Thanks Erik, that helped me a lot ...
but still have somthing, i am not sure about:
If i am using a custom sort - like the DistanceComparator example described
in "oh" your book - and i debugged the code and seem to understand that
the the distances-array is created for all indexed documents - n
We believe that the filters/forward issue is likely something specific
to weblogic. Specifically that other containers have filters disabled
on forward by default, where as weblogic has them enabled.
We dont think the small modification we had to make to headers.jsp are
weblogic specific.
Thanks everyone!! Finally got a solution for this problem on Jetty Server.
Instead of setting Java system variables like
JAVA_OPTS=-Dsolr.solr.home="C:\SOLR\apache-solr-1.3.0\apache-solr-1.3.0\example\solr",
we can provide the vm arguments directly while starting the jetty server.
I am running
it is safe to use different column names as Shalin suggested. After
all a row is a map with the column value as the key. If you map
multiple values to the same column it may overwrite each other. use
explicit 'name' attributes
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Wed,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : > The solr data field is populated properly. So I guess that bit works.
> : > I really wish I could use xpath="//para"
>
> : The limitation comes from streaming the XML instead of creating a DOM.
> : XPathRecordReader is a custom streami
Great, thanks for that, Chris!
2009/2/3 Chris Hostetter
>
> : Hi, no the data_added field was one per document.
>
> i would suggest adding multiValued="false" to your "date" fieldType so
> that Solr can enforce that for you -- otherwise we can't be 100% sure.
>
> if it really is only a single va
For what it's worth, I bumped into
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-854 on a recent Jetty installation
when trying to set up Solr for a test run, so setting via JNDI may end
up causing even more heartburn. I ended up just using Tomcat.
V/R,
Nicholas Piasecki
Software Developer
Skiviez, Inc.
: Till now I was working with the jetty server bundled with the SOLR
: distribution. But I want to deploy solr.war to another jetty server. Here I
: am facing some problem with solr/home. Whenever I start the jetty server, I
: get the following error -
...
: INFO: solr home defaulted to 's
: > The solr data field is populated properly. So I guess that bit works.
: > I really wish I could use xpath="//para"
: The limitation comes from streaming the XML instead of creating a DOM.
: XPathRecordReader is a custom streaming XPath parser implementation and
: streaming is easy only becaus
Nothing in the Junk folder, but that reminded me that our company is using a
3rd party spam filter (i.e., Lanlogic)... which sure enough had snagged the
confirmation emails. Since the list emails were going through I never thought
to check the filtering systems. Thanks for jogging my memory. :
: Hi, no the data_added field was one per document.
i would suggest adding multiValued="false" to your "date" fieldType so
that Solr can enforce that for you -- otherwise we can't be 100% sure.
if it really is only a single valued field, then i suspect you're right
about the index corruption b
: I've one server and several slaves and I would like to know if I go to the
: host.name/solr/admin/stat.jsp if there is a way to know the difference of
: the numDoc per server?
i don't really understand your question -- sure you can go to that page
on each server and compare the number of docs
: I guess I got the wrong impression initially. These classes extend the
: RequestHandlerBase.
your confusion is totally understandable, and stemms from some confusion
legacy naming convention. there is an "UpdateHandler" API which
is a low level API for dictating how changes are made to the
: Just to clarify - we do not optimize on the slaves at all. We only optimize
: on the master.
that doesn't change anything about hte comments that i made before. it
*really* wouldn't make sense to optimize on a slave right before pulling a
new snapshot, but it still doesn't make any more sens
: Subject: Unsubscribing
:
: I've tried multiple times to unsubscribe from this list using the proper
: method (mailto:solr-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org), but it's not
: working! Can anyone help with that?
