1.4 has a good chance of being released next week. There was a hope that it might make it this week, but another bug in Lucene 2.9.1 was found, pushing things back just a little bit longer.
-Jay http://www.lucidimagination.com On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, beaviebugeater <mbr...@jdnholdings.com>wrote: > > Do you have any (educated) guess on when 1.4 will be officially released? > Weeks? Months? Years? > > > > > Yonik Seeley-2 wrote: > > > > Perhaps something like this that's actually running Solr w/ > multi-selecti? > > http://search.lucidimagination.com/ > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters > > > > You just need a recent version of Solr 1.4 > > > > -Yonik > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, beaviebugeater <mbr...@jdnholdings.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I have implemented faceting with Solr for an ecommerce project. > >> > >> However, I'd like to change the default behavior somewhat. Visualize > >> with > >> me the left nav that contains: > >> > >> Attribute A > >> value1 (count) > >> value2 (count) > >> value3 (count) > >> > >> Attribute B > >> value4 (count) > >> value5 (count) > >> > >> The user interface has a checkbox for each attribute value. As a > >> checkbox > >> is checked, the list of products is refined to include those with the > >> selected attribute(s). > >> > >> The default behavior is to AND all selected attributes. > >> > >> What I would like is if I check value1, none of the counts for Attribute > >> A > >> change, just the product result set. If I then check value3 the effect > >> is > >> that I'm saying products with values for Attribute A of value1 OR value3 > >> (not AND). Counts for Attribute B do change as usual. > >> > >> If I then check value4, the effect is to return products with values for > >> Attribute A of (value1 OR value3) AND values for Attribute B of value5. > >> > >> You can see this sort of thing in action here: > >> > >> > http://www.beanbags.com/bean-bag-chairs/large/1618+1620+4225.cfm#N=1618+1620+4225+4229+4231&Ns=Preferred&view=36&display=grid_view > >> > >> Is this doable with Solr out of the box or do I need to build some logic > >> around Solr's faceting functionality? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> Matt > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Facets---ORing-attribute-values-tp26117763p26117763.html > >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Facets---ORing-attribute-values-tp26117763p26118562.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >