
>
> Signature Warning
>
> It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so yo
Just a test mail to check if my mails are reaching the ML.
I dont know, but my mails are failing to reach the ML with the following
error :
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver you
Hi,
I have some problem with combining the query with multiple parital-word
searching in dismax handler. In order to make multiple partial word
searching, I use EdgeNGramFilterFactory, and my query must be something like
this: "name_ngram:sun name_ngram:hot" in q.alt combined with my search
handle
I suspect, but don't know for sure, that you need to modify it to
*:* - tag:test
but I confess I'm not at all sure that it'll work in this context..
Best
Erick
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Kevin Cunningham <
kcunning...@telligent.com> wrote:
> I'm using Solr 1.4 with the standard reque
This is something most everybody has to get over when transitioning from the
DB
world to Solr/Lucene. The schema describes the #possible# fields in the
document.
There is absolutely no requirement that #every# document in the index have
all these fields in them (unless #you# define it so with .
So
The main disadvantage of index-time boosting is that you must reindex your
corpus entirely if you want to alter the boost factors. And there's no very
good
way to anticipate what boost factors will give you the results you want
I wonder if you could cheat and do some basic string processing on
On Oct 19, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Pradeep Singh wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2519
>
> If I change my code as per 2519
>
> to have this -
>
> public double[] coords(double latitude, double longitude) {
>double rlat = Math.toRadians(latitude);
>double rlong = Math.to
Hi All,
Just wanted to post an update on where we stand with all the requests for
new features
List of Features Requested In SOLR PECL Extension
1. Ability to Send Custom Requests to Custom URLS other than select, update,
terms etc.
2. Ability to add files (pdf, office documents etc)
3. Windows
> I am a student and I am trying to run evaluation for TREC
> format document. I
> have the judgments. I would like to have the output of my
> queries for use
> with trec_eval software. Can someone please point me how to
> make Solr spit
> out output in this format? Or at least point me to some
> m
Hi
I am trying to use xi:include in my solrconfig.xml.
For example:
http://localhost/config/config.aspx"; />
This works fine, as long as config.aspx exists, and as long as it returns valid
xml.
Sometimes though, the config.aspx can fail, and return invalid xml. Then I get
a problem, as Solr's
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2519
If I change my code as per 2519
to have this -
public double[] coords(double latitude, double longitude) {
double rlat = Math.toRadians(latitude);
double rlong = Math.toRadians(longitude);
double nlat = rlong * Math.cos(rlat);
re
> Does not work:
>
> name="fq">-tag:test
>
Can you append &echoParams=all to your search url and verify that that
fq=-tag:test included in response?
Ron,
In the past I've worked with SOLR for a product that required the ability to
search - separately - for companies, people, business lists, and a
combination of the previous three. In designing this in SOLR, I found that
using a combination of explicit field definitions and dynamic fields (
htt
Oh you are constructing the string 'fly +body:away' in your StemFilter?
Just to make sure, does this q=+body:(fly away) return your document?
And analysis.jsp (at query time) displays 'fly +body:away' from the string
'flyaway'?
I don't know why are you doing this but your stemfilter should return
Hi all-
I have a newbie design question about documents, especially with SQL databases.
I am trying to set up Solr to go against a database that, for example, has
"items" and "people". The way I see it, and I don't know if this is right or
not (thus the question), is that I see both as separate
: The CHANGES.txt file in branch_3x says that the javabin format has changed in
: Solr 3.1, so you need to update SolrJ as well as Solr. Is the SolrJ included
: in 3.1 compatible with both 3.1 and 1.4.1? If not, that's going to make a
: graceful upgrade of my replicated distributed installation
: We will take this approach in our production environment but meanwhile I am
: curious if this issue will be addressed: it seems the new/first searchers do
: not really buy any performance benefits because it uses so much memory,
: especially at core loading time.
There's nothing inheriently wro
: Subject: Documents and cores
: References: <4cbd939c.3020...@atcult.it>
:
: In-Reply-To:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh ema
Hi guys,
I read all suggestions and I did some tests, and finally, the indexing
process is working.
I did the extraction of initial character of three fields. Here are the
functions:
function extraiInicial(valor) {
if (valor != "" && valor != null) {
valor = valor.substring(0
You are correct. The query needs to match as a phrase. It doesn't need
to match "everything". Note that if a value is:
"long sentence with my blue rabbit in it",
then query "my blue rabbit" will also match as a phrase, for phrase
boosting or query purposes.
Jonathan
Jason Brown wrote:
H
Hi - I have a multi-value field, so say for example it consists of
'my black cat'
'my white dog'
'my blue rabbit'
The field is whitespace parsed when put into the index.
I have a phrase query boost configured on this field which I understand kicks
in when my search term is found entirely in
Hi Guys,
Let me describe you the use case for our search applications:
a- The user enter to the search application to latest 20 document are
displayed.
b- A Tag cloud component is populate with the facet available from a.
c- The user type something in the text box.
d- The documents are tagged
Hi folks, I was wondering if there is any native support for posting gzipped
files to solr?
i.e. I'm testing a project where we inject our log files into solr for
indexing, these logs files are gzipped, and I figure it would take less
network bandwith to inject gzipped files directl. is there a
I don't know anything about the TREC format document, but i think if you
want text output, you can do it by using the
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/XsltResponseWriter to transform the xml to a
text...
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Valli Indraganti <
valli.indraga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
-Original Message-
From: Jason Brown
Sent: Tue 19/10/2010 13:45
To: d...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Dismax phrase boosts on multi-value fields
Hi - I have a multi-value field, so say for example it consists of
'my black cat'
'my white dog'
'my blue rabbit'
The field is whitespace p
If I understand your use case correctly. You will have to write your own
response writer.
