Re: arcane queryParser parseException

: I went ahead and added it since it does not hurt anything to escape more : things -- it just makes the final string ugly. : In 1.3 the escape method covered everything: H good call, i didn't realize the escape method had been so blanket in 1.3. this way we protect people who were usi

Re: arcane queryParser parseException

On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:13 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : server:/solr/select?q=field:"'anything' anything can go here\;" -- > No : problem (but ClientUtils's escape does not escape semicolons.) ClientUtils doesn't escape it because it's not a special character in the SolrQueryParser. I w

Re: arcane queryParser parseException

: server:/solr/select?q=field:"'anything' anything can go here\;" --> No : problem (but ClientUtils's escape does not escape semicolons.) ClientUtils doesn't escape it because it's not a special character in the SolrQueryParser. it *is* a special character to the OldLuceneQParserPlugin if (and

sint vs integer

What are the differences between using an sint and an integer, aside from the range queries on sint? If I've indexed a field as an integer, and I try to sort on it, will there be performance problem? About 1.5 million documents in index. -- Jonathan Haddad http://www.rustyrazorblade.com

arcane queryParser parseException

server:/solr/select?q=field:"''anything can go here;" --> Lexical error, encountered after : "\"\'\'anything can go here" server:/solr/select?q=field:"'anything' anything can go here;" --> Same problem server:/solr/select?q=field:"'anything' anything can go here\;" --> No problem (but ClientUtils

Re: general survey of master/replica setups

Hi Brian, If you have enough servers - take that machine that's doing snapinstall out of the pool for a bit, do snapinstall, warm it up well, put it back in the pool. You'd really need to have enough servers, so that when you do this you can avoid having multiple live query slaves with differ

Direct control over document position in search results

Hello, I was wondering if there was any facility to directly manipulate search results based on business criteria to place documents at a fixed position in those results. For example, when I issue a query, the first four results would be based on natural search relevancy, then the fifth result

AW: Where are the facets configured?

>> My problem is; where are the facets defined? I expect to se them in the >> configuration, yet I dont. >Solr can facet "on the fly". The first time you request faceting on a > field, it may take longer though as internal data structures are built > and cached. The only current requirement is

Re: Where are the facets configured?

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Villemos, Gert wrote: > My problem is; where are the facets defined? I expect to se them in the > configuration, yet I dont. Solr can facet "on the fly". The first time you request faceting on a field, it may take longer though as internal data structures are bu

Where are the facets configured?

New to Lucene / SOLr, but reading and learning fast. I'm missing some fundamental mental link to understand how the facetted browsing works in SOLr. I have read the Wiki pages on facets and on configuration files. I have looked in the examples provided with SOLr. And searched Google / the mail

general survey of master/replica setups

Say you have a bunch of solr servers that index new data, and then some replica/"slave" setup that snappulls from the master on a cron or some schedule. Live internet facing queries hit the replica, not the master, as indexes/commits on the master slow down queries. But even the query-only solr ins

Re: embedded wildcard search not working?

Some of the wildcards work, but not all of them. Unsurprisingly, the ones that seem to work are ones that are wildcards in the 'base' of the word. Thanks for the tip on the lowercase before stop words. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Jim

Re: exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers

Hi Shalin,   Which auto-warming I have to remove to make commits faster. The below configuration have in solrconfig.xml. Also, what is maxWarmingSearchers value.                  Thanks for your help!! Thanks & Regards, Mahendra --- On Mon, 2/23/09, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: From: Shalin

Re: LocalSolr distributed search

Great this works. BTW, there seems to be a problem w/ LocalSolrQueryComponent. It doesn't seem to be respecting any filtering parameters in the solr request (fq). thanks, Rajiv pjaol wrote: > > Hi > > Most of the localsolr / locallucene doc's are a little out of date I'll > get to updating

Re: Question about etag

I finally found the reason of this behavior. I realize that if I waited a couple of minutes, Firefox would send the "if-none-match" header which was responded by the 304 code by solr. What happens is that Firefox keeps a disk cache. If a response contains the header "Last-Modified", even if there

