Well, i've solved this problem executing mvn install:install-file
-DgroupId=org.apache.lucene -DartifactId=lucene-analyzers -Dversion=2.9.1
-Dpackaging=jar -Dfile= for each lucene-* artifact.
I think there must be an easier way to do this, am i wrong?
Hope it helps
Thx
El 3 de noviembre de 200
Thanks guys !!!
2009/11/2 Ryan McKinley
>
> On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Licinio Fernández Maurelo wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> as we are using an snapshot dependecy to solr1.4, today we are getting
>>> problems when maven try to downl
Did you hit the limit for maximum number of characters in a GET request?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Gregg Horan wrote:
> I'm constructing a query using solrj that has a fairly large number of 'OR'
> clauses. I'm just adding it as a big string to setQuery(), in the format
> "
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Ankit Bhatnagar wrote:
> Hi Yonik,
>
> I have a question regarding json.wrf parameter that you introduced in Solr
> query.
>
> I am using YUi Datasource widget and it accepts JSONP format.
>
> Could you tell me if I specify json.wrf in the query will solr return the
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Acadaca wrote:
>
> I am having great difficulty getting SpellCheckComponent to ignore case.
>
> Given a search of Glod, the suggestion is wood
> Given a search of glod, the suggestion is gold
>
> I am using LowerCaseTokenizerFactory for both query and index, so as
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Magnus Eklund wrote:
> Hi
>
> How do I restrict hits to documents containing all words (regardless of
> order) of a query in particular field?
>
> Suppose I have two documents with a field called name in my index:
>
> doc1 => name: Pink
> doc2 => name: Pink Floyd
>
Sorry for the confusion - step four is to be avoided, obviously.
On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:46 PM, Jonathan Hendler wrote:
Getting started with multi core setup following http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
and the book. Generally everything makes sense, but I have one
question.
Here's how e
Getting started with multi core setup following http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
and the book. Generally everything makes sense, but I have one
question.
Here's how easy it was:
place the solr.war into the server
create your core directories in the newly created solr/ directory
set up s
I'm constructing a query using solrj that has a fairly large number of 'OR'
clauses. I'm just adding it as a big string to setQuery(), in the format
"accountId:(this OR that OR yada)".
This works all day long with 300 values. When I push it up to 350-400
values, I get a "Bad Request" SolrServerE
FieldCache uses internally WeakHashMap... nothing wrong, but... no any
Garbage Collection tuning will help in case if allocated RAM is not enough
for replacing Weak** with Strong**, especially for SOLR faceting... 10%-15%
CPU taken by GC were reported...
-Fuad
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:21 PM, bharath venkatesh
wrote:
> we observed many times there is huge mismatch between qtime and
> time measured at the client for the response
Long times to stream back the result to the client could be due to
- client not reading fast enough
- network congestion
- r
This searches author:albert and (default text field): einstein. This
may not be what you expect?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> H, are you sorting? And has your readers been reopened? Is the
> second query of that sort also slow? If the answer to this last question is
I guess this is not a very good idea.
The document itself is a flat data structure. It is hard to see that
is nested datastructure. If allowed , how deep would we wish to make
it.
The simple solution would be to write setters for "b_id" and "b_name" in class A
and the setters can inject values in
In Posix-compliant systems (basically Unix system calls) a file exists
independent of file names, and there can be multiple names for a file.
If a program has a file open, that file can be deleted but it will
still exist until the program closes (or the program exits).
In the snapinstaller cycle,
yup, that can be relaxed. It was just a convention.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Stuart Tettemer wrote:
> Hi folks,
> First of all, thanks for Solr. It is a great piece of work.
>
> I have a question about BinaryRequestWriter in the solrj project. Why does
> it force the path of UpdateReques
Even in simplistic scenario, when it is Garbage Collected, we still
_need_to_be_able_ to allocate enough RAM to FieldCache on demand... linear
dependency on document count...
