1.4 has a good chance of being released next week. There was a hope that it
might make it this week, but another bug in Lucene 2.9.1 was found, pushing
things back just a little bit longer.

-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com


On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, beaviebugeater <mbr...@jdnholdings.com>wrote:

>
> Do you have any (educated) guess on when 1.4 will be officially released?
> Weeks? Months? Years?
>
>
>
>
> Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps something like this that's actually running Solr w/
> multi-selecti?
> > http://search.lucidimagination.com/
> >
> >
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters
> >
> > You just need a recent version of Solr 1.4
> >
> > -Yonik
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, beaviebugeater <mbr...@jdnholdings.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have implemented faceting with Solr for an ecommerce project.
> >>
> >> However, I'd like to change the default behavior somewhat.  Visualize
> >> with
> >> me the left nav that contains:
> >>
> >> Attribute A
> >> value1 (count)
> >> value2 (count)
> >> value3 (count)
> >>
> >> Attribute B
> >> value4 (count)
> >> value5 (count)
> >>
> >> The user interface has a checkbox for each attribute value.  As a
> >> checkbox
> >> is checked, the list of products is refined to include those with the
> >> selected attribute(s).
> >>
> >> The default behavior is to AND all selected attributes.
> >>
> >> What I would like is if I check value1, none of the counts for Attribute
> >> A
> >> change, just the product result set.  If I then check value3 the effect
> >> is
> >> that I'm saying products with values for Attribute A of value1 OR value3
> >> (not AND).  Counts for Attribute B do change as usual.
> >>
> >> If I then check value4, the effect is to return products with values for
> >> Attribute A of (value1 OR value3) AND values for Attribute B of value5.
> >>
> >> You can see this sort of thing in action here:
> >>
> >>
> http://www.beanbags.com/bean-bag-chairs/large/1618+1620+4225.cfm#N=1618+1620+4225+4229+4231&Ns=Preferred&view=36&display=grid_view
> >>
> >> Is this doable with Solr out of the box or do I need to build some logic
> >> around Solr's faceting functionality?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >>
> http://www.nabble.com/Facets---ORing-attribute-values-tp26117763p26117763.html
> >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Facets---ORing-attribute-values-tp26117763p26118562.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to