I am using the following code to send out solr request from a webapp. please
notice the timeout setting:
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
HttpMethod method = new GetMethod(solrReq);
method.getParams().setParameter(HttpConnectionParams.SO_TIMEOUT,
I also added the following timeout for the connection, still not working:
client.getParams().setSoTimeout(httpClientPingTimeout);
client.getParams().setConnectionManagerTimeout(httpClientPingTimeout);
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/
Erick Erickson wrote:
> You can do some interesting things with payloads. You could index a
> particular value as the payload that identified the "kind" of word it was,
> where "kind" is something you define. Then at query time, you could
> boost depending on what part kind of word you identified i
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
> java -Xmx1024m -jar start.jar
Hmm, could you try increasing the RAM, though this out to be enough?
Maybe I missed this earlier, but what is the size of the data being indexed?
Regards,
Gora
Hi, all.
I got some question about solrconfig.xml.
I have 10 fields in a document for index.
(Suppose that field names are f1, f2, ... , f10.)
Some user will want to search in field f1 and f5.
Another user will want to search in field f2, f3 and f7.
I am going to use dismax handler for this.
How
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:07 PM, PeterKerk wrote:
>
> Ok, so does this actually say:
> for now you have to do calculations based on bounding box instead of great
> circle?
I tried to make the documentation a little simpler... there's
- geofilt... filters within a radius of "d" km (i.e. "great c
Correct. We used the Latin1 filter back then.
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I am using solr 1.3. I get the below mentioned error when included the
: solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory on 'text' field while index and query
: time:
I fairly certain ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory did not exist in Solr 1.3.
-Ho
2007-06-19 09:08:48
Solr's input format is '2007-06-19T09:08:48Z'.
More to the point: you are creating a string and passing that in. The
date type will accept this, but the DIH has code to accept Java JDBC
datetime values directly. So, in your select you want to somehow cast
your field data
Hmmm. If this is a Solr date, then these are not in a proper Solr date
format, see:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/schema/DateField.html
Solr took the path of eliminating all the fuzziness about times and
#requiring#
that all dates be in Zulu time since that's unambiguous. Or at
Ok, so does this actually say:
for now you have to do calculations based on bounding box instead of great
circle?
And the fact that on top of the page it says "Solr4.0", does that imply I
cant use this right now? Or where could I find the latest trunk for this?
(and ofcourse this might all change
You may want to check the docs, which were recently updated to reflect
the state of trunk:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:49 PM, PeterKerk wrote:
>
> Hey Grant,
>
> Just came accross this post of yours.
>
> Run a query
Hey Grant,
Just came accross this post of yours.
Run a query: http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=_val_:"recip(dist(2,
store, vector(34.0232,-81.0664)),1,1,0)"&fl=*,score // Note, I just updated
this, it used to be point instead of vector and that was wrong.
What does your suggested query ac
: Is it possible to have certain query terms not effect score, if that
: same query term is present in a field? For example, I have an index of
that use case is precisely what the DisjunctionMaxQuery (generated by
the dismax parser) does for you if you set the "tie" param to "0"
when one of the
You mean I should actually read the #entire# post before responding? What an
idea!
Thanks for helping out here, I was completely misleading Ahson.
Erick
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Right. You're requiring that every document have an ID (via uniqueKey),
> but
>
: Subject: Accented Search in Solr
: References:
: In-Reply-To:
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the
: I am using solr 1.3. I get the below mentioned error when included the
: solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory on 'text' field while index and query
: time:
I fairly certain ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory did not exist in Solr 1.3.
-Hoss
With solrj doing a more like this query for a missing document:
/mlt?q=docId:SomeMissingId
always throws a null pointer exception:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Error
executing query
at
org
.apache
.solr.client.solrj.request.QueryRequest.process(Query
That must be it, thanks for the find. The patch must not have made it into
3.1 yet. I'll take a look at the diff and see what I can make work for our app
in the meantime.
On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> I believe it was this one
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
Hi,
I would advise you to get involved in the SolrCloud initiative (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud) and start designing a native indexing
distributor component.
I envision something like an integration in UpdateHandler which knows about all
collections and shards from ZK config, and
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Ken Stanley wrote:
> >
> > > > If you are using Solr via PHP and would like to see any new features
> in
> > > the
> > > > extension please feel free to send me a note.
> >
>
> I'm new to this list, but in seeing this thread - and using PHP SOLR - I
> wanted to m
EFF was written in 2007. It's quite solid. It can be used for sorting
and boosts. I don't know if function queries can use it. The value
will not be returned in queries.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Roland Villemoes
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have an databasefield that changes a lot which I want to u
For multi-tenant, all customers share the same words for text fields.
