On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Christopher Ball <
christopher.b...@metaheuristica.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to get a list of highly unusual terms or phrases (for example a
> TF of 1 or 2) within an entire index (essentially this would be the inverse
> of how Luke gives 'top terms' on t
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:16 AM, dipti khullar wrote:
>
> This assettype is variable. It can have around 6 values at a time.
> But this is true that we apply facet mostly on just one field - assettype.
>
>
Ian has a good point. You are faceting on assettype and you are also
filtering on it so you
Hey Ian
This assettype is variable. It can have around 6 values at a time.
But this is true that we apply facet mostly on just one field - assettype.
Any idea if the use of date range queries is expensive? Also if Shalin can
put in some comments on
"sorting by date was pretty rough on CPU", I can
Thanks for the response, Shalin. I am still in two minds over doing it
"inside" Solr versus "outside".
I'll get back with more questions, if any.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Avlesh Singh
Hello,
I am trying to get a list of highly unusual terms or phrases (for example a
TF of 1 or 2) within an entire index (essentially this would be the inverse
of how Luke gives 'top terms' on the 'Overview' tab).
I see how I can do this within a specific query using the Term Vector
Componen
On 1/5/10 12:46 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
sitename:XYZ OR sitename:"All Sites") AND (localeid:1237400589415) AND
> ((assettype:Gallery)) AND (rbcategory:"ABC XYZ" ) AND (startdate:[* TO
> 2009-12-07T23:59:00Z] AND enddate:[2009-12-07T00:00:00Z TO
> *])&rows=9&start=63&sort=date
> desc
You must have been searching old documentation - I think tika 0,3+ has
support for the new MS formats. but don't take my word for it - why
don't you build tika and try it?
-Peter
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Roland Villemoes
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone who knows how to index the latest MS o
FYI:
I have found the root of this behaviour. It has to do with a test patch I've
been working on for working 'round pre SOLR-219 (case insensitive wildcard
searching).
With the test patch switched out, it works as expected. Although the case
insensitive wildcard search reverts to pre-SOLR
Hi Yonik,
Thanks for your quick reply.
No, the queries themselves aren't in quotes.
Since I sent the initial email, I have managed to get non-leading wildcard
queries to work with this, but by unexpected means (for me at least :-).
If I add a LowerCaseFilterFactory to the fieldType,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Peter S wrote:
> When I query: "Something" or "Something Else" or "*thing" or "*omething*",
> I get back the expected results.
> If, however, I query: "Some*" or "S*" or "s*" etc, I get no results (although
> this type of non-leading wildcard works fine with oth
Hello,
There are lots of questions and answers in the forum regarding varying wildcard
behaviour, but I haven't been able to find any
that address this particular behaviour. Perhaps someone could help?
Problem:
I have a fieldType that only goes through a KeywordTokenizer at index time, to
ensure
Hi -
Something doesn't make sense to me here:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:55 AM, dipti khullar wrote:
> - optimize runs on master in every 7 minutes
> - using postOptimize , we execute snapshooter on master
> - snappuller/snapinstaller on 2 slaves runs after every 10 minutes
>
>
Why would you optim
Thank you Ahmet.
Is there any way I can configure Solr to always use {!boost b=log(popularity)}
as the default for all queries?
I'm using Solr through django-haystack, so all the Solr queries are actually
generated by haystack. It'd be much cleaner if I could configure Solr to always
use Boost
I have a project that involves words extracted by OCR, each page has words,
each word has its geometry to blink a highlight to end user.
I've been trying represent this document structure by xml
foo
bar
baz
qux
Using the field 'fulltext_st' ,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Prasanna R wrote:
>
> > I looked into the Solr/Lucene classes and found the required
> information.
> > Am summarizing the same for the benefit of those that might refer to t
> Thanks Ahmet.
>
> Do I need to do anything to enable BoostQParserPlugin in
> Solr, or is it already enabled?
I just confirmed that it is already enabled. You can see affect of it by
appending &debugQuery=on to your search url.
I'm also not sure what hooks you could put in upon the IP floating to the other
machine, to start/stop replication - if it IS an issue anyway.
On Mon 04/01/10 16:28 , Matthew Inger wrote:
> So, when the masters switch back, does that mean, we have to force a
> full delta update, correct?
>
Even when Master 1 is alive again, it shouldn't get the floating IP until
Master 2 actually fails.
So you'd ideally want them replicating to eachother, but since one will only be
updated/Live at a time, it shouldn't cause an issue with cobbling data (?).
Just a suggestion tho, not done it myse
So, when the masters switch back, does that mean, we have to force a full delta
update, correct?
mattin...@yahoo.com
"Once you start down the dark path, forever will it
dominate your destiny. Consume you it will " - Yoda
- Original Message
From: "r...@intelcompute.com"
To: so
Something looks wrong... that type of slowdown is certainly not expected.
You should be able to see both the main query and a sub-query in the
logs... could you post an actual example?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Aleksander Stensby
wrote:
> Hi everyone
Have you looked into a basic floating IP setup?
