On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Anyone know why you would see a transfer speed of just 10-20MB over a
> gigbit network connection?
>
> Even with standard drives, I would expect to at least see around 40MB.
> Has anyone seen over 10-20 using replication?
>
> Any ideas on what
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Simon Wistow wrote:
> We've been trying to build an indexing pipeline using SolrJ but we've
> run into a couple of issues - namely that IndexReaders don't seem to get
> reopened after a commit().
>
> After an index or delete the change doesn't show up until I rest
I am using solr search to search through xml files. As I am working on
millions of data, the result output is slower. Can anyone please suggest me
some way, by which I can increase the search result output?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/solr-search-tp26125183p26125183.h
Sorry, answering my own question - I see it has been marked for 1.5 :-)
-Original Message-
From: Bernadette Houghton [mailto:bernadette.hough...@deakin.edu.au]
Sent: Friday, 30 October 2009 2:54 PM
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: uppercase and wildcards/truncation
Looks like s
Looks like solr 1.3 at least is still not lowercasing wildcarded/truncated
queries.
I see from http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-219 that this has been an
issue for a while.
Anyone know if this has yet been solved?
TIA
Bernadette Houghton, Library Business Applications Developer
Deaki
Thank you very much...I shall try out the tokenizerFactory attribute on
SynonymFilterFactory
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I had to be brief as my facets are in the order of 100K over 800K
> documents
> : and also if I give the complete schema.xml I was afraid nob
how do you know that all the rows with the same group id has already come?
transformer can store the row and return null till you collect all the
rows and then you may return one consolidated row. But the problem is
it does not know when the row ends.
you can override the SqlEntityProcessor and ju
Hi,
I'm a new solr user. I would like to know if there are any easy to setup web
UIs for solr. It can be as simple as a search box, term highlighting and
basic faceting. Basically I'm using solr to store all our automation testing
logs and would like to have a simple searchable UI. I don't wanna
>
> One thing I thought about is if I can define my own
> DocumentObjectBinder, so I can concatenate my entity names with the
> IDs in the XML creation.
>
> Anyone knows if something like this can be done without modifying
> Solrj sources? Is there any injection or plugin mecanism for this?
>
More
Read this example fully -
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Full_Import_Example
"nested entities" is an answer to your question. The example has a sample.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Joel Nylund wrote:
> Hi, Its been hurting my brain all day to try to build 1 quer
>
> In the database this is modeled a a 1-N where category table has the
> mapping of feed to category
> I need to be able to query , give me all the feeds in any given category.
> How can I best model this in solr?
> Seems like multiValued field might help, but how would I populate it, and
> would
Hi,
I have one index so far which contains feeds. I have been able to de-
normalize several tables and map this data onto the feed entity. There
is one tricky problem that I need help on.
Feeds have 1 - many categories.
So Lets say we have Category1, Category2 and Category3
Feed 1 - is in
Sorry, forgot that part.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
>
> Actually Avlesh pointed me at that, earlier in the thread. But thanks :-)
>
>
> Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Clegg
>> wrote:
>>> If I give a query that matches a single docume
G'day Avlesh, converting the "all" field to type "edgytext" doesn't work as
expected as the various "text" analysers etc don't get to work on that field,
so I get less results than expected. And adding the edgy filter into the text
field also yields less results. I can work around the issue by s
Hi, Its been hurting my brain all day to try to build 1 query for my
index (joins upon joins upon joins). Is there a way I can do multiple
queries to populate the same index? I have one main table that I can
join everything back via ID, it should be theoretically possible
If this can be
1.4 has a good chance of being released next week. There was a hope that it
might make it this week, but another bug in Lucene 2.9.1 was found, pushing
things back just a little bit longer.
-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, beaviebugeater wrote:
>
> Do you h
We've been trying to build an indexing pipeline using SolrJ but we've
run into a couple of issues - namely that IndexReaders don't seem to get
reopened after a commit().
After an index or delete the change doesn't show up until I restart
solr.
I've tried commit() and commit(true, true) just to
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:10 AM, peelman wrote:
Indeed I have used this already, buy unless I am missing something
this will
always return scores based on the entire index. I see now way from
the
documentation to have it recalculate TF-IDF scores using only a
subset of
documents. Am I mi
Hi Israel,
Thanks for your suggestion,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Christian López Espínola <
> penyask...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, my name is Christian and I'm a newbie introducing to solr (and solrj).
>>
>> I'm working on a website w
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Christian López Espínola <
penyask...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, my name is Christian and I'm a newbie introducing to solr (and solrj).
>
> I'm working on a website where I want to index multiple entities, like
> Book or Magazine.
> The issue I'm facing is both of the
Actually Avlesh pointed me at that, earlier in the thread. But thanks :-)
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Clegg
> wrote:
>> If I give a query that matches a single document, and facet on a
>> particular
>> field, I get a list of all the terms in that field whi
Hello all,
Is it possible to have my own implemented transformer that generates some
output data from data of 2 different rows?
My intention is to generate pre-processed HTML from a set of rows.
Eg.
SQL RESULT:
GROUP | ITEM_ID | DESCRIPTION
1 | 8 | desc1
1 | 23 | desc2
1 |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
> If I give a query that matches a single document, and facet on a particular
> field, I get a list of all the terms in that field which appear in that
> document.