A customer's search relevance might be useless.
Also, spelling & autosuggest recommendations come from all of the
entries in a field, so the customers can see each other's words.
There are other quirks in memory and cache manage
Hi All,
I am using solr 1.3. I get the below mentioned error when included the
solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory on 'text' field while index and query time:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory'
at
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResou
Exactly yep. I think that'll work nicely. Thanks Jonathan,
Matt
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> You can identify what words are the city name at index time, because they're
> the ones in the "city" field, right? So why not just strip those words out at
> index time?
Hi,
I am thinking of creating a webservice for performing push indexing across
multiple solr instance.
This is our SOLR configuration
3 Master instance ---> 3 slave instance.
Each master maintains index of a particular item type.
This is my idea..
We have a update UI which will push the SOL
I am not sure there's any way to get query-time multi-word synonyms to
work right, because of the way the standard and dismax query parsers
'pre-tokenize' (I don't know what the solr developers call this
phenomenon? I call it "pre-tokenizing"). If you use the field query
parser instead, it w
I believe it was this one
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1824
> The natives have been getting restless since I turned off the highlighter
> on our application quite a few months ago.In an attempt to rectify
> that I've migrated to Solr 3.1 (found it quite stable so far) in hopes
The natives have been getting restless since I turned off the highlighter on
our application quite a few months ago.In an attempt to rectify that I've
migrated to Solr 3.1 (found it quite stable so far) in hopes to use the vector
highlighter.So far, I'm not seeing a significant performa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the right way for installing Tika with Solr 1.4?
Where do those jar files go?
./tika-app/target/tika-app-0.7.jar
./tika-bundle/target/tika-bundle-0.7.jar
./tika-core/target/tika-core-0.7.jar
./tika-parsers/target/tika-parsers-0.7.jar
Documen
>
> > > If you are using Solr via PHP and would like to see any new features in
> > the
> > > extension please feel free to send me a note.
>
I'm new to this list, but in seeing this thread - and using PHP SOLR - I
wanted to make a suggestion that - while minor - I think would greatly
improve the
Hi all,
I am pretty new in solr. I want to configure synonym for forwarding result
(for exact match).
my schema is :
There is name field which is define as text_sync. When I am searching by
"newyork show" its working fine and givin
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Stefan Matheis <
matheis.ste...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Isreal,
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>
> > If you are using Solr via PHP and would like to see any new features in
> the
> > extension please feel free to send me a note.
>
>
>
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Peter Blokland wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:03:07AM -0400, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>
> > If you are using Solr via PHP and would like to see any new features in
> the
> > extension please feel free to send me a note.
>
> I'm currently testing a setup wit
Some very interesting scenarious cropping up here. Sounds to me like a minor
architectural changes will be in order for them to be addressed.
What's the usual delay from stage one to stage 2. IF that were some kind of
constant value, old versions could be kept around for approx doulbe that time.
This is a different issue. You are seeing the latency between master index
update and replication to slave(s).
Solve this by pointing your monitoring script directly to slave instead of
master.
What this thread is about is a potential difference in state during the
execution of a single sharded
Answered my own question. Instead of naming each core in the
replication handler, you use a variable instead:
http://solr.mydomain.com:8983/solr/${solr.core.name}/replication
00:00:60
That will get all of your cores replicating.
-- C
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Christopher
On 10/11/2010 6:32 PM, Peter Keegan wrote:
When Solr does a distributed search across shards, it does this in 2 phases
(correct me if I'm wrong):
1. 1st query to get the docIds and facet counts
2. 2nd query to retrieve the stored fields of the top hits
The problem here is that the index could
Afternoon,
I wonder if anyone could shed any light on this one that's stumping me.
I have a table that is storing dates using seconds since epoch, so something
like this:
1182262980
When I first wrote my queries for DIH it was complaining about this and rightly
so as I had a mapper thus
So
We are working on the Solr trunk and have a Master and Two slaves
configuration .
Our indexing consists of Periodic Full and Incremental index building on the
master and replication on the slaves.
When a Full indexing (clean rebuilt) is performed, we always end with an
extra index folder c
I'm sorry to late reply.Thanks for the reply.
I want to control the ranking of each keyword freely in a large number
of documents.
- regardless of the actual keywords in the document.
- and doesn't using XML configure file.
example:)
There are Doc1,Doc2,Doc3Doc1000 - more than thousand.
It
You can identify what words are the city name at index time, because they're
the ones in the "city" field, right? So why not just strip those words out at
index time? Create a new field, name_search, and search on that, not name.
Doc 1
name => "Holiday Inn"
name_search => "Holiday Inn" [ana
Thanks for the feedback. I thought about stop words but since I have a
lot of documents spanning lots of different countries, I won't know
all of the possible cities so stop-words could get hard to manage.
