> Lowering the precisionStep of the trie field could help. With a
> precisionStep of 8, there would be 256 top-level terms to step over.
> If you lowered it to 6, it would cut it to 64 or 4 would cut it to 16.
>
> The fastest would be to index a separate field to indicate presence or
> absence of
Fellow Apache Solr users,
I have been working on a PHP extension for Apache Solr in C for quite
sometime now.
I just finished testing it and I have completed the initial user level
documentation of the API
Version 0.9.0-beta has just been released.
It already has built-in readiness for Solr 1.4
I am really surprised that a query for "behaviour" returns "behavior" as
a suggestion only when the parameter "spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=true"
is present. I re-read the documentation and I see nothing that will
imply that the parameter onlyMorePopular will do anything else but
filter the sugge
Thanks. I'll have to look into modifications then (was hoping to avoid that).
For clarity though I believe this point is slightly off:
>> "Adding the parameter onlyMorePopular limits the suggestions that solr can
>> give you(to ones that return more hits than the existing query), nothing
>> mor
: Is there any value for the "f.my_year_facet.facet.sort" parameter that will
: return the facet values in descending order? So far I only see "index" and
: "count" as the choices.
descending what?
(count is descending order by count)
-Hoss
Greg,
I apologize if I misunderstood your original post. I don't think there
is a way you can force solr to return suggestions when all of the words
are "correctly" spelled. Adding the parameter onlyMorePopular limits the
suggestions that solr can give you(to ones that return more hits than
t
On 10/02/2009 06:02 PM, darniz wrote:
Thanks
As i said it even works by giving double quotes too.
like carDescription:"austin martin"
So is that the conclusion that in order to map two word synonym i have to
always enclose in double quotes, so that it doen not split the words
Yes, but
Thanks for the response Christian. I'll modify my original point (1) then. Is
'onlyMorePopular' the only way to return suggestions when all of the search
terms are present in the dictionary (ie. correct)? Is there any way to force
behaviour (1) without behaviour (2) (filtering on frequency).
Ta
I believe your understanding in incorrect. The first behavior you
described is produced by adding the paremeter "spellcheck=true".
Suggestions will be returned regardless of whether there are results.
The only time I believe spelling suggestions might not be included is
when all of the words ar
Hi All,
If I understand correctly the flag 'onlyMorePopular' encapsulates two
independent behaviours. 1) It runs spell checking across queries that returned
hits. Without the flag spell checking is not run when results are found. 2) It
limits suggestions to terms with higher frequencies.
Is th
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Steve Conover wrote:
> Can't/won't...this is one part of a set of criteria, and those
> criteria can be pretty arbitrarily changed. I couldn't - with
> confidence - extract this part without possibly compromising the
> correctness of the result.
>
> Thanks for the
Can't/won't...this is one part of a set of criteria, and those
criteria can be pretty arbitrarily changed. I couldn't - with
confidence - extract this part without possibly compromising the
correctness of the result.
Thanks for the suggestion though...is there anything else to be done?
Anything I
Khooroos wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm new to Solr and have been reading online about it to get started for the
> past few days.
>
> Here are a few questions that I need help getting answer to:
>
> 1) Is my understanding of how Solr works correct:
> - From what I gather so far, I need to run the start.jar (wh
Hi,
I'm new to Solr and have been reading online about it to get started for the
past few days.
Here are a few questions that I need help getting answer to:
1) Is my understanding of how Solr works correct:
- From what I gather so far, I need to run the start.jar (which runs the
server) as a dae
Like most others, I use SolrJ and bind my beans with @Field annotations to
read responses from Solr.
For highlighting these properties in my bean, I always write a separate
piece - Get the list of highlights from response and then use the
Map> to put them back in my original bean.
This evening, I
Hi,
I've been trying to experiment with merging, but have been running into
some problems.
First, I'm using ruby and the solr-ruby-0.0.7 gem. It looks like there
is no support in that gem for merging. Have I overlooked something?
Second, I was attempting to just follow the instructions in
HI,
How to build the index from the commadd line using DataImportHandler, and also
see the intermediate results?
The expected syntax is like:
java -jar buildIndex.jar solrconfig.xml data-config.xml --verbose
Thanks.
17 matches
Mail list logo