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Yes, I understand it now; however, how will StringIndexCache size down in
a
> production system facetin
Hi Mark,
Yes, I understand it now; however, how will StringIndexCache size down in a
production system faceting by Country on a homepage? This is SOLR
specific...
Lucene specific: Lucene doesn't read from disk if it can retrieve field
value for a specific document ID from cache. How will it size
I believe this is correct estimate:
> C. [maxdoc] x [4 bytes ~ (int) Lucene Document ID]
>
> same as
> [String1_Document_Count + ... + String10_Document_Count + ...]
> x [4 bytes per DocumentID]
So, for 100 millions docs we need 400Mb for each(!) non-tokenized field.
Although FieldCacheImpl
>
> This isn't a search, this is a search and destroy. Basically I need the
> file names of all the documents that I've indexed in Solr so that I can
> delete them.
>
Okay. I am sure you are aware of the "fl" parameter which restricts the
number of fields returned back with a response. If you need
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> I was doing it that way, but what I'm doing with the documents is do
>> some manipulation and put the new classes into a different list.
>> Because I basically have two times the number of documents in lists,
>> I'm running out of memory.
static final class StringIndexCache extends Cache {
StringIndexCache(FieldCache wrapper) {
super(wrapper);
}
@Override
protected Object createValue(IndexReader reader, Entry entryKey)
throws IOException {
String field = StringHelper.intern(entryKey.field);
>
> I was doing it that way, but what I'm doing with the documents is do
> some manipulation and put the new classes into a different list.
> Because I basically have two times the number of documents in lists,
> I'm running out of memory. So I figured if I do it 1000 documents at
> a time, the So
About large XML files and http overhead: you can tell solr to load the
file directly from a file system. This will stream thousands of
documents in one XML file without loading everything in memory at
once.
This is a new book on Solr. It will help you through this early learning phase.
http://www
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> final static int MAX_ROWS = 100;
>> int start = 0;
>> query.setRows(MAX_ROWS);
>> while (true)
>> {
>> QueryResponse resp = solrChunkServer.query(query);
>> SolrDocumentList docs = resp.getResults();
>> if (docs.size() == 0)
>> br
To be correct, I analyzed FieldCache awhile ago and I believed it never
"sizes down"...
/**
* Expert: The default cache implementation, storing all values in memory.
* A WeakHashMap is used for storage.
*
* Created: May 19, 2004 4:40:36 PM
*
* @since lucene 1.4
*/
Will it size down? Onl
>
> final static int MAX_ROWS = 100;
> int start = 0;
> query.setRows(MAX_ROWS);
> while (true)
> {
> QueryResponse resp = solrChunkServer.query(query);
> SolrDocumentList docs = resp.getResults();
> if (docs.size() == 0)
> break;
>
> start += MAX_ROWS;
> query.setStart(start);
>
Ok, my "naive" thinking about FieldCache: for each Term we can quickly
retrieve DocSet. What are memory requirements? Theoretically,
[maxdoc]x[4-bytes DocumentID], plus some (small) array to store terms
pointing to (large) arrays of DocumentIDs.
Mike suggested http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
Mark,
I don't understand this:
> so with a ton of docs and a few uniques, you get a temp boost in the RAM
> reqs until it sizes it down.
Sizes down??? Why is it called Cache indeed? And how SOLR uses it if it is
not cache?
And this:
> A pointer for each doc.
Why can't we use (int) DocumentID?
I just did some tests in a completely new index (Slave), sort by
low-distributed non-tokenized Field (such as Country) takes milliseconds,
but sort (ascending) on tokenized field with heavy distribution took 30
seconds (initially). Second sort (descending) took milliseconds. Generic
query *.*; Fiel
If I want to do a query and only return X number of rows at a time,
but I want to keep querying until I get all the row, how do I do that?
Can I just keep advancing query.setStart(...) and then checking if
server.query(query) returns any rows? Or is there a better way?
