You are right about the parsing of query terms without a double quote
(solrQueryParser's defaultOperator has to be "AND" in your case). For the
problem at hand, two things -
1. Do you have any reason for not doing a PhraseQuery (query terms
enclosed in double quotes) on your "edgytext" field
Thanks for this suggestion (thanks Gerald also: no, we're not using
BlackLight-type prefixes).
I've set up an edgytext fieldType in schema.xml thus -
And defined a field name thus -
The results are mixed -
* searches such as "surname, f" and "surname, fre" (wit
Yonik, Thanks.
One question inline below:
On Oct 26, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Can I do this through a facet query or another param ?
Faceting should also work... the terms component is very much like the
faceting component except that it always works over the complete index
(in
2009/10/26 Licinio Fernández Maurelo :
> Hi there,
>
> i must enhance solr config deploys.
>
> I have a configuration file per environment and per role (Master-Slave) so i
> want to separate DataSource definitions from the solrconfig.xml . Where can
> i put them?
are you referring to DIH?
>
> Same
Hi David, (and Yonik)
Thanks for the quick responses. The book is quite comprehensive. Nice
work.
Looks like I misinterpreted my own results - totally a user error. (I
guess that's a good way to introduce yourself to a mailing list. )
I had used the example on page 156. My error: documen
I've been testing Solr 1.4.0 (RC).
After sometime, solr started to pause
for a long time (a minutes or two) after
printing:
INFO: jetty-6.1.3
Sometime it starts immediately, but more often
than not, it pasues. Is there any known cause
of this kind of long pause?
-kuro
found another exception, i cant find specific steps to reproduce
besides starting with an unfiltered result and then given an int field
with values (1,2,3) filtering by 3 triggers it sometimes, this is in
an index with very frequent updates and deletes
--joe
java.lang.NullPointerException
Jon, there actually is an example of this in my book. Go to page 156. I
looked and found "term-suggest" in the index.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
Jonathan Hendler-3 wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> We're happily migrating our MySQL fulltex
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Paul Rosen wrote:
> Is there any difference to the relevancy score for a document that has been
> added directly to an index vs. the same document that got into the index
> because of a merge?
Nope. Anything else would be a bug.
There are some subtleties such as
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Teruhiko Kurosaka wrote:
> Are multiple CPUs utilized at indexing time as well, or just by searcher?
Yes, multiple CPUs are utilized for indexing.
If you're using SolrJ, and easy way to exploit this parallelism is to use
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apac
Is there any difference to the relevancy score for a document that has
been added directly to an index vs. the same document that got into the
index because of a merge?
In other words, I'd like to build my index in pieces (since people in
different cities will be working on parts of it), but I
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Jonathan Hendler
wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> We're happily migrating our MySQL fulltext search to SOLR/faceted search.
>
> We're doing a term suggest on a large text field and doing facet.sort=count.
> The numbers returned represent total times the term shows up -
Hello all,
I've just blogged about how you can create custom transformers in java.
This post is written in portuguese (brazilian), but I'm sure it can help
some ppl (not only portuguese and brazilian ones).
The link is:
http://lucastex.com.br/2009/10/26/criando-um-transformer-customizado-para-o-s
Greetings all,
We're happily migrating our MySQL fulltext search to SOLR/faceted
search.
We're doing a term suggest on a large text field and doing
facet.sort=count. The numbers returned represent total times the term
shows up - I'd like to have the numbers represent the total documents
The Netbeans profiler is also very good - available both in Netbeans and
VisualVM. And of course Eclipse has a profiler - but its a little harder
to get that off the ground.
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I usually use YourKit, but have also had success w/ JProfiler.
>
>
> On Oct 26, 2009, at 3:31 PM, J
I usually use YourKit, but have also had success w/ JProfiler.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Joe Calderon wrote:
as a curiosity ide like to use a profiler to see where within solr
queries spend most of their time, im curious what tools if any others
use for this type of task..
im using jetty a
Thank you, Yonik.
Are multiple CPUs utilized at indexing time as well, or just by searcher?
-kuro
> -Original Message-
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:27 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject
I am getting exactly the same problem here.
In my schema.xml I set up a multivalued field 'barfield' of type 'text'.
When I try to perform a search such as this:
http://localhost/solr/coreFoo/select?q=Foo Bar&hl=on&hl.fl=barfield
I get the StringIndexOutOfBoundsException problem.
As I did not
as a curiosity ide like to use a profiler to see where within solr
queries spend most of their time, im curious what tools if any others
use for this type of task..
im using jetty as my servlet container so ideally ide like a profiler
thats compatible with it
--joe
2009/10/26 Teruhiko Kurosaka :
> Is Solr 1.4 (Release Candidate) suppose to take advantage
> of muti-CPU (core) system? I.e. if more than one update or
> search requests come in about the same time, they can be
> automatically assigned to differnt CPUs if available
> (and the OS does its job right)
Is Solr 1.4 (Release Candidate) suppose to take advantage
of muti-CPU (core) system? I.e. if more than one update or
search requests come in about the same time, they can be
automatically assigned to differnt CPUs if available
(and the OS does its job right)?
BTW, the term "multicore" in Solr dis
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I need some help about the mergeindex command. I have 2 cores A and B
> : that I want to merge into a new index RES. A has 100 docs and B 10
> : docs. All of B's docs are from A, except that one attribute is
> : changed. The goal is to
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
> Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>>
>> If you could, it would be great if you could test commenting out the
>> one in mainIndex and see if it inherits correctly from
>> indexDefaults... if so, I can comment it out in the example and remove
>> one other
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> If you could, it would be great if you could test commenting out the
> one in mainIndex and see if it inherits correctly from
> indexDefaults... if so, I can comment it out in the example and remove
> one other little thing that people could get wrong.
