Exactly yep. I think that'll work nicely. Thanks Jonathan, Matt
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> wrote: > You can identify what words are the city name at index time, because they're > the ones in the "city" field, right? So why not just strip those words out at > index time? Create a new field, name_search, and search on that, not name. > > Doc 1 > name => "Holiday Inn" > name_search => "Holiday Inn" [analyzed, perhaps lowercase normalized etc] > city => "Denver" > > Doc 2 > name => "Holiday Inn, Denver" > name_search => "Holiday Inn" > city => "Denver" > > Jonathan > > ________________________________________ > From: Matt Mitchell [goodie...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:24 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: dynamic "stop" words? > > Thanks for the feedback. I thought about stop words but since I have a > lot of documents spanning lots of different countries, I won't know > all of the possible cities so stop-words could get hard to manage. > Also, the city name is in the same field. I think I might try creating > a new field called name_no_city, and at index time just strip the city > name out? > > Matt > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Geert-Jan Brits <gbr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That might work, although depending on your use-case it might be hard to >> have a good controlled vocab on citynames (hotel metropole bruxelles, hotel >> metropole brussels, hotel metropole brussel, etc.) Also 'hotel paris >> bruxelles' stinks... >> >> given your example: >> >>> Doc 1 >>> name => "Holiday Inn" >>> city => "Denver" >>> >>> Doc 2 >>> name => "Holiday Inn, Denver" >>> city => "Denver" >>> >>> q=name:(Holiday Inn, Denver) >> >> turning it upside down, perhaps an alternative would be to query on: >> q=name:Holiday Inn+city:Denver >> >> and configure field 'name' in such a way that doc1 and doc2 score the same. >> I believe that must be possible, just not sure how to config it exactly at >> the moment. >> >> Of course, it depends on your scenario if you have enough knowlegde on the >> clientside to transform: >> q=name:(Holiday Inn, Denver) to q=name:Holiday Inn+city:Denver >> >> Hth, >> Geert-Jan >> >> 2010/10/9 Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> >> >>> Matt, >>> >>> The first thing that came to my mind is that this might be interesting to >>> try >>> with a dictionary (of city names) if this example is not a made-up one. >>> >>> >>> Otis >>> ---- >>> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch >>> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ---- >>> > From: Matt Mitchell <goodie...@gmail.com> >>> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> > Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 11:22:36 AM >>> > Subject: dynamic "stop" words? >>> > >>> > Is it possible to have certain query terms not effect score, if that >>> > same query term is present in a field? For example, I have an index of >>> > hotels. Each hotel has a name and city. If the name of a hotel has the >>> > name of the city in it's "name" field, I want to completely ignore >>> > that and not have it influence score. >>> > >>> > Example: >>> > >>> > Doc 1 >>> > name => "Holiday Inn" >>> > city => "Denver" >>> > >>> > Doc 2 >>> > name => "Holiday Inn, Denver" >>> > city => "Denver" >>> > >>> > q=name:(Holiday Inn, Denver) >>> > >>> > I'd like those docs to have the same score in the response. I don't >>> > want Doc2 to have a higher score, just because it has all of the query >>> > terms. >>> > >>> > Is this possible without using stop words? I hope this makes sense! >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Matt >>> > >>> >> >
