On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Jianbin Dai wrote:
>
> Oh, I guess I didn't say it clearly in my post.
> I didn't use wild cards in xpath. My question was how to index attributes
> "id" and "mid" in the following xml file.
>
>
>
>
>30
Oh, I guess I didn't say it clearly in my post.
I didn't use wild cards in xpath. My question was how to index attributes "id"
and "mid" in the following xml file.
301.46
In the data-config.xml, I use
but what are the xpath for
Hi Pual, but in your previous post, you said "there is already an issue for
writing to Solr in multiple threads SOLR-1089". Do you think use solrj alone
would be better than DIH?
Thanks and have a good weekend!
--- On Fri, 5/22/09, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् wrote:
> no need to use embedded
how do you know it is not being executed ?. use deltaImportQuery also
if you are using Solr1.4
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Michael Korthuis
wrote:
> I have the data-config.xml detailed below (Stripped down a bit for
> simplicity) -
> When I run the delta import, the design_template delta q
no need to use embedded Solrserver. you can use SolrJ with streaming
in multiple threads
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Jianbin Dai wrote:
>
> If I do the xml parsing by myself and use embedded client to do the push,
> would it be more efficient than DIH?
>
>
> --- On Fri, 5/22/09, Grant Inger
wild cards are not supported . u must use full xpath
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Jianbin Dai wrote:
>
> I have an xml file like this
>
>
>
>
> 301.46
>
>
> In the data-config.xml, I use
>
>
> but how can I index "id", "mid"?
>
> T
are you using delta-import w/o a deltaImportQuery ? pls paste the
relevant portion of data-config.xml
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Eric Pugh
wrote:
> I am getting this error:
>
> Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: You
> have an error in your SQL syntax; che
I'm thinking using clustering (SOLR-769) function for my project.
I have a couple of questions:
1. if q=*:* is requested, Carrot2 will receive "MatchAllDocsQuery"
via attributes. Is it OK?
2. I'd like to use it on an environment other than English, e.g. Japanese.
I've implemented Carrot2Japanese
Hm, are you sure this is not a network/switch/disk/something like that problem?
Also, precisely because you have such a large index I'd avoid optimizing the
index and then replicating it. My wild guess is that simply rsyncing this much
data over the network kills your machines. Have you tried
Hi all,
We recently started running into this solr slave server freeze up problem.
After looking into the logs and the timing of such occurrences, it seems
that the problem always follows the first replication after an
optimization. Once the server freezes up, we are unable to ssh into it, but
pi
I have an xml file like this
301.46
In the data-config.xml, I use
but how can I index "id", "mid"?
Thanks.
I have the data-config.xml detailed below (Stripped down a bit for
simplicity) -
When I run the delta import, the design_template delta query is running and
modified rows are being returned. However, the parentDeltaQuery is never
executed.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Micahael
I have the data-config.xml detailed below (Stripped down a bit for
simplicity) -
When I run the delta import, the design_template delta query is running and
modified rows are being returned. However, the parentDeltaQuery is never
executed.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Micahael
Eric,
WHERE institution_id=1433
vs.
WHERE institution_id==1433
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Eric Pugh
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 2:43:59 PM
> Subject: DIH uses == instead of = in SQ
Greetings - first post here - hoping someone can direct me - grasping
at straws. thank you in advance. Jodi
I'm trying to tune the sort order using a combination of document and
query time boosts. When searching for the term 'builder' with almost
identical quantities of this term, and a mu
I am getting this error:
Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException:
You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that
corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use
near '=='1433'' at line 1
at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructo
Marco,
Open-source can be good like that. :)
See http://www.jroller.com/otis/entry/lucene_solr_nutch_amazing_tech for a
similar example
Ciao,
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Branca Marco
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org
If the file numbers and index size was increasing, that means Solr was still
working. It's possible it's taking extra long because of such high settings.
Bring them both down and try. For example, don't go over 20 with mergeFactor,
and try just 1GB for ramBufferSizeMB.
Bona fortuna!
Otis
Thank you very much for the instantaneous support.
I couldn't find the conflict for hours :(
When I have a response for the ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory I will write it on
the mailing-list.
Thanks again,
Marco
Da: Ensdorf Ken [ensd...@zoominfo.com]
Invia
Old email. Hoss, thanks for doing this. I had a closer look at my
solrconfig.xml and found that I didn't put elements around the settings
for caches. Solr didn't complain, so I didn't notice earlier...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Messa
> When I try testing the filter "solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" I get
> different results calling the following urls:
>
> 1. http://[server-ip]:[server-port]/solr/[core-
> name]/select/?q=all%3Apapa&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on
> 2. http://[server-ip]:[server-port]/solr/[core-
> name]/sele
Hi,
I am experiencing problems using filters.