Here's what I'm thinking
Fuad Efendi wrote:
> Simple field (10 different values: Canada, USA, UK, ...), 64-bit JVM... no
> difference between maxdoc and maxdoc + 1 for such estimate... difference is
> between 0.4Gb and 1.2Gb...
>
>
I'm not sure I understand - but I didn't mean to imply the +1 on maxdoc
meant anything. T
Hoping someone might help with getting /update/extract RequestHandler to
work under Tomcat.
Error 500 happens when trying to access
http://localhost:8080/apache-solr-1.4-dev/update/extract/ (see below)
Note /update/extract DOES work correctly under the Jetty provided
example.
I think I must ha
Simple field (10 different values: Canada, USA, UK, ...), 64-bit JVM... no
difference between maxdoc and maxdoc + 1 for such estimate... difference is
between 0.4Gb and 1.2Gb...
So, let's vote ;)
A. [maxdoc] x [8 bytes ~ pointer to String object]
B. [maxdoc] x [8 bytes ~ pointer to Document ob
2009/11/1 Ryan McKinley
> I'm sure it is possible to configure JDK logging (java.util.loging)
> programatically... but I have never had much luck with it.
>
> It is very easy to configure log4j programatically, and this works great
> with solr.
>
Don't suppose I could trouble you for an example?
Sorry - it was a bug in the backport from trunk to 2.9.1 - didn't
realize that code didn't get hit because we didn't pass a null field -
else the tests would have caught it. Fix has been committed but I don't
know whether it will make 2.9.1 or 1.4 because both have gotten the
votes and time needed
Hi folks,
First of all, thanks for Solr. It is a great piece of work.
I have a question about BinaryRequestWriter in the solrj project. Why does
it force the path of UpdateRequests to have be "/update/javabin" (see
BinaryRequestWriter.getPath(String) starting on line 109)?
I am extending Binary
It also briefly requires more memory than just that - it allocates an
array the size of maxdoc+1 to hold the unique terms - and then sizes down.
Possibly we can use the getUnuiqeTermCount method in the flexible
indexing branch to get rid of that - which is why I was thinking it
might be a good ide
So assuming you set up a few sample sort queries to run in the firstSearcher
config, and had very low query volume during that ten minutes so that there
were no evictions before a new Searcher was loaded, would those queries run
by the firstSearcher be passed along to the cache for the next Searche
Thank you very much Mike,
I found it:
org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets
...
// TODO: future logic could use filters instead of the fieldcache if
// the number of terms in the field is small enough.
counts = getFieldCacheCounts(searcher, base, field, offset,limit,
mincou
This is what I meant to mention - Uri's GWT browser, not the Velocity toolkit.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> There is also a GWT contribution in JIRA that is pretty handy and will
> likely be added in 1.5. See http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163
>
> -Grant
The problem is in db-dataconfig.xml. You should start with the example
DataImportHandler configuration fles.
The structure is wrong. First there is a datasource, then there are
'entities' which fetch a document's fields from the datasource.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, manishkbawne wrote:
>
Hmm...I think you have to setup warming queries yourself and that
autowarm just copies entries from the old cache to the new cache,
rather than issuing queries - the value is how many entries it will
copy. Though that's still going to take CPU and time.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.c
Hello everybody
i am able to use spell checker but i have some questions if someone can
answer this
if i search free text word waranty then i get back suggestion warranty which
is fine.
but if do a search on field for example
description:waranty the output collation element is description:warranty
Hello everybody
i am able to use spell checker but i have some questions if someone can
answer this
if i search free text word waranty then i get back suggestion warranty which
is fine.
but if do a search on field for example
description:waranty the output collation element is description:warranty
Umm - crap. This looks looks like a bug in a fix that just went in. My
fault on the review. I'll fix it tonight when I get home -
unfortunetly, both lucene and sold are about to be released...
