AFAIK, you're going to have to code something up. Do remember to add CDATA
tags to your xml.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:31 PM, KennyN wrote:
>
> This functionality is possible 'out of the box', right? Or am I going to
> need
> to code up something that reads in the id named files and generates t
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Sameer Maggon wrote:
> I have been playing around with replication in Solr 1.4 and I must say that
> it's a big "ease of use" improvement over scripts. Though, I have a few
> questions about it.
>
> *1. Is there a way to specify multiple master URLs in the slaves
I'm not sure if this is possible in solr, but could it be done in a
tiered approach, where 10 slaves read from the master, and then 9
slaves read from each of those 10 slaves? That's 101 boxes...
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sameer Maggon wrote:
> I have been playing around with replication
Thanks for the replies!
-Original Message-
From:
solr-user-return-19429-laurent.vauthrin=disney@lucene.apache.org
[mailto:solr-user-return-19429-laurent.vauthrin=disney@lucene.apache
.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Runo
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
This might be possible with the Solr Cell contrib (i.e
ExtractingRequestHandler) since it can parse XML and extract from XML,
but that it is slightly different from what you are asking for, I
think. See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler You
might also want to check out
I have been playing around with replication in Solr 1.4 and I must say that
it's a big "ease of use" improvement over scripts. Though, I have a few
questions about it.
*1. Is there a way to specify multiple master URLs in the slaves? *
I want to make sure I have redundancy, and if one master goes
We're currently using 1.4 in production right now, using a recent
nightly. It's working fine for us.
Thanks for your time!
Matthew Runo
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
mr...@zappos.com - 702-943-7833
On Mar 10, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Vauthrin, Laurent wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the
OK, SOLR-1060 created.
>To this requirement I would add the basic requirement that this file
>(what Fergus calls the manifest to which I still don't agree)
>represents a update-set and that there should be a delete-set as well.
>
>ChangeSetEntityProcessor, on there I would jump with two feet.
I've been working with the mid-April assumption.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: "Vauthrin, Laurent"
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:25:01 PM
> Subject: Version 1.4 of Solr
>
> Hello,
>
This functionality is possible 'out of the box', right? Or am I going to need
to code up something that reads in the id named files and generates the xml
file?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-configuration-with-Text-files-tp22438201p22440095.html
Sent from the Solr -
This functionality is possible 'out of the box', right? Or am I going to need
to code up something that reads in the id named files and generates the xml
file?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-configuration-with-Text-files-tp22438201p22440089.html
Sent from the Solr -
Hello,
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this, but I'm wondering if I
could get a rough timeline of when version 1.4 of Solr might be out?
I'm trying to figure out whether we will be able to use the new built-in
replication as opposed to the current rsync collection distribution.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Sammy Yu wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I'm trying to limit the size of my index and one of the things I
> have done is to not populate certain fields when the majority of the
> document have that value. For example, if most of my documents in my
> index have a field col
Hi guys,
I'm trying to limit the size of my index and one of the things I
have done is to not populate certain fields when the majority of the
document have that value. For example, if most of my documents in my
index have a field color which has the value green I will not populate
that field.
I am trying to figure out how to configure Solr. I have worked with the
example and have been reading over the wiki, and am having some difficulty
figuring out how I would setup this simple scenario:
index a large number of text files(they aren't the csv files solr can ingest
directly) that are n
Hello All,
> Am trying to implement spell checker in
> the Solr search. I am able to get the suggestions by passing
> 'spellcheck=true'. But I want the search results from the spell
> corrected word.
> How do I achieve that?. T
> Hello All,
> Am trying to implement spell checker in the Solr
> search. I am able to get the suggestions by passing
> 'spellcheck=true'. But I want the search results from the spell
> corrected word.
> How do I achieve that?. Thanks in Advance.
>
> Tha
Hi Eric,
Thanks for your response.
Yes you are right! Am trying to place POJOs into Solr directly and this is
working fine.
I want to search them based on the object properties, need to organize them
in a heirarchy but not by package names.
Something like:
/Repository
|
|_ Folder1
After more tests... I think that the problem is... as I optimize before every
snapshot the hard links will point to completely differemt i-nodes. Once I
delete the snapshots seems that Tomcat has "knid of pointers" that keep
pointing to the removed snapshots so the system still thinks that shouldn
Are you trying to Java objects in Solr in order to be searchable? How
about just dumping them as text using POJO <--> to text formats such
as JSON or Betwixt (http://commons.apache.org/betwixt/).
Then you can just search on the package structure...
?q=com.abc.lucene.* to return everything u
Someone please throw some light on this post.
Thanks in advance.
Praveen_Kumar_J wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I just upload simple POJOs into Solr by creating custom types and dynamic
> fields in Solr schema as shown below,
>
> ...
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
>
> stored="true
Sean Timm wrote:
We too use Heritrix. We tried Nutch first but Nutch was not finding all
of the documents that it was supposed to. When Nutch and Heritrix were
both set to crawl our own site to a depth of three, Nutch missed some
pages that were linked directly from the seed. We ended up with 10%
Hi All,
I found out that reason the strings are not getting sorted is because there is
no way to pass the locale information to StrField, I ended up extending
StrField to take an additional attribute in schema.xml and then had to override
the getSortString method where in I create a new Locale
To this requirement I would add the basic requirement that this file
(what Fergus calls the manifest to which I still don't agree)
represents a update-set and that there should be a delete-set as well.
ChangeSetEntityProcessor, on there I would jump with two feet.
paul
Le 10-mars-09 à 05:4
Hi Tushar,
You can try this it works out well,
.
...
and have unique key and default search fields enabled.
.
Java code for the new custom type,
public class TestType extends FieldType{
@Field
private String id_s_i_s_nm;
@Field
private String pNumber;
@Field
25 matches
Mail list logo
