I'm not sure if this is possible in solr, but could it be done in a tiered approach, where 10 slaves read from the master, and then 9 slaves read from each of those 10 slaves? That's 101 boxes...
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Sameer Maggon <mag...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been playing around with replication in Solr 1.4 and I must say that > it's a big "ease of use" improvement over scripts. Though, I have a few > questions about it. > > *1. Is there a way to specify multiple master URLs in the slaves? * > I want to make sure I have redundancy, and if one master goes down the > slaves automatically start taking data from the other master. If not, has > anyone tried a load balancer approach where you put the multiple masters > behind the LB and have slaves talk to the LB? > * > 2. Is there a plan to add multicast support to Solr Replication? > *If I have ~100 slaves talking to the master over rsync - I see two problems > > a. Network > b. Master being choked as it's getting requests from 100 machines > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > Sameer. > -- > http://www.productification.com > -- Jonathan Haddad http://www.rustyrazorblade.com