I'm using the following version of Solr:
solr/nightly of 2009-04-12
The part of the schema.xml I'm using for setting filters is the following:
If I do the xml parsing by myself and use embedded client to do the push, would
it be more efficient than DIH?
--- On Fri, 5/22/09, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> Subject: Re: How to index large set data
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Friday, May 22, 2009, 5:38 A
I dont know exactly what is this 3G Ram buffer used. But what I noticed was
both index size and file number were keeping increasing, but stuck in the
commit.
--- On Fri, 5/22/09, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> From: Otis Gospodnetic
> Subject: Re: How to index large set data
> To: solr-user@luce
I have included the configuration and the log for the error on startup. I
does appear it tries to load the lib but then simply can't referene it.
explicit
0.01
productId^10.0
personality^15.0
subCate
Master work. This is exactly what I'm looking for. Now I'm happy :)
Gr, Reza
On May 22, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Reza,
You can't have multiple Solr instances write to the same index at
the same time.
But you can add documents to a single Solr instance in parallel
(e.g. f
Hi,
Those settings are a little "crazy". Are you sure you want to give Solr/Lucene
3G to buffer documents before flushing them to disk? Are you sure you want to
use the mergeFactor of 1000? Checking the logs to see if there are any errors.
Look at the index directory to see if Solr is actu
Reza,
You can't have multiple Solr instances write to the same index at the same time.
But you can add documents to a single Solr instance in parallel (e.g. from
multiple threads of one or more applications) and Solr will do the right thing
without you having to put JMS or some other type of qu
there is already an issue for writing to Solr in multiple threads SOLR-1089
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Can you parallelize this? I don't know that the DIH can handle it, but
> having multiple threads sending docs to Solr is the best performance wise,
> so maybe yo
Can you parallelize this? I don't know that the DIH can handle it,
but having multiple threads sending docs to Solr is the best
performance wise, so maybe you need to look at alternatives to pulling
with DIH and instead use a client to push into Solr.
On May 22, 2009, at 3:42 AM, Jianbin
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Ashish P wrote:
>
> I want to add master slave configuration for solr. I have following solr
> configuration:
> I am using solr 1.3 on windows. I am also using EmbeddedSolrServer.
> In this case is it possible to perform master slave configuration??
>
> My second q
On May 22, 2009, at 4:40 AM, Stanislaw Osinski wrote:
Hi there,
Is it possbile to specify more than one snippet field or should I
use copy
field to copy copy two or three field into single field and specify
it in
snippet field.
Currently, you can specify only one snippet field, so you
Hi,
One of the problems I have with Lucene is Lock obtained by the
IndexWriter. I want to use one Solr running inside a cluster behind
the load balancer. Are multiple webservers able to write and commit to
Lucene using Solr with out locking issues etc? Is Solr the solution
for concurrency
I want to add master slave configuration for solr. I have following solr
configuration:
I am using solr 1.3 on windows. I am also using EmbeddedSolrServer.
In this case is it possible to perform master slave configuration??
My second question is if I user solr 1.4 which has solr replication usin
Hi there,
> Is it possbile to specify more than one snippet field or should I use copy
> field to copy copy two or three field into single field and specify it in
> snippet field.
Currently, you can specify only one snippet field, so you'd need to use
copy.
Cheers,
S.
Hi,
good feature to have,
maintaining top N would also require storing all the search queries
done so far and keep updating (or atleast in some time window).
having pluggable persistent storage for all time search queries would be great.
tell me how can I help?
-umar
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12
about 2.8 m total docs were created. only the first run finishes. In my 2nd
try, it hangs there forever at the end of indexing, (I guess right before
commit), with cpu usage of 100%. Total 5G (2050) index files are created. Now I
have two problems:
1. why it hangs there and failed?
2. how can i
I think this problem might happen when there are uncommitted changes in S2
and the master S1 comes back online. In that case, slave's generation is
still less than master's and installation of index diff from master may
fail.
However, I do not understand a few points. Damien, if S1 comes back onli
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Anshuman Manur wrote:
> ahI see! thank you so much for the response!
>
> I'm using SolrJ, so I probably don't need to set XML version since the wiki
> tells me that it uses binary as a default!
>
>
Solrj automatically adds the correct version parameter/value.
39 matches
Mail list logo