Hi Anoop,
If you are willing to go a little cutting edge, you might want to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561
The patch is a little out of date. I shall post a new one soon. The patch
allows for index and configuration replication (except for solrconfig.xml on
which we are wo
Erik,
I just got this to work myself and the documentation was only partially helpful
in figuring it out. Two main points on making this work via sor1j:
#1 - Define the mlt handles in solrconfig.xml (it's not defined in the example
solrconfig.xml I was using):
#2 - with Solrj, access the mlt
Hi!
Have been going though the documentation for the more like this/these
feature
but haven't found anything about how to use it in Solrj.
Regards Erik
Hi,
In such setup, you would definitely want to use zookeeper in
conjunction with Solr for at least two things :
a) deploy management / (having cron-based pulls for a 128-node setup
could be a nightmare without appropriate sync guarantees,
coordination, etc)
b) configuration distribution
Maybe, and I haven't followed your details sorry, an issue is the lib
directory for plugins. Under the solr home directory you can put a
lib/ subdirectory with the data import handler JAR and it's
dependencies (that aren't already in the WAR's WEB-INF/lib).
To deploy Solr into Tomcat, you
On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:11 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
w/ faceting qtime is around +200ms.
if your target time is 250, this will need some work... but lets
ignore that for now...
qtime for a standard query on the default search field is less than
100ms.
Usually around 60ms.
qtime for id: i
Hi Con,
In our project, we found it useful to construct a pseudo uniquekey based
on the rowtype and row uniqueid, ie
> -Original Message-
> From: con [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 October 2008 6:47 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Pr
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Jason Rennie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried J-W and *yes* it seems to do a much better job! I'd certainly
> vote for that becoming the default :)
>
Ack! I did some more testing and J-W results started to get weird
(including suggesting "courses" for "c
w/ faceting qtime is around +200ms.
qtime for a standard query on the default search field is less than 100ms.
Usually around 60ms.
qtime for id: is around 16ms.
ryantxu wrote:
>
>> -
>>
>> 6727.0
>> -
>>
>> 6457.0
>>
>> -
>>
>> 0.0
>>
>> -
>
> So I take it, this is with faceting t
-
6727.0
-
6457.0
-
0.0
-
So I take it, this is with faceting turned off...
what are your timing results for a simple (not dismax query), perhaps:
"id:"
ryan
Sorry but I can't choose for that very sorry.
I will try to make it work with tomcat55, it used to work with solr 1.2
so it should be I don't know a parameter or ??? path or something that I
miss for importing?
thanks,
Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> Wouldn't life be simpler if you simply used S
yes I'm using 1.3
here are the contents of debug.. I'm only pasting the first explain since
the whole debug section is very long.
cleaning services
cleaning services
-
+((DisjunctionMaxQuery((about_us:cleaning^0.7 | zip:cleaning^0.7 |
(insurances:cleaners insurances:cleaning insurances:clean)
Hello everyone,
What is the generally accepted number of solr instances it makes sense
to run on a single machine given solr/lucene threading? Servers now
commonly have 4 or 8 cpus. Obviously the more instances you run the
bigger your JVM heap needs to be and that takes away from OS cache.
On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
and query times without faceting are... ?
solr's built in faceting is "simple" and has its limits. 15M is
higher than i've seen good faceting performance out of, particularly
multivalued fields.
Erik
Hi, My facet fields are multi valued
Wouldn't life be simpler if you simply used Solr's Jetty container
configuration, at least to start with?
Is Tomcat a requirement for some reason? You're struggling with
things that "just work" out of the box with Solr, it seems, and I'm
wondering why change around what works.
E
>and query times without faceting are... ?
>solr's built in faceting is "simple" and has its limits. 15M is
>higher than i've seen good faceting performance out of, particularly
>multivalued fields.
>
> Erik
Hi, My facet fields are multi valued and w/o faceting the query time is
about
On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
what is your actual query?
Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
I am doing faceting on 5 fields, no highlighting or anything else,
debugging
is also off. A basic query that I'm doing using dismax is 'cleaning
services' over
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chane is in the dictionary. For better or worse, Lucene skips words that
> are in the dictionary when OMP is false.
Ah, I see. I think we'll use OMP=true, which seems like a reasonable
setting anyway.
> Makes sense
>what is your actual query?
>Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
I am doing faceting on 5 fields, no highlighting or anything else, debugging
is also off. A basic query that I'm doing using dismax is 'cleaning
services' over 15 million local business records.
--
View thi
see the thread "spellcheck issues" going on right now between Jason
Rennie and me. In there is a small sample piece of code that does
spell checking through SolrJ.