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Nov 2, 2009, at 5:17 PM, Jake Brownell wrote:
OK I think someone who knows how Solr uses the fieldCache for this
type of field will have to pipe up.
For Lucene directly, simple strings would consume an pointer (4 or 8
bytes depending on whether your JRE is 64bit) per doc, and the string
index would consume an int (4 bytes) per doc. (Each als
Bertie,
Not sure what you are trying to do, we need a clearer description of
what "select *" returns and what you want to end up in the index. But
to answer your question The transformations happen after DIH has
performed the SQL statement. In fact the rows output from the SQL
command are assigne
H, are you sorting? And has your readers been reopened? Is the
second query of that sort also slow? If the answer to this last question is
"no",
have you tried some autowarming queries?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:34 PM, mike anderson wrote:
> I took a look through my Solr logs this
So I need someone with better knowledge to chime in here with an opinion
on whether autowarming would help since the whole faceting thing is
something
I'm not very comfortable with...
Erick
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:21 PM, bharath venkatesh <
bharathv6.proj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Israel: yes I
It looks like the snapinstaller script does an atomic remove and replace of
the entire solr_home/data_dir/index folder with the contents of the new
snapshot before issuing a commit command. I am trying to understand the
implication of the same.
What happens to queries that come during the time
Hi,
I've tried installing the latest (3rd) RC for Solr 1.4 and Lucene 2.9.1. One of
our integration tests, which runs against and embedded server appears to be
failing on highlighting. I've included the stack trace and the configuration
from solrconf. I'd appreciate any insights. Please let me
You can see what revision the patch was written for at the top of the patch,
it will look like this:
Index: org/apache/solr/handler/MoreLikeThisHandler.java
===
--- org/apache/solr/handler/MoreLikeThisHandler.java (revision 772437)
++
This may seem like a strange question, but here it goes anyway.
Im considering the possibility of low-level constructing indices for about
20.000 indexed fields (type sInt) if at all possible . (With indices in this
context I mean the inverted indices from term to Documentid just to be 100%
comp
I took a look through my Solr logs this weekend and noticed that the longest
queries were on particular fields, like "author:albert einstein". Is this a
result consistent with other setups out there? If not, Is there a trick to
make these go faster? I've read up on filter queries and use those when
I think you want Koji Sekiguchi's Char Filters:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters?highlight=char+filters#Char_Filters
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Calderon [mailto:calderon@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:25 AM
> To: solr-user@lucen
Hi,
I have three fields, business_name, category_name, sub_category_name in my
solrconfig file.
my query = "pet clinic"
example sub_category_names: Veterinarians, Kennels, Veterinary Clinics
Hospitals, Pet Grooming, Pet Stores, Clinics
my ideal requirement is dismax searching on
a. dismax
I am not using Lucene API directly; I am using SOLR which uses Lucene
FieldCache for faceting on non-tokenized fields...
I think this cache will be lazily loaded, until user executes sorted (by
this field) SOLR query for all documents *:* - in this case it will be fully
populated...
> Subject: Re
Hi,
First I like to pardon my novice question on patching solr (1.4). What I
like to know is, given a patch, like the one for collapse field, how would
one go about knowing what solr source that patch is meant for since this is
a source level patch? Wouldn't the exact versions of a set of java
Hi,
First I like to pardon my novice question on patching solr (1.4). What I
like to know is, given a patch, like the one for collapse field, how would
one go about knowing what solr source that patch is meant for since this is
a source level patch? Wouldn't the exact versions of a set of java
Hi Micheal,
Field collapsing is basicly done in two steps. The first step is to
get the uncollapsed sorted (whether it is score or a field value)
documents and the second step is to apply the collapse algorithm on
the uncollapsed documents. So yes, when specifying
collapse.type=adjacent the docume
Hallo All. I've been trying to prepare a project using localsolr for the
impending (I hope) arrival of solr 1.4 and Lucene 2.9.1.. Here are some
notes in case anyone else is suffering similarly. Obviously everything here
may change by next week.