>
Yep, it seems
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Andrew Clegg wrote:
> Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>>
>> Sorry Andrew, this is something that's bitten people before.
>> search for maxFieldLength and you will see *2* of them in your config
>> - one for indexDefaults and one for mainIndex.
>> The one in mainIndex is set
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> Sorry Andrew, this is something that's bitten people before.
> search for maxFieldLength and you will see *2* of them in your config
> - one for indexDefaults and one for mainIndex.
> The one in mainIndex is set at 1 and hence overrides the one in
> indexDefaults.
Sorry Andrew, this is something that's bitten people before.
search for maxFieldLength and you will see *2* of them in your config
- one for indexDefaults and one for mainIndex.
The one in mainIndex is set at 1 and hence overrides the one in
indexDefaults.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.co
Yep, I just re-indexed it again to make double sure -- same problem
unfortunately.
My solrconfig.xml and schema.xml are attached.
In case you want to see it in action on the same data I've got, I've tarred
up my data and conf directories here:
http://biotext.org.uk/static/solr-issue-example.ta
Yes, please show us your solrconfig.xml, and verify that you reindexed
the document after changing maxFieldLength and restarting solr.
I'll also see if I can reproduce a problem with maxFieldLength being ignored.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Andrew Cl
As it turns out I'm back to GET myself.
I just noticed that tomcat as well, although ultimately plan to run
under weblogic (not sure what the length on that url is and/or if there
are limits on the flex client doing the GET)
Reading the book (page 108) I noticed that my querys need to have more
I realized this is a bug in Solr and its fixed in 1.4. I downloaded a
recent nightly build and it fixed the problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-879
Thanks for the help,
Mike
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:18 PM, mike mulvaney wrote:
> I thought the stopwords might be the problem too
Hi there,
i must enhance solr config deploys.
I have a configuration file per environment and per role (Master-Slave) so i
want to separate DataSource definitions from the solrconfig.xml . Where can
i put them?
Same behaviour is desired for Master-Slave conf diffs.
Any help would be much apprec
The "name"-field is populated.
But I cannot see that solr gives me any suggestions based on that field.
Seems to work fine with the "keyword"-field tho.
Regards,
Steinar
Den 26. okt. 2009 kl. 10.38 skrev Avlesh Singh:
It should have worked as expected.
See if your "name" field is getting popul
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Pooja Verlani wrote:
> No I dont have the field with this type and neither do I want to re-index ..
> is it possible otherwise ?
Your documents don't need the "random" field, only your schema does.
The example schema already contains the following:
Add this to yo
Are you using the field name suffixes like Blacklight?xxx_text,
_xxx_facet, xxx_string? With the xxx_string field you can request
"begins with" search, but you may need some different search term
normalization than with a _text search.
Gerald Snyder
Florida Center for Library Automatio
No I dont have the field with this type and neither do I want to re-index ..
is it possible otherwise ?
2009/10/26 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> do you have a field whose type="random" . If yes then u can sort by that
> field
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Pooja Verlani
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
Morning,
Last week I was having a problem with terms visible in my search results in
large documents not causing query hits:
http://www.nabble.com/Result-missing-from-query%2C-but-match-shows-in-Field-Analysis-tool-td26029040.html#a26029351
Erick suggested it might be related to maxFieldLength,
On Oct 25, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Fair enough, I guess I was just kind of expecting a constant score
query + a
: function query to result in a score of whatever the function query
is. This
: is a common trick to sort by a function, but it's easy enough to
just ^0 the
do you have a field whose type="random" . If yes then u can sort by that field
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Pooja Verlani wrote:
> Hi,
> I want a random sort type in the search results. The scenario is:
> I want to return random results with no context relation to the query fired,
> if I am n
Hi,
I want a random sort type in the search results. The scenario is:
I want to return random results with no context relation to the query fired,
if I am not able to find any results relevant.
I want something like:
http://localhost:8083/solr/select/?q=*:*&sort=RANDOM.
Please suggest.
Regards,
P
It should have worked as expected.
See if your "name" field is getting populated.
Cheers
Avlesh
2009/10/26 Steinar Asbjørnsen
> Hi all.
>
> I'm currently working on setting up spelling suggestion functionality.
> What I'd like is to put the values of two fields ("keyword" and "name")into
> the
Hi all.
I'm currently working on setting up spelling suggestion functionality.
What I'd like is to put the values of two fields ("keyword" and "name")
into the spell-field.
Something like (from schema.xml):
multiValued="true"/>
...
As far as i can see I only get suggestions from the keyword
I thought the stopwords might be the problem too, but I am using the
same stopwords.txt in both instances, I think. The headline field is
a "text" type file, and I am using the "text" definition from the
example solr config:
>
> My guess is that Solr is treating this as a range query. I've tried
> escaping the word To with backslashes, but it doesn't seem to make a
> difference. Is there a way to tell Solr that "to" is not a special word in
> this instance?
>
Nope. Any occurrence of "to" in search term(s) does NOT ca
Read up of setting-up these kind searches here -
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/08/auto-suggest-from-popular-queries-using-edgengrams/
Cheers
Avlesh
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Bernadette Houghton <
bernadette.hough...@deakin.edu.au> wrote:
> We need to offer "begins with" typ
I'm having trouble searching for phrases that have the word "to" in
them. I have a bunch of articles indexed, and I need to be able to
search the headlines like this:
headline:"House Committee Leaders Ask FCC To Consider Spectrum in
Broadband Plan"
When I search like that, I get no hits. When I
46 matches
Mail list logo
