Thanks, Avlesh! I'll try the filter cache. Anybody familiar enough with the caching implementation to chime in?
Michael On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Avlesh Singh <avl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Good question! > The application level cache, say filter cache, would still help because it > not only caches values but also the underlying computation. Even with all > the data in your RAM you will still end up doing the computations every > time. > > Looking for responses from the more knowledgeable. > > Cheers > Avlesh > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Michael <solrco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > If I've got my entire 20G 4MM document index in RAM (on a ramdisk), do I > > have a need for the document cache? Or should I set it to 0 items, > because > > pulling field values from an index in RAM is so fast that the document > > cache > > would be a duplication of effort? > > > > Are there any other caches that I should turn off if I can get my entire > > index in RAM? Filter cache, query results cache, etc? > > > > Thanks! > > Michael > > >