Did you get a confirmation email from the mailing list software asking you
to ve
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Fergus McMenemie wrote:
> dataSource="myfilereader"
> processor="XPathEntityProcessor"
> url="${jc.fileAbsolutePath}"
> stream="false"
> forEach="/record">
>
>
>
>
>
> Below is the line from my schema.xml
>
> multiValued=
: I am still struggling with this... but I guess would it be because for some
: data there are maximum interger values for the fields "start_year"
: "end_year", like "2.14748365E9", which solr does not recognise as "sfloat",
: because there is a "E" letter?
when you say you are using "sfloat", t
: Is it possible to define more than one schema? I'm reading the example
: schema.xml. It seems that we can only define one schema? What about if I
: want to define one schema for document type A and another schema for
: document type B?
there are lots of ways to tackle a problem like this, de
But as far as I understand the total number of constraints is limited (there
is a default value), so I cannot know the total if I don't set the
facet.limit to a really big number and then the request takes a long time. I
was wondering if there was a way to get the total number (e.g. 100.000
constra
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM, wojtekpia wrote:
> I noticed your wiki post about sorting with a function query instead of the
> Lucene sort mechanism. Did you see a significantly reduced memory footprint
> by doing this?
FunctionQuery derives field values from the FieldCache... so it would
use
I noticed your wiki post about sorting with a function query instead of the
Lucene sort mechanism. Did you see a significantly reduced memory footprint
by doing this? Did you reduce the number of fields you allowed users to sort
by?
Lance Norskog-2 wrote:
>
> Sorting creates a large array with
Hello,
Searching for ?q=*:* with facetting turned on gives me the total number
of available constraints, if that is what you mean.
Cheers,
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 16:03 +, Bruno Aranda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if is there a way to get the total number of different
> facets r
Hi,
I would like to know if is there a way to get the total number of different
facets returned by a faceted search? I see already that I can paginate
through the facets with the facet.offset and facet.limit, but there is a way
to know how many facets are found in total?
For instance,
NameSu
Hi Ben,
Look at this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Ben Incani
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2009 1:52:05 AM
> Subject: field range (min and max
Thanks Ralf,
Yeah... I can add the system preoprty through web.xml. But as I am deploying
my application for a production environment, I dont want to make changes to
web.xml. :confused:
Kraus, Ralf | pixelhouse GmbH wrote:
>
> Manupriya schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Till now I was working with the jet
Manupriya schrieb:
Hi,
Till now I was working with the jetty server bundled with the SOLR
distribution. But I want to deploy solr.war to another jetty server. Here I
am facing some problem with solr/home. Whenever I start the jetty server, I
try to extract the solr.war and edit the web.xml !
G
Hi,
Till now I was working with the jetty server bundled with the SOLR
distribution. But I want to deploy solr.war to another jetty server. Here I
am facing some problem with solr/home. Whenever I start the jetty server, I
get the following error -
---
I just opened an issue explaining my solution:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1004
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Marc Sturlese
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Doing that, once a doc is aborted in DocBuilder, it will not keep
>> checking
>> all other docs and abo
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> Doing that, once a doc is aborted in DocBuilder, it will not keep checking
> all other docs and abort will finish soon.
> I think it could be done in the function deleteAll(deletedKeys); in case
> the
> amount of docs to delete is huge aswel
Hey Shalin,
I have been testing de abort command and for full-import there's no problem.
In delta-import, at DocBuilder.java I have seen it checks for
if (stop.get())
before executing deleteAll and inside collectDelta (in doDelta function).
The problem is that once you have the Set> with all de
Thanks, that's exactly what I need.
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Marc Sturlese
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey there,
>> I would like to know if there is any way to stop a dela-import or a
>> full-import in the middle of the ejecution and free Tomcats memory.
>
>
> Th
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Marc Sturlese wrote:
>
> Hey there,
> I would like to know if there is any way to stop a dela-import or a
> full-import in the middle of the ejecution and free Tomcats memory.
There is an 'abort' command for DIH which should do what you want. Most of
the DIH relat
Hey there,
I would like to know if there is any way to stop a dela-import or a
full-import in the middle of the ejecution and free Tomcats memory.
In case not... is there any way to tell Solr to stop all actions and free
all memory that is using?
Is it possible to do one of both things without res
33 matches
Mail list logo