>
> (I also get some with a count of zero, I don't really understand where they
>
Are you sure? I've *never* explicitly deleted a document, I only ever
rebuild the entire index with the data import handler's "full import with
cleaning" operation.
Lance Norskog-2 wrote:
>
> 0-value facets are left behind by docs which you have deleted. If you
> optimize, there should be no 0
0-value facets are left behind by docs which you have deleted. If you
optimize, there should be no 0-value facets.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
>
>
> Isn't the TermVectorComponent more for one document at a time, and the
> TermsComponent for the whole index?
>
> Actually
Hi, my name is Christian and I'm a newbie introducing to solr (and solrj).
I'm working on a website where I want to index multiple entities, like
Book or Magazine.
The issue I'm facing is both of them have an attribute ID, which I
want to use as the uniqueKey on my schema, so I cannot identify
uni
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Joel Nylund wrote:
> Hi, I have been reading the solr book and wiki, but I cant find any similar
> examples to what Im looking for.
>
> I have a database field called category, this field needs some text
> manipulation before it goes in the index
>
> here is the j
Here is where our custom class is referenced in the schema:
As you can see, we built our own field type to be used at index time to
essentially act as a sort of KeywordTokenizer, but removing stopwords. We
share a schema.xml for both master and slave servers for conv
Do you have any (educated) guess on when 1.4 will be officially released?
Weeks? Months? Years?
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> Perhaps something like this that's actually running Solr w/ multi-selecti?
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Ta
Thanks, that demonstrates it really nicely.
Now if only dismax did wildcards too... :-)
Cheers,
Andrew.
ANithian wrote:
>
> The best way to get started with answering this is to pass the
> &debugQuery=true and to scroll down the results page. Here, you will see a
> breakdown of how the quer
The best way to get started with answering this is to pass the
&debugQuery=true and to scroll down the results page. Here, you will see a
breakdown of how the query you entered in the q field is being parsed and
sent to lucene via the pf,qf, and bf. You can also see how the weights
affect the diffe
I'll dive in. On the surface this looks like exactly what I described.
Thanks for the quick reply!!
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> Perhaps something like this that's actually running Solr w/ multi-selecti?
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameter
Perhaps something like this that's actually running Solr w/ multi-selecti?
http://search.lucidimagination.com/
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters
You just need a recent version of Solr 1.4
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009
I have implemented faceting with Solr for an ecommerce project.
However, I'd like to change the default behavior somewhat. Visualize with
me the left nav that contains:
Attribute A
value1 (count)
value2 (count)
value3 (count)
Attribute B
value4 (count)
value5 (count)
The user interface has a
Another option is the RegexTransformer in DIH:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler?highlight=%28regex%29#RegexTransformer
Chantal
William Pierce schrieb:
I'd recommend two ways: The way I do it in my app is that I have written a
MySql function to transform the column as part of the
I'd recommend two ways: The way I do it in my app is that I have written a
MySql function to transform the column as part of the select statement. In
this approach, your select query would like so:
select col1, col2, col3, spPrettyPrintCategory(category) as X, col4,
col5, from table
Hi, I have been reading the solr book and wiki, but I cant find any
similar examples to what Im looking for.
I have a database field called category, this field needs some text
manipulation before it goes in the index
here is the java code for what im trying to do:
// categories look like
Indeed I have used this already, buy unless I am missing something this will
always return scores based on the entire index. I see now way from the
documentation to have it recalculate TF-IDF scores using only a subset of
documents. Am I missing something?
Are you saying I can do a filter query
Dear listusers,
Is there a way to store an instance of class A (including the fields
from "myB") via solr using annotations ?
The index should look like : id; name; b_id; b_name
--
Class A {
@Field
private String id;
@Field
private String name;
@Field
private B myB;
}
--
Cla
Hi all.
Just wanted to inform you that a new solr-driven website is up and
running, and to say thanks to you guys for helping out.
A little info:
Bedriftsøket.no (http://www.bedriftsoket.no/) is a Norwegian company
catalogue using solr and SolrNet for all search/faceting
functionality. Th
Hey everyone thanks for the help, it seems to be working this am after
a restart & reindex (maybe I was just too sleepy last night), and
using field type of text_ws.
Im curios about the pro's and cons of Michel's approach below, this
seems like another good way to do it, is there any differ
Have a look at the TermVectorComponent: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermVectorComponent
. That might help.
On Oct 28, 2009, at 10:30 PM, peelman wrote:
I have an index of about 3 million documents, and specific list of
document
ids that belong in that 3 million (somewhere around 20-50 doc
I would guess that your code is being used. I'm not sure what you
mean by it "was only referenced in the schema". That implies usage to
me. Is it a new field type? What is your plugin doing?
Have you tried setting breakpoints at method entry points in your
plugin and starting up Solr w/
Hi Joel,
If you intend querying for the TITLE which starts with specifics letters, I
have another solution which seems to be easier, since you don't need a
specific field for the first letter.
1. Create a new type in your schema.xml using the following analyzer
Morning,
Can someone clarify how dismax queries work under the hood? I couldn't work
this particular point out from the documentation...
I get that they pretty much issue the user's query against all of the fields
in the schema -- or rather, all of the fields you've specified in the qf
parameter
45 matches
Mail list logo
