On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:21:28 -0400
"Ian Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to preserve case for the data, but not for indexing, I have
> created two fields. One is type Author that is defined as:
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true">
>
>
Maybe I'm missing something (it's late) but why not just index+store? The
stored value will be the original and indexing can lowercase (as you set it),
so it's case-insensitive.
Also, does this actually work for you:
2 Tokenizers?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sem
We launched our Solr powered search a few weeks ago and have finished
up most of the tweaking. Would love feedback from the collective
wisdom of this crowd if anyone is willing.
Visit our site at http://www.vanns.com and use the search box at the
top of the page.
Also, for those who have
We just dealt with this same exact problem on our servers and I am
positive our last sync with 1.3 was after the 12th. We had to delete
and rebuild both our indexes on our servers today in fact. If it is
fixed, it does not work for us either.
- Tim Christensen
Vanns Inc.
http://www.vanns.co
What date did you get 1.3-dev?
I committed a patch for this on Jul 12th.
-Yonik
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:38 PM, sundar shankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>I am having to test solr indexing quite a bit on my local and dev
> environments. I had the
>
> true.
>
> But restarting my
In order to preserve case for the data, but not for indexing, I have
created two fields. One is type Author that is defined as:
and the other is just string:
this is used
: true.
: But restarting my server still doesn't seem to remove the writelock
: file. Is there some other configuration that I might have to do get this
: fixed.
I can reproduce these symptoms, are you seeing an exception like the one i
posted here..
http://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
: have solved it in their client. I can't modify Solr / Lucene code and I'm
: using Solr 1.2.
:
: What I have done is simple. Given a user input, I break it into words and
: then analyze each word. Any word contains wildcards (* Or ?) I lowercase
: it.
:
: While the logic is simple, I'm not c
david was faceted as 3... how one could map any of these personids
to the right david ??
3<...
3 is _not_ presonId, it is count of persons whose name is David...
I'm afraid i really don't understand your questions, particularly this
part...
: david was faceted as 3... how one could map any of these personids to the
right david ??
as i understand the info you've sent, you have 4 docs in your results and
3 of them have a firstname field containing "davi
My bad, sorry, I read too fast and skipped the fist necessary which is to get
solr.home through JNDI which you can't have nor set I presume... (which from
there would allow reading a multicore.properties, etc...)
I can only hope you are not running on Websphere (where the same kind of
sysadmin go
: It seems that spellchecker works great except all the "7 words you can't say
: on TV" resolve to very important people, is there a way to contain just
: certain words so they don't resolve?
I'm by no means an expert on the current machinations of the spellchecker
component/handler code, but th
Hello Henrib,
I have read the issue and it seems an interesting feature for Solr, but I
don't see how it address to my needs, as I need to point Solr to the
multicore.properties file.
Actually, I have already resolved my problem, hacking SolrResourceLoader so
that it can load a solr.properties fi
This should be one use-case for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-646 SOLR-646 .
If you can try it, don't hesitate to report/comment on the issue.
Henri
zayhen wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I have to load solr/home from a .properties file, because of some
> environment standards I have
My mistake, it is SOLR-676.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-676
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've opened SOLR-647 to fix this.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-676
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Shalin Shekha
I've opened SOLR-647 to fix this.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-676
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:50 PM, TomWilliamson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm trying to use localsolr (1.5) with the data
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 5:50 PM, TomWilliamson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use localsolr (1.5) with the dataimport handler but not
> having
> much luck. The issue seems to be that the _localtier dynamic fields dont
> get
> generated when adding docs via the dataimport, although they
> > Just on I'm working on the similar issue per customer request.
> > StatsComponent - it will return min,max,sum,qt,avg as follows:
>
> Seems like perhaps one should be able to return any arbitrary function
> (actually multiple), and sort by an arbitrary function also.
Sounds interesting. WRT a
I've a few ideas in mind on expanding JMX support but nothing in the
immediate future (for 1.3).
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Kashyap, Raghu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Thanks Ryan. For the time being this would probably work for us. However
> is there any plan in the future to expose a JMX MB
Thanks Shalin.
I am watching the JIRA since that is something we are very interested in
(Replication through JMX).
-Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 11:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: config
Thanks Ryan. For the time being this would probably work for us. However
is there any plan in the future to expose a JMX MBean to perform this
operation?
-Original Message-
From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
Yes, this would be the standard option, but actually we are a classified
ads website. Organizing each product in one document is a much better
option for us and for our customers, so that they can understand the
search results and find the place they want to go.
The facet approach is being tes
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Koji Sekiguchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just on I'm working on the similar issue per customer request.
> StatsComponent - it will return min,max,sum,qt,avg as follows:
Seems like perhaps one should be able to return any arbitrary function
(actually multiple), a
Just on I'm working on the similar issue per customer request.
StatsComponent - it will return min,max,sum,qt,avg as follows:
&stats=on&stats.field=price
10
30
20
60
3
WRT "stats", the component can output sum and avg, but not
sd and var. As our
Hi
i happen to download the latest code from svn, as i have to implement
multicore in our project.
wen i try to start the jetty server its giving ..
Logging to STDERR via org.mortbay.log.StdErrLog
jetty-6.1.3
Started SocketConnector @ 0.0.0.0:8983
when i try to access the admin page its givin
Hi, Svein!
Your approach is a great idea, even though it is not the best yet.
It would be even nicer if we could just tell SOLR to sum up everything
in a facet, already caching that... but this is great and it could work
nicely! Thank you very much. We will try that out.
This is more of a so
Hello guys,
I have to load solr/home from a .properties file, because of some
environment standards I have to follow for one client that insists I should
deliver Solr in one .ear containing its .war
The thing is: the same .ear in testing must the .ear in production, so I
can't change the env-entr
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:02:51 -0400
Stephen Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My issue with the logos presented was they made solr look like a
> school project instead of the powerful tool that it is. The tricked
> out font or whatever just usually doesn't play well with the business
> type
Stephen Weiss wrote:
My issue with the logos presented was they made solr look like a school
project instead of the powerful tool that it is. The tricked out font
or whatever just usually doesn't play well with the business types...
they want serious-looking software. First impressions are ev
I'm trying to use localsolr (1.5) with the dataimport handler but not having
much luck. The issue seems to be that the _localtier dynamic fields dont get
generated when adding docs via the dataimport, although they do if I add
docs via post.jar (xml document). Am i missing something simple here?
-
I don't know about JMX, but check the standard multi-core config...
If you are running things in multi-core mode, you can send a RELOAD
command:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore#head-429a06cb83e1ce7b06857fd03c38d1200c4bcfc1
On Aug 5, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Kashyap, Raghu wrote:
One of the r
The easiest solution would probably be to have a facet on the quantity
field and calculate the total quantity on the client side.
Svein
On 4. aug.. 2008, at 21.47, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Leonardo,
You'd have to read that "quantity" fields for all matching documents
one way or the other.
O
32 matches
Mail list logo