On Oct 8, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Sunil Raj wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use SolrJ java client to do search and the basic
search wo
On Oct 8, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Jason Rennie wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Token: chane OMP: false
Oct 8, 2008 1:19:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
INFO: [spell] webapp=null path=/select
params={q=description
%3Achane
&spellcheck
what is your actual query?
Are you doing faceting / highlighting / or anything else?
On Oct 8, 2008, at 2:17 PM, Rajiv2 wrote:
Hi, thanks for responding so quickly,
6-12 seconds seems really long and 15 million docs is nothing on a
machine like this. Are you sure the issue is in Solr? How
Hi,
I'm having trouble with the spell check component of Solr 1.3. If I
request multiple extended results from spell check with a json result
format, the results get decoded into a single 'suggestion' array.
For example, for the query
http://localhost:8983/solr/spellCheckCompRH?q=beaar&sp
One other question: are you using real query logs or a set of
unique queries? With real query logs, the caches will warm up
after a while (tens of minutes) and performance will improve.
With a set of unique queries, you are mostly measuring Solr
cache misses. For us, that is about 4X slower, and w
Hi, thanks for responding so quickly,
>6-12 seconds seems really long and 15 million docs is nothing on a
>machine like this. Are you sure the issue is in Solr? How are you
>measuring the 6-12 seconds?
I'm looking at the value in the Solr response.
>Assuming it is Solr...
>How often are
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Token: chane OMP: false
> Oct 8, 2008 1:19:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute
> INFO: [spell] webapp=null path=/select
> params={q=description%3Achane&spellcheck=true&spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=false&spellcheck.e
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : req.getSchema().getQueryAnalyzer();
> :
> : I think it's in this analyzer that the undefined field error happens
> : (because for instance the field 'foo' doesn't exists in the schema,
> : and so it's impossible to fi
On Oct 8, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Rajiv2 wrote:
Hi, I need some recommendations w/ some issues I'm having w/ solr
search
performance.
Here is my index/hardware config:
- CentOS on 8 quad core xeon processors @ 3.16 Ghz
- 32 GB RAM
- Tomcat and JAVA 1.6
- Solr 1.3
~15 million documents .
- Index
Hi Jason,
Here's what I did:
1. Took your code and modified it to be that of [1] below
2. Set up your config, schema, etc. as per the EmbeddedSolrServer
paths in the code (a Maven like dir structure w/ src/main/resources/
solr/spell containing your configuration.
3. Ran the code. My output
I don't think you can search a 15 million doc index with any kind of
query complexity beyond a low freq query term in under .25 seconds
unless its a cached hit (in which case it still might not *quite* make
it under .25 every time either I'd think). Would love to be proven wrong
though You hav
Hi,
I am trying to use SolrJ java client to do search and the basic search works
fine with the code given below.
SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer( "
http://localhost:8983/solr";);
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery().
setQuery(searchKey).
Hello,
I am playing arount with WordDelimiterFilterFactory and run into some
problems...
When I search with "RedElectronicLed" I got this entries : "Red -
Electronic - Led" => Perfect !
But I don´t get "RedElectronicLed" entries in my DB :-(
Is there a chance I will get both ? "Red - Elect
Hi, I need some recommendations w/ some issues I'm having w/ solr search
performance.
Here is my index/hardware config:
- CentOS on 8 quad core xeon processors @ 3.16 Ghz
- 32 GB RAM
- Tomcat and JAVA 1.6
- Solr 1.3
~15 million documents .
- Index size on disk is about 22 GB
- 8 quad core xeon p
Hello,
I am evaluating Solr on a small cluster (~8 nodes) and will likely
deploy it to a cluster of ~128 nodes. Of course, configuration
management will be a big concern. Has anyone used Zookeeper for a
Solr cluster? I'm looking for any documentation, tutorials, etc. on
how to setup Zookeeper f
More information :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/tomcat5.5/webapps/solr/WEB-INF/lib# ls
README.committers.txt commons-io-1.3.1.jar
lucene-snowball-2.4-dev.jar
solr-lucene-highlighter-pom.xml.template
apache-solr-common-1.4-dev.jar comm
What you mean? except the name of the core which is books
because in solrconfig.xml I've no part about DataImportHandler.
thanks,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> Is the DataImportHandler defined in the solrconfig.xml for the "video"
> core?
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:26 PM, sunnyfr <[EMAIL
sorry it's ok ... it's book but the same error.
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> Is the DataImportHandler defined in the solrconfig.xml for the "video"
> core?
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:26 PM, sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've a wierd problem, my solr seems running.
Is the DataImportHandler defined in the solrconfig.xml for the "video" core?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:26 PM, sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've a wierd problem, my solr seems running.
