: For date faceting, count missing the order doesn't matter either, and
: there it's given as a comma-separated list.
Either you are mistaken, or i don't understand your statement. date
faceting works just like field faceting -- no comma seperated lists.
: I think it makes sense doing everythi
Hi Grant,
> Can you describe your indexing process a bit more? Do you
> just have one or two tokens that you have "translate" or is
> it that you are going to query on every token in your text?
> I just don't see how that will perform at all to look up
> every token in some index, so maybe i
> Dallas, got money to spend on solving this problem? I
> believe this is something that tools like LingPipe can solve
> through language model training and named entity extraction.
Hi Otis,
Thank-you for your reply. I'm familiar with tools like LingPipe, but this
problem is actually *much* s
> Can you describe your indexing process a bit more? Do you
> just have one or two tokens that you have "translate" or is
> it that you are going to query on every token in your text?
> I just don't see how that will perform at all to look up
> every token in some index, so maybe if we have s
: It surely comes on the example, as I got this problem all times I get the
: example, and I have to remove the file multicore.xml or I get the error.
something is wrong then. if yo uare runing "java -jar start.jar" in the
"example" directory then "example/solr" will be used as your solr home
: Thanks for the suggestion. It didn't do anything.
FWIW: If you have a query (any query) that returns result when you use the
sstandard request handler, but does not delete any docs when sent in a
... update command, then that is a bug.
A reproducable test case filed in Jira would be apprecia
On 30-May-08, at 2:25 PM, Kevin Xiao wrote:
Hi
I am not sure if there are any discussions about this, I could not
find the search function in mailing list archives. :) Anyway, here
is my problem:
In my document, I have a hyperlink, say, breast cancer, but when I applied solr
highlighti
Hi
I am not sure if there are any discussions about this, I could not find the
search function in mailing list archives. :) Anyway, here is my problem:
In my document, I have a hyperlink, say, breast cancer, but when I applied
solr highlighting on search term 'cancer', that hyperlink becomes: c
On 29-May-08, at 11:22 AM, Bram de Jong wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't been paying close attention to the uniformity of URL
parameters, but if there is room for making them more uniform
(e.g. always use singular, always use comma
Some things to try:
- turn off autowarming on the master
- turn off autocommit, unless you really need it, or change it to be
less agressive: autocommitting every 50 docs is bad if you are
rapidly adding documents.
- set maxWarmingSearchers to 1 to prevent the buildup of searchers
-Yonik
On Fri,
I started running the test on 2 other machines with similar specs but more
RAM (4G). One of them now has about 60k docs and still running fine. On the
other machine, solr died at about 43k docs. A short while before solr died,
I saw that there were 5 searchers at the same time. Do any of you know
I'm sorry Shalin, but I still get the same Null Pointer exception. This is
my complete dataconfig.xml (I remove the parallel entity to narrow down the
scope of the problem).
Thanks again.
** julio
-Original Message-
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
The surname is used just as an example of a field.
The NullPointerException is because the same field "id" tries to use
it's own value in a template. The template cannot contain the same
field on which it is being applied. I'd suggest that you get the id
aliased to another name, for example using
On 30-May-08, at 6:45 AM, Stefan Oestreicher wrote:
Hi,
I've started to play around with Solr and I'm quite impressed with its
performance and features. However it seems to me that highlighting of
wildcard terms is not supported, which is somewhat disappointing.
Are there
any plans to suppor
You might try creating your whole transform as an SQL database view rather
than with the Solr transformer toolkit.
This would also make it easier to directly examine the data to be indexed.
Lance
-Original Message-
From: Julio Castillo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 20
Hi,
I'm just looking into transitioning from solr 1.2 to 1.3 (trunk). I
have some legacy handler code (called "AdvancedRequestHandler") that
used to work with 1.2 but now throws an exception using 1.3 (latest
nightly build). The exception is this:
HTTP Status 500 - null java.lang.NullPointerExce
Thanks for all the leads.
I did get however a null pointer exception while implementing it:
May 30, 2008 9:57:50 AM
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.EntityProcessorBase applyTransformer
WARNING: transformer threw error
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.Templ
I know people have made changes to the scripts in order for them to work
correctly on the UNIX variant that they are running on. Has anyone done
this for AIX?
Bill
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, tglawles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've found that the scripts provided with Solr do