First problem has been the lack of any stable maven
Which FieldCache API are you using? getStrings? or getStringIndex
(which is used, under the hood, if you sort by this field).
Mike
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> Any thoughts regarding the subject? I hope FieldCache doesn't use more than
> 6 bytes per document-field insta
Any thoughts regarding the subject? I hope FieldCache doesn't use more than
6 bytes per document-field instance... I am too lazy to research Lucene
source code, I hope someone can provide exact answer... Thanks
> Subject: Lucene FieldCache memory requirements
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Can anyone confirm L
@Israel: yes I got that point which yonik mentioned .. but is qtime the
total time taken by solr server for that request or is it part of time
taken by the solr for that request ( is there any thing that a solr server
does for that particulcar request which is not included in that qtime
bracket )
If you are going to pull a new index every 10 minutes, try turning off
cache autowarming.
Your caches are never more than 10 minutes old, so spending a minute
warming each new cache is a waste of CPU. Autowarm submits queries to
the new Searcher before putting it in service. This will creat
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:52 AM, bharath venkatesh <
bharathv6.proj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response
> @yonik
>
> >How much of a latency compared to normal, and what version of Solr are
> you using?
>
> latency is usually around 2-4 secs (some times it goes more than that
> ) w
Hi Noble,
I tried to understand your suggestions and played different variations
according to your reply. But none of them work. Can you explain it in more
details?
Thanks a lot!
BTW, do you mean your solution as follows?
But
1) T
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:57 PM, M. Tinnemeyer wrote:
> Dear listusers,
>
> Is there a way to store an instance of class A (including the fields from
> "myB") via solr using annotations ?
> The index should look like : id; name; b_id; b_name
>
> --
> Class A {
>
> @Field
> private String
is it possible to tokenize a field on whitespace after some filters
have been applied:
ex: "A + W Root Beer"
the field uses a keyword tokenizer to keep the string together, then
it will get converted to "aw root beer" by a custom filter ive made, i
now want to split that up into 3 tokens (aw, roo
Also, how about a sample of a fast and slow query? And is a slow
query only slow the first time it's executed or every time?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:52 AM, bharath venkatesh <
bharathv6.proj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response
> @yonik
>
> >How much of a latency comp
Are there any pitfalls to storing an arbitrary text file in the same
directory as the solr index?
We're slinging different versions of the index around while we're
testing and it's hard to keep them straight.
I'd like to put a readme.txt file in the directory that contains some
history about
Hey Eric,
That correct however it didn't work with YUI widget.
I changed my approach to use jQuery for now.
-Ankit
-Original Message-
From: Eric Pugh [mailto:ep...@opensourceconnections.com]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 10:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr
> e.g (doesn't work)
> curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?extractOnly=true
> --data-binary @http://myweb.com/mylocalfile.htm -H "Content-type:text/html"
> You might try remote streaming with Solr (see
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml).
Yes, curl example
curl
'http://local
It does, have you looked at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolJSON?highlight=%28json%29#Using_Solr.27s_JSON_output_for_AJAX.
Also, in my book on Solr, there is an example, but using the jquery
autocomplete, which I think was answered earlier on the thread! Hope that
helps.
ANKITBHATNAGAR wrote:
Thanks for the quick response
@yonik
>How much of a latency compared to normal, and what version of Solr are
you using?
latency is usually around 2-4 secs (some times it goes more than that
) which happens to only 15-20% of the request other 80-85% of
request are very fast it is in milli s
Hi,
I would like to confirm if 'adjacent' in collapse.type means the documents
(with the same collapse field value) are considered adjacent *after* the
'sort' param from the query has been applied, or *before*? I would think it
would be *after* since collapse feature primarily is meant for prese
Hey Amit,
My index(ie Solr) was on different domain, so I can't use XHR(as XHR doesnot
work with cross domain proxyless data fetch).
I tried using YUI's DS_ScriptNode but didn't work.