Have the master also replicate to another hot-spare master.
Any downtime during an outage of the 'live' master would be minimal as the
hot-spare takes up the floating IP.
On Mon 04/01/10 16:13 , Matthew Inger wrote:
> I'm kind of stuck and l
I'm kind of stuck and looking for suggestions for high availability options.
I've figured out without much trouble how to get the master-slave replication
working. This eliminates any single points of failure in the application in
terms of the application's searching capability.
I would setup
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:25 PM, dipti khullar wrote:
> Thanks Shalin.
>
> Following are the relevant details:
>
> There are 2 search servers in a virtualized VMware environment. Each has 2
> instances of Solr running on separates ports in tomcat.
> Server 1: hosts 1 master(application 1), 1 slave
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 22:18:33 -0800
> From: hossman_luc...@fucit.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Reverse sort facet query [SOLR-1672]
>
>
> : Yes, I thought about adding some 'new syntax', but I opted for a separate
> 'facet.sortorder' parameter,
> :
> : mainly beca
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:39 PM, dipti khullar wrote:
> We have tried out various configurations settings to improvise the
> performance of the site which is majorly using Solr but still the response
> time remains about 4-5 reqs/sec. We also did some performance tests on Solr
> 1.4 but still there
The issue was sometimes null result during facet navigation or simple
search, results were back after a refresh, we tried to changed the cache
to . But same behaviour.
*My implementation was :* (maybe wrong ?)
LBHttpSolrServer solrServer = new LBHttpSolrServer(new HttpClient(), new
XMLResponse
Hi
We have tried out various configurations settings to improvise the
performance of the site which is majorly using Solr but still the response
time remains about 4-5 reqs/sec. We also did some performance tests on Solr
1.4 but still there is a very minute improvement in performance. Currently
we
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Patrick Sauts wrote:
>
> I've also tested LBHttpSolrServer (We wanted to have it as a "backup" for
> HAproxy) and it appears not to be thread safe ( what is also curious about
> it, is that there's no way to manage the connections' pool ). If you're
> interresting
Thank you Yonik for your answer.
The platform encoding is "fr_FR.UTF-8", so it's still UTF-8, it should
be I guess "en_US.UTF-8" ?
I've also tested LBHttpSolrServer (We wanted to have it as a "backup"
for HAproxy) and it appears not to be thread safe ( what is also curious
about it, is that
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> I have a Solr (version 1.3) powered search server running in production.
> Search is keyword driven is supported using custom fields and tokenizers.
>
> I am planning to build a rules engine on top search. The rules are database
> driven and
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:36 PM, dipti khullar wrote:
> Hi
>
> Can somebody let me know if its possible to configure RAMDirectory from
> solrconfig.xml. Although its clearly mentioned in
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465 by Mark that he has worked
> upon it, but still I couldn't fin
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> The ASCIIFoldingFilter is a superset of the ISOLatin1Filter -
> ISOLatin1 is deprecated. Here's the Javadoc from ASCIIFoldingFIlter.
> You did not mention which language you want to search.
>
> Unforch, the ASCIIFoldingFilter is not mentione
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:04 AM, A. Steven Anderson wrote:
dynamic fields don't make it worse ... the number of actaul field
names
you sort on makes it worse.
If you sort on 100 fields, the cost is the same regardless of
wether all
100 of those fields exist because of a single
declaration
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Ross wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm experimenting with Solr. I've successfully indexed some PDFs and
> all looks good but now I want to index some PDFs with metadata pulled
> from another source. I see this example in the docs.
>
> curl "
> http://localhost:8983/solr/upd
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Prasanna R wrote:
> I looked into the Solr/Lucene classes and found the required information.
> Am summarizing the same for the benefit of those that might refer to this
> thread in the future.
>
> The change I had to make was very simple - make a call to getPre
Hi everyone! I've posted a similar question earlier, but in a thread related
to facets in general, so I thought I'd repost it here as a separate thread.
I have a faceted search that is very fast when I executed the query on a
single solr server, but is significantly slower when executed in a
distr
Hey, I managed to run it correctly after a few restarts. Don't really know
what happened.
Can't really see what this would have had to do with compound file format
tho? But no, I'm not using compund file format.
Cheers and thanks for your replies,
Aleks
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM, gurudev
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:39 AM, wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Is there an article which explains (on a high level) the algorithm of
> search in Solr?
>
> How does Solr search approach compare to the "inverted index" technique?
>
>
Solr uses Lucene. It is the same inverted index technique at work.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Mohamed Parvez wrote:
> Ditto. There should have been an DIH command to re-sync the Index with the
> DB.
>
But there is such a command; it is called full-import.
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
I have also move the jar into the global core's lib directory. and I still
have this issue.
I am running macosx snowleopard
java version "1.6.0_17"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04-248-10M3025)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.3-b01-101, mixed mode)
I really d
40 matches
Mail list logo