> When i go to : http://solr-test.adm.bookclub.com:8180/solr/books/admin/
>
> I've a proper page
Hi Grant,
Here are solr config files (attached) and java code (included below) to
recreate the test case.
Jason
List> terms = new ArrayList>();
terms.add(new Pair("chanel", 834));
terms.add(new Pair("chant", 10));
terms.add(new Pair("chang", 8));
terms.add
Hi,
I've a wierd problem, my solr seems running.
When i go to : http://solr-test.adm.bookclub.com:8180/solr/books/admin/
I've a proper page :
Solr Admin (videos)
solr-test.adm.bookclub.com:8180
cwd=/data/solr SolrHome=/data/solr/books/
Even http://solr-test.adm.dailymotion.com:8180/solr/video/
it's ok ..sorry it was my fault.
forgot a jar.
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:04 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've updated solr 1.2 to solr 1.3, so I've generated the new .war
>> and add it
>> to tomcat like I used to do and it used to work.
>
> Define "gene
On Oct 8, 2008, at 4:04 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
Hello,
I've updated solr 1.2 to solr 1.3, so I've generated the new .war
and add it
to tomcat like I used to do and it used to work.
Define "generated the new .war"? Is there something wrong with the
WAR that comes w/ Solr? What steps did you
thanks for your quick response..
yes it was under the right path... However, the problem was fixed by changing
the ownership under index folder :)
thanks again
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgrading solr
>
Check again that you put the index directory in the right place. If
you're using the example config which comes with the release package,
it needs to be in BASE/example/solr/data/index.
On Oct 8, 2008, at 8:18 AM, dudes dudes wrote:
hi again,
I guess I'm doing something wrong,
I have
hi again,
I guess I'm doing something wrong,
I have downloaded the latest stable version...
untar it ,,, then I have copied /index directory from the old version to the
newer version version under data/
schema are the same... the old default one
I have start it via java -jar start... ( s
thanks, I will give it a try ,,, any probs will let you know :)
ak
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: upgrading solr
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:29:33 -0400
>
> I've upgraded solr several times from nightly to nightl
I've upgraded solr several times from nightly to nightly and then to
the 1.3 release without reindexing, with no apparent ill effects.
On Oct 8, 2008, at 6:12 AM, dudes dudes wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to upgrade to the latest Solr from its nightly version.
MY understanding is to re-in
Thanks for your update.
But in that case, while doing a full-import I am getting the following
error:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: QueryElevationComponent requires the
schema to have a uniqueKeyField
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryElevationComponent.inform(QueryElevat
Hello all,
I would like to upgrade to the latest Solr from its nightly version.
MY understanding is to re-index all the data after upgrading ..
Is there a way that doesn't require re-indexing all the data ? for example a
solr script or any third party tools ? or do I have to re-index all
Hi,
I've updated recently solr to the last version, but I've an error : How can
I manage language with this new version :
My bug:
Oct 8 11:32:13 solr-test jsvc.exec[29876]: Oct 8, 2008 11:32:13 AM
org.apache.solr.request.XSLTResponseWriter init INFO:
xsltCacheLifetimeSeconds=5
Oct 8 11:32:13 s
userID
I do not think there is a required attribute on uniquekey
By default uniquekey is required . If you do not want to make it
required remove the tag itself means no uniqueKey
--Noble
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:17 PM, con <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi guys
> I am indexing values from an orac
On Oct 8, 2008, at 3:43 AM, sunnyfr wrote:
Just a question, I've updated solr1.2 to solr 1.3 but didn't change
solrconfig.xml and schema.xml
is that a real problem ?
Personally, I'd strongly recommend (to the point of mandating) that
whenever going from one version of Solr to another that th
Hello,
I've updated solr 1.2 to solr 1.3, so I've generated the new .war and add it
to tomcat like I used to do and it used to work.
For information I didn't change conf files : solrconfig, data-config, schema
and scripts.
I just changed the name multicore.xml to solr.xml
And now I've this error.
hi guys
I am indexing values from an oracle db and them performing searching.
Since I have to search multiple tables, that is no way related to each
other, I have changed the uniquekey constraint in schema.xml to false.
userID
But when I do indexing, the values from the table that does not have
could it become a performance issue at some point?
JC R wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Does somebody have an idea why a new servlet session is created for each
> request to solr?
> thanks
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-session-tp19861244p19873952.html
Sent from the Sol
Hi,
Just a question, I've updated solr1.2 to solr 1.3 but didn't change
solrconfig.xml and schema.xml
is that a real problem ?
thanks,
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> Hi Sunny,
>
> Pretty hard to say what's going on here, other than you don't have the
> right Lucene libraries in your install
56 matches
Mail list logo