Only the below response writers are available .
Query response writer
Description
XMLResponseWriter
The most general-purpose response format outputs its results in XML, as
demonstrated by the blogging a
Hello!
I am a student and I am trying to run evaluation for TREC format document. I
have the judgments. I would like to have the output of my queries for use
with trec_eval software. Can someone please point me how to make Solr spit
out output in this format? Or at least point me to some material
I'm using Solr 1.4 with the standard request handler and attempting to apply a
negative fq for all requests via the "appends" elements but its not being
applied. Is this an intended limitation? I looked in JIRA for an existing
issue but nothing jumped out.
Works fine:
tag:test
Hi,
we are looking at Solr+Zookeeper as the architecture for enabling
federated searches among geographically distributed data centers.
I wonder if anybody can comment on what is the status of enabling timeouts with
respect to distributed searches in a Solr-Zookeeper environment. Specifi
Hi Ken,
yes I'm a java developer so I think I should be able to do that but I
was wondering if there's a way to solve my issue without coding.
Problem is that I need to adjust this query in a short time and in
addition I cannot justify (at this stage of the project) additional
software art
Hi all-
I have a newbie design question about documents, especially with SQL databases.
I am trying to set up Solr to go against a database that, for example, has
"items" and "people". The way I see it, and I don't know if this is right or
not (thus the question), is that I see both as separate
Andrea,
Another approach, aside of Markus' suggestion, would be to create your own
handler that could intercept the query and perform whatever necessary
transformations that you need at query time. However, that would require
having Java knowledge (which I make no assumption).
Regards,
Ken
It l
Y-E-A-H! I think it's so!
Markus, what are disadvantages of this boosting strategy?
Thanks a lot
Andrea
Il 19/10/2010 16:25, Markus Jelsma ha scritto:
Index-time boosting maybe?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22field.22
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 04
Index-time boosting maybe?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Optional_attributes_for_.22field.22
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 04:23:46 pm Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> thanks for your response...unfortunately it doesn't solve my problem.
>
> I cannot chnage the client behaviour
Hi Ken,
thanks for your response...unfortunately it doesn't solve my problem.
I cannot chnage the client behaviour so the query must be a query and not only
the query terms.
In this scenario, It would be great, for example, if I could declare the
boost in the schema field definitionbut
Hi Ken,
thanks for your response...unfortunately it doesn't solve my problem.
I cannot chnage the client behaviour so the query must be a query and not only
the query terms.
In this scenario, It would be great, for example, if I could declare the boost
in the schema field definitionbut I th
Hey thanks Tommy. To be more specific, I'm trying to use SolrJ in a
clojure project. When I try to use SolrJ using what you showed me, I
get errors saying lucene classes can't be found etc.. Is there a way
to build everything SolrJ (snapshot-4.0) needs into one jar?
Matt
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1
Andrea,
Using the SOLR dismax query handler, you could set up queries like this to
boost on fields of your choice. Basically, the q parameter would be the
query terms (without the field definitions, and a qf (Query Fields)
parameter that you use to define your boost(s):
http://wiki.apache.org/solr
Hi all,
I have a client that is sending this query
q=title:history AND author:joyce
is it possible to "transform" at runtime this query in this way:
q=title:history^10 AND author:joyce^5
?
Best regards,
Andrea
On Oct 19, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> I/my team will have to look at that and decode it,LOL! I get some of it.
>
> The database version returns 1 row, with the answer.
>
> What does this return and how fast is it on BIG indexes?
rows=0 returns 0 rows, but the total count will be
You never get full control of commits, as Solr will auto-commit anyway whenever
the (configurable) input buffer is full. With the current architecture you
cannot really trust adds or commits to 100% certainly be successful, because
the server may have been restarted between an add and commit() w
I now used textfield...and it works, so thanks! :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Uppercase-and-lowercase-queries-tp1731349p1731423.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, and reindex. And i suggest not to use `string` as the name of the
fieldType as it will confuse later.
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 12:25:53 pm Pradeep Singh wrote:
> Use text field.
>
> On Tue, O
Because you need to reindex.
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 12:19:53 pm PeterKerk wrote:
> I want to query on cityname. This works when I query for example:
> "Boston"
>
> But when I query "boston" it didnt show any results. In the database is
> stored: "Boston".
>
> So I thought: I should change
Use text field.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:19 AM, PeterKerk wrote:
>
> I want to query on cityname. This works when I query for example:
> "Boston"
>
> But when I query "boston" it didnt show any results. In the database is
> stored: "Boston".
>
> So I thought: I should change the filter on this
I want to query on cityname. This works when I query for example:
"Boston"
But when I query "boston" it didnt show any results. In the database is
stored: "Boston".
So I thought: I should change the filter on this field to make everything
lowercase.
The field definition for city is:
So I cha
Thanks Otis and Markus for your input.
I will check it out today.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Unfortunately, Nutch still uses Tika 0.7 in 1.2 and trunk. Nutch needs to
> be
> upgraded to Tika 0.8 (when it's released or just the current trunk). Also,
> the
> Boilerpipe
Unfortunately, Nutch still uses Tika 0.7 in 1.2 and trunk. Nutch needs to be
upgraded to Tika 0.8 (when it's released or just the current trunk). Also, the
Boilerpipe API needs to be exposed through Nutch configuration, which extractor
can be used, which parameters need to be set etc.
Upgrading
You could include a common file with the JdbcDataSource
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml#XInclude) or add the password
as a property in solr.xml in the container scope
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#Configuration) so it will be
available to all cores.
Personally, I use a single co
According to the DIH wiki, delta-import is only supported by sql
(http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Using_delta-import_comman
d-1)
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:20 AM
To: solr-user
52 matches
Mail list logo