I completed my task by using jQuery and it worked well with solr.
-Ankit
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Eugene,
> - ability to iterate over all documents, returned in search, as Lucene does
> provide within a HitCollector instance. We would need to extract and
> aggregate various fields, stored in index, to group results and aggregate
> them
> in some way.
>
> Also I did not find any way
On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:29 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Licinio Fernández Maurelo wrote:
Hi folks,
as we are using an snapshot dependecy to solr1.4, today we are
getting
problems when maven try to download lucene 2.9.1 (there isn't a any
2.9.1
there).
Which rep
I think it might be to do with the library itself
I downloaded semanticvectors-1.22 and compiled from source. Then created a demo
corpus using
java org.apache.lucene.demo.IndexFiles against the lucene src directory
I then ran a java pitt.search.semanticvectors.BuildIndex against the index and
got
On Nov 2, 2009, at 5:41 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
QTime is the time spent in generating the in-memory representation for
the response before the response writer starts streaming it back in
whatever format was requested. The stored fields of returned
documents are also loaded at this point (to en
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:13 AM, bharath venkatesh
> wrote:
> >We are using solr for many of ur products it is doing quite well
> > . But since no of hits are becoming high we are experiencing latency
> > in certain requests ,about 15% of
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:13 AM, bharath venkatesh
wrote:
> We are using solr for many of ur products it is doing quite well
> . But since no of hits are becoming high we are experiencing latency
> in certain requests ,about 15% of our requests are suffering a latency
How much of a latency co
Hi,
I've recently added the TermVectorComponent as a separate handler, following
the example in the supplied config file, i.e.:
true
tvComponent
It works, but with one quirk. When you use tf.all=true, you
On Nov 2, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Licinio Fernández Maurelo wrote:
Hi folks,
as we are using an snapshot dependecy to solr1.4, today we are getting
problems when maven try to download lucene 2.9.1 (there isn't a any
2.9.1
there).
Which repository can i use to download it?
They won't be there
Hi,
We are using solr for many of ur products it is doing quite well
. But since no of hits are becoming high we are experiencing latency
in certain requests ,about 15% of our requests are suffering a latency
. We are trying to identify the problem . It may be due to network
issue or sol
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:57 PM, darniz wrote:
>
> Question. Should i build the dictionlary only once and after that as new
> words are indexed the dictionary will be updated. Or i to do that manually
> over certain interval.
>
>
No. The dictionary is built only when spellcheck.build=true is spec
Hi,
I've got a few machines who post documents concurrently to a solr
instance. They do not issue the commit themselves, instead, I've got
autocommit set up at solr server side:
5
6
This usually works fine, but sometime the server goes in a deadlock
state . Here's
I'm able to reproduce this issue consistently using JDK 1.6.0_16
After an optimize is called, only one thread keeps adding documents and the
rest wait on StreamingUpdateSolrServer line 196.
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Dadasheva, Olga wrote:
> I am using java 1.6.0_05
>
> To illustrate what
I'm using a code generator for my entities, and I cannot modify the generation.
I need to work out another option :(
shouldn't code generators help development and not make it more complex
and difficult? oO
(sry off topic)
chantal
Hi Solr Gurus,
We have solr in 1 master, 2 slave configuration. Snapshot is created post
commit, post optimization. We have autocommit after 50 documents or 5 minutes.
Snapshot puller runs as a cron every 10 minutes. What we have observed is that
whenever snapshot is installed on the slave, we
Hi folks,
as we are using an snapshot dependecy to solr1.4, today we are getting
problems when maven try to download lucene 2.9.1 (there isn't a any 2.9.1
there).
Which repository can i use to download it?
Thx
--
Lici
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> A thought I had on this from a DIH design perspective. Would it be better to
> have the SQL queries stored in an element rather than an attribute so that
> you can wrap it in a CDATA block without having to mess up the look of query
> with <,
93 matches
Mail list logo
