Finally resolved the problem! The solution was 3-pronged on my windows PC-
Added to my.ini under mysqld-
default-character-set=utf8
collation_server=utf8_unicode_ci
character_set_server=utf8
skip-character-set-client-handshake
Added to JAVA_OPTS environmental variable –
-Dfile.encoding=UTF-8
Add
Thank you Martijn.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Martijn v Groningen <
martijn.is.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> Yes you are understanding is correct, but it is not possible to
> monitor these actions separately with Solr.
>
> Martijn
>
> 2009/9/1 Rahul R :
> > Hello,
> > I am trying t
I have a large document with various sections. Each section has a list of
keywords /phrases of interest. I have a master list of keywords/phrases
stored as a String array. How can I use Solr or Lucene to search each
section document for all keywords and basically give me which keywords were
found
: The wiki says "As of Solr 1.3, the DisMaxRequestHandler is simply the
: standard request handler with the default query parser set to the
: DisMax Query Parser (defType=dismax).". I just made a checkout of svn
: and dismax doesn't seems to be the default as :
that paragraph doesn't say that dism
: Is it possible to have the copyField strip off the payload while it is
: copying since doing it in the analysis phrase is too late? Or should I
: start looking into using UpdateProcessors as Chris had suggested?
"nope" and "yep"
I've had an idea in the back of my mind ofr a while now about add
: specified (again, using schema browser). The unique key field is marked as
: type textTight.
your uniqueKey field needs to be something where everydoc is only going to
produce a single token, if you are using textTight, and sending product
sku type data (as mentioned in another mesg in this t
: When I added numerical faceting to my checkout of solr (solr-1240) I basically
: copied date faceting and modified it to work with numbers instead of dates.
: With numbers I got a lot of doulbe-counted values as well. So to fix my
: problem I added an extra parameter to number faceting where you
: Is this a known behavior people are happy with, or should I file an issue
: asking for ranges in date-facets to be constructed to subtract one second
: from the end of each range (so that the effective range queries for my case
It's a known anoyance, but not something that seems to anoy people e
: lets say you filter your query on something and want to know how many
: distinct "categories" that your results comprise.
: then you can facet on the category field and count the number of facet
: values that are returned, right?
if you count the number of facet values returned you are getting
: is there an online resource or a book that contains a thorough list of
: tokenizers and filters available and their functionality?
:
: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
...from the intro on that page...
For a more complete list of what Tokenizers and TokenFilters co
"No results found for 'surface area 377', displaying all properties."
- why do we need SOLR then...
RE: http://www.mysecondhome.eu
I am browsing this website again (I have similar challenge at
http://www.casaGURU.com but still prefer database-SQL to search Professional
by service type)
I don't think SOLR is applicable in this specific case. I think standard DB
queries with predefined d
Hi Tim,
The value I'm using is a product SKU. A sample would be like: L49-4251.
Thanks
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timothy.j.har...@nasa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:52 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; cba...@cardin
What is the value of your uniqueKey?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Baird [mailto:cba...@cardinalcommerce.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 8:20 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Adding new docs, but duplicating instead of updating
Hi Tim,
I appreciate the sugge
wow, it looks like DIH already works with relational databases... thanks
again!
2009/9/1 Pablo Ferrari
> Thanks Aakash!
>
> I've looked at it and it looks very interesting, the problem is that my
> database is a relational model, therefore I don't have a table with all the
> information, but man
Thanks Aakash!
I've looked at it and it looks very interesting, the problem is that my
database is a relational model, therefore I don't have a table with all the
information, but many tables related to each other by their ids (primary
keys and foreign keys).
I've been thinking about using DataIm
Hello,
Solr is a great software, but I have some interrogations like :
The wiki says "As of Solr 1.3, the DisMaxRequestHandler is simply the
standard request handler with the default query parser set to the
DisMax Query Parser (defType=dismax).". I just made a checkout of svn
and dismax doesn't s
hi Pablo,
DataImportHandler might be the best option for you. check this link
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
regards,
aakash
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Pablo Ferrari wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new to the list and new to Solr. My name is Pablo, I'm from Spain and
> I'm dev
Are you running the latest versions of these logging libraries? I see nothing
in the 1.5.8 SLF4J Log4j adapter that would cause this.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server
On 9/1/09 10:49 AM, "Villemos, Gert" wrote:
We are using solrj 1.3 (with slf
Hi Tim,
I appreciate the suggestions. I can tell you that the document I ran the
second time was the same document run the first time -- so any questions of
field value shouldn't be a concern.
Thanks
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: Harsch, Timothy J. (ARC-SC)[PEROT SYSTEMS]
[mailto:timo
We are using solrj 1.3 (with slf4j) in a client also using Aperture
(with log4j 1.2.14). When executing a query I get the error shown below.
The request is never received by the server, i.e. the exception is
thrown before the request is issued.
I think I'm running into a compatibility issue bet
Thanks, Avlesh! I'll try the filter cache.
Anybody familiar enough with the caching implementation to chime in?
Michael
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> Good question!
> The application level cache, say filter cache, would still help because it
> not only caches values b
I could be off base here, maybe using textTight as unique key is a common SOLR
practice I don't know. But, It would seem to me that using any field type that
transforms a value (even if it is just whitespace removal) could be
problematic. Maybe not the source of your issue here, but I'd be wo
Hi Rahul,
Yes you are understanding is correct, but it is not possible to
monitor these actions separately with Solr.
Martijn
2009/9/1 Rahul R :
> Hello,
> I am trying to measure the benefit that I am getting out of using the filter
> cache. As I understand, there are two major parts to an fq qu
Hi All,
I'm running Solr in a multicore setup. I've set one of the cores to have a
specific field as the unique key (marked as the uniqueKey in the document
and the field is defined as required). I'm sending an command with
all the docs using a multipart post. After running the add file, I
Thanks for the reply Shalin.
Posted the stack trace on the Jira issue SOLR-1336.
-Kumar
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Error while indexing using SmartCh
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried using the patch provided for Solr-1336 JIRA issue for
> integrating Lucene's SmartChineseAnalyzer with Solr and tried testing it
> out but I faced the AbstractMethodError during indexing as well as
> Searching (stack trace
Hi,
I tried using the patch provided for Solr-1336 JIRA issue for
integrating Lucene's SmartChineseAnalyzer with Solr and tried testing it
out but I faced the AbstractMethodError during indexing as well as
Searching (stack trace below). There seems to be something wrong during
the tokenization of
Hi,
You know the level your currently in:
America/USA
You have the values for the location facet in the form:
America/USA/NYC/Chelsea...3
America/USA/NYC/East Village2
America/USA/San Francisco/Haight-Ashbury...5
America/USA/Los A
Thank you three for answers. After more research, I think I need to
use fuzzy search as I already know Levenshtein Distance and I don't
want to manage a list of synonyms manually. So "manually" spell check
isn't for me.
Thanks a lot.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>>
>> I want
Hi Stephen,
When I added numerical faceting to my checkout of solr (solr-1240) I
basically copied date faceting and modified it to work with numbers
instead of dates. With numbers I got a lot of doulbe-counted values as
well. So to fix my problem I added an extra parameter to number faceting
31 matches
Mail list logo