Re: fastest way to index/reindex

please don't hijack topic threads, start a new one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking Best Erick MergeFactor isn't very related to searching, Luke isn't used in the indexing process and why do you care how fast Luke is? When you start a new post on this topic, please give an idea of

Re: fastest way to index/reindex

How fast is the search if the MergeFactor of Lucene Index is set to 20 or more?did somebody uses Luke to optimize the indexing process? I would like to know how fast is Luke. Thanks On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ian Connor wrote: > When you query by *:*, what order does it use. Is there a ch

Re: Defining shards in solrconfig with multiple cores

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:12 AM, jdleider wrote: > How can I be sure the shards are applying the same boosts as the one > receiving the query? Defaults always apply at any search handler... so if you put default params on /business, they will become part of the shard sub-requests. You can verify

Re: Defining shards in solrconfig with multiple cores

Excellent, I have created a new request handler that has all my shards, boosts and other defaults as /business. /select is set to be the default request handler. The queries seem to run fine now and after a bit of spot checking they seem to be getting the same results. I have one question though.

Re: Boosting Code

If you mean at indexing time, you set field boost via data-config.xml. That boost is parsed from there and set to the lucene document going through DocBuilder,java, SolrInputDocuemnt.java and DocuemntBuilder.java In case you want to set full-document boost (not just to a field) you can do it setti

Re: Distributed Search

gwk wrote: Hello, The wiki states 'When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses the first doc and discards subsequent ones', I was wondering whether "the first doc" is the doc of the shard which responds first or the doc in the first shard in the shards GET parameter? Regards, gwk

Re: faceted query - min and max numeric values

Have a look at the StatsComponent, added after Solr 1.3 release though. You can grab a nightly build to have it built-in. More info available here: Erik On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:10 AM, Yves Hougardy wrote: Hi,I'm trying to

faceted query - min and max numeric values

Hi,I'm trying to set up a request with two "query.facet" which would give me the Min a Max prices over all the query results. What i'm interested in is not really the facet counts but those two prices... Faceting on the price field would enumerate all the different prices w/ their facet count. On t

Distributed Search

Hello, The wiki states 'When duplicate doc IDs are received, Solr chooses the first doc and discards subsequent ones', I was wondering whether "the first doc" is the doc of the shard which responds first or the doc in the first shard in the shards GET parameter? Regards, gwk

Re: Error with highlighter and UTF-8 chars?

We are using Solr trunk (1.4) - currently " nightly exported - yonik - 2009-02-05 08:06:00" -Peter On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Jacob, > > What Solr version are you using? There is a bug in SolrHighlighter of Solr > 1.3, > you may want to look at: > > https://issues.

Re: Error with highlighter and UTF-8 chars?

Jacob, What Solr version are you using? There is a bug in SolrHighlighter of Solr 1.3, you may want to look at: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-925 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1500 regards, Koji Jacob Singh wrote: Hi, We ran into a weird one today. We have a

Re: delta-import not giving updated records

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:09 PM, con wrote: > > HI > > I made that change of quotes and case sensitivity. But now i am getting the > below exception while running delta-import: > > Document # 1 >at > org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.JdbcDataSource$ResultSetIterator.(JdbcDataSource.java:1

Re: Persistent, seemingly unfixable corrupt indices

Actually, even in 2.3.1, CheckIndex checks for docs-out-of-order both within and across segments, so now I'm at a loss as to why it's not catching your case. Any of these indexes small enough to post somewhere i could access? Mike James Brady wrote: Hi,My indices sometime become corr

Re: Persistent, seemingly unfixable corrupt indices

This is spooky! First off, why are you hitting so much index corruption? Many classes of failure (unhandled exception exits JVM, JVM killed or SEGVs, OS crashes, power cord is pulled, etc.) should never result in index corruption. Other failures (bad RAM, bad hard drives) can easily ca

Re: delta-import not giving updated records

HI I made that change of quotes and case sensitivity. But now i am getting the below exception while running delta-import: Document # 1 at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.JdbcDataSource$ResultSetIterator.(JdbcDataSource.java:186) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.JdbcDataS