Also, the city name is in the same field. I think I might try creating
a new field called nam
Hi Isreal,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> If you are using Solr via PHP and would like to see any new features in the
> extension please feel free to send me a note.
we actually tried to grab some informations from solr's dataimport-page, but
therefore we had to generate
java -Xmx1024m -jar start.jar
> Thanks a ton Eric and Iorixxx.
> Since I used DIH to import XML data, boosting was not
> reflected in score.
> When I used /update to import XML data, boosting was
> considered for scoring
> and able to see the intended data on top 10 results.
> Could you please let me know how to make boosting v
Hi
I have an databasefield that changes a lot which I want to use for ranking my
results. Is the ExternalFileField the way to go and is it supported in the
latest stable release of SOLR? (Do I have to go for trunk, or should I stick
with 1.4 - the lucidWorks certified distribution?)
My idea is
Hi Olivier,
the index size is relative big and you enabled replication after startup:
startup
This could explain why the slave is replicating from the very beginning.
Are the index versions/generations the same? (via command or
admin/replication)
If not, the slaves tries to replicate and if that
hi,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:03:07AM -0400, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> If you are using Solr via PHP and would like to see any new features in the
> extension please feel free to send me a note.
I'm currently testing a setup with Solr via PHP, and was wondering if
support for the ExtractingRequestH
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>
> On 11.10.2010, at 07:03, Israel Ekpo wrote:
>
> > I am currently working on a couple of bug fixes for the Solr PECL
> extension
> > that will be available in the next release 0.9.12 sometime this month.
> >
> > http://pecl.php.net/packa
Hello Peter,
On the slave server http://slave/solr/core0/admin/replication/index.jsp
Poll Interval00:30:00
Local Index Index Version: 1284026488242, Generation: 13102
Location: /solr/multicore/core0/data/index
Size: 26.9 GB
Times Replicated Since Startup: 289
Previous Replication
Hi Eick, thanks for replying.
Yes I do commit after deleting-by-query, but since the IndexReader is an
internal (at lest for my app point of view), is there a way to reopen it
(or a new one) when I do a commit?
Claudio
On 10/11/2010 10:08 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
I'd guess that after you d
Hi Olivier,
maybe the slave replicates after startup? check replication status here:
http://localhost/solr/admin/replication/index.jsp
what is your poll frequency (could you paste the replication part)?
Regards,
Peter.
> Hello,
>
> I setup a server for the replication of Solr. I used 2 cores an
Basically, for a large number of users would using a single index or using a
multi core approach be better?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Tharindu Mathew wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm sort of looking in to a deployment which will support multi tenancy.
> This means that there will be 1000s of
Thanks a ton Eric and Iorixxx.
Since I used DIH to import XML data, boosting was not reflected in score.
When I used /update to import XML data, boosting was considered for scoring
and able to see the intended data on top 10 results.
Could you please let me know how to make boosting value to be re
You can safely set it to 0 (default) for solr.Textfield types that you don't do
sloppy phrase queries on.
From the schema.xml comments:
> The optional positionIncrementGap puts space between multiple fields
> of this type on the same document, with the purpose of preventing
> false phrase matchin
Hello,
I setup a server for the replication of Solr. I used 2 cores and for
each one I specified the replication. I followed the tutorial on
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication.
The replication is OK for each cores. However the CPU is used to 100% on
the slave. The master and slave a
Thank you Markus for your quick reply.
Do you have a recommendation|suggestion about positionIncrementGap?
Paolo
Markus Jelsma wrote:
You can omit norms in field that you only facet on. The matrix only lists
mandatory values for those parameters.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 10:15:35 am Paol
You can omit norms in field that you only facet on. The matrix only lists
mandatory values for those parameters.
On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 10:15:35 am Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Hi,
> I am not completely sure on what's the recommended setting for fields
> used for faceting regarding omitNorms and
This is what FAST does in ESP. When a new version of a partition is built, it
is staged in its own process and co-exists alongside the old one. The
query-dispatcher sees both and routes traffic based on requested "generation
id".
Should probably not invest in such a feature until there's a clea
Hi,
I am not completely sure on what's the recommended setting for fields
used for faceting regarding omitNorms and potitionIncrementGap.
Should I used omitNorms="true"?
What about positionIncrementGap?
At the moment I have this in my schema.xml:
stored="false" multiValued="true" />
I'm not sure ... just reading it yesterday night ...
but isn't the unapplied patch from Harish
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12400054/SOLR-680.patch
what you want?
Regards,
Peter.
> Running 1.4.1.
>
> I'm able to execute stats queries against multi-valued fields, but when
> giv
61 matches
Mail list logo
