yes, i meant field names.
Thanks for the information, that's perfect
regards,
Alexander
Shalin Shekhar Mangar schrieb:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Herzog
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm using dynamic fields and was wandering how to retrieve information
> > about used indices (weth
FYI, I'm on vacation in Ocean City MD starting tomorrow - but I will
have internet access.
The goal of releasing a week after 2.9 still seems very realistic - we
just need to decide to finish all open issues one week from Lucene's
code freeze. And all of a sudden, Lucene went from 0 open issues,
b
>
> "The Arab Presense" is returned when I search for ("arabic").
> "to confirm the existence of many communities.." is returned when i search
> for ("the existing").
>
All such results are returned back due to something known as stemming. The
stock "text" field definition comes bundled with a ste
And another option: implement simple proxy between SolrJ and rest of world...
As I understand in your design SOLR is behind Proxy which needs Cookie.
What I can't understand is: your web application uses SSO for authentication,
and it uses SolrJ to retrieve results from SOLR and present it to
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Phillip Farber wrote:
>
> What will the client receive from the primary solr instance if that
> instance doesn't get HTTP 200 from all the shards in a multi-shard query?
>
>
An exception is thrown. There's an open issue on returning partial
responses:
https://iss
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Herzog wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm using dynamic fields and was wandering how to retrieve information
> about used indices (wether they are empty and what actually do exist)
> via a a rest call?
>
Did you mean used field names instead of indices?
I think /admi
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> If he really needs to hardcode the cookie value into code, wouldn't it be
> easier to extend HttpClient and modify the methods which take in an
> HttpMethod object to first set the cookie on those obejcts before
> delegating to super?
>
>
Hi,
In every doc of mine, there is a sentence.
I tried to set the sentence to fieldtype as one of the three 'text',
'text_ws' and 'textTight'. None of them produce the correct result.
For eg.
"The Arab Presense" is returned when I search for ("arabic").
"to confirm the existence of many communi
thanks for the info.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Chris
Hostetter wrote:
>
> : I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
> : default. It could be in the thousands. So i can furture process the
> : returned json structure in my javascript.
>
> FAQ...
>
> http://wiki.
Imagine we have following sorted table for a whole Lucene index on term
values for a field, and a need to have top-10 facets for large resultset:
Digital: 1,700,000
Books: 1,000,000
Computers: 900,000
...
(term:count) sorted in desc order by "count" for a whole index; FilterCache
etc
Suppose that
: I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
: default. It could be in the thousands. So i can furture process the
: returned json structure in my javascript.
FAQ...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#head-ad538363dc33eba936af39b95ad0f0e719
Coming back to Question one
This is how my standard handler looks like
12
explicit
make,model
i added fl parameter which return me those fields described, for this also
i have to delete my browser cache and after that by defatul only those two
fields a
It seems possible to cache the results of facet queries on a per
segment basis, providing the caching you're describing.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
>>actually a hybrid that goes back to DocSet intersections when it's more
> efficient
>
> I noticed that too when I played wi
I guess you'd set the the rows parameter in the HTTP request to a high
number? Check out /solr/admin/form.jsp which has the rows text field
visible.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Elaine Li wrote:
> I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
> default. It could be in
I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
default. It could be in the thousands. So i can furture process the
returned json structure in my javascript.
Is such option? What should i do with the 'rows' number in the
solrconfig.xml file?
Thanks.
-
fast_warm
0
10
-
Ok, some improvement; "Faceting" as an end-user interface feature (or may be
"Filtering"?):
A. Faceting (for further filtering)
1. We are counting "facets"
2. Sorting by "counts" in descending order
3. Presenting top-N to user for possible filtering/narrowing search results
B.
"Simplified Lucene
I ended up not using an XML attribute for the payload since I need to return
the payload in query response. So I ended up going with:
2.0|Solr In Action
My payload is numeric so I can pick a non-numeric delimiter (ie '|').
Putting the payload in front means I don't have to worry about the delimi
>actually a hybrid that goes back to DocSet intersections when it's more
efficient
I noticed that too when I played with it, for large query results DocSet
intersections are de-facto standard; but when "faceting" started CNET had
only 400,000 documents :)
Nowadays even 2-3 seconds response time i
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> I was joking [off-topic]; "faceting" as a DocSet intersections' replaced by
> trivial term count calcs which is extremely faster in some (if not all) use
> cases, including possibly even NON-tokenized (with standard faceting we can
> use Filter
I was joking [off-topic]; "faceting" as a DocSet intersections' replaced by
trivial term count calcs which is extremely faster in some (if not all) use
cases, including possibly even NON-tokenized (with standard faceting we can
use FilterCache)...
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475
(and
I can't understand: do you use several web applications in a same container?
Are you trying to close shared SolrCore when one of many users (of another
application) logs off?
Usually one needs to clean up only user-session specific objects (such as
non-persistent shopping cart)...
-Original
I had similar task but I simply used SolrJ client for that; I was forced to
keep track on deleted docs in table_document... now, I am using "delete by
query" (with SolrJ) - each document has a timestamp which I query...
For instance, you can update (allowOverwrite=true) whole SOLR index, but put
c
I don't understand this point.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Remove-data-from-index-tp25063736p25080669.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you for your response, it just worked!
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Chris Male wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the cause of the problem is the WordDelimiterFilterFactory. With
> your current configuration indexing i-like results in 3 terms being indexed
> - i, like and ilike. Then when you
Hi ,
Thanks for your help.
So do I have to do:
public Scorer scorer(IndexReader reader) throws IOException {
SolrIndexReader solrReader = (SolrIndexReader) reader;
int offset = solrReader.getBase() ;
Or is it a bit more complex than that?
Jerome.
2009/8/20 Mark Miller :
> Jérôme Etévé wrot
you can write a onImportEnd event handler also
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:28 PM, clico wrote:
>
>
> hossman wrote:
>>
>> : > The request I would like to write is
>> : >
>> : > "Delete from my solr Index the id that are no longer present in my
>> : > table_document"
>> : >
>> : > With Lucene I had a
Hi
I'm using dynamic fields and was wandering how to retrieve information
about used indices (wether they are empty and what actually do exist)
via a a rest call?
I get a list of fieldnames at the admin location and I wanted to
retrieve this information in my php application.
Thanks,
Alexander
hossman wrote:
>
> : > The request I would like to write is
> : >
> : > "Delete from my solr Index the id that are no longer present in my
> : > table_document"
> : >
> : > With Lucene I had a way to do that :
> : > open IndexReader,
> : > for each lucene document : check in table_document and r
Hi,
I think the cause of the problem is the WordDelimiterFilterFactory. With
your current configuration indexing i-like results in 3 terms being indexed
- i, like and ilike. Then when you query for ilike, you match the 3rd
term. The term ilike is created by the WordDelimiterFilter due to the
ca
29 matches
Mail list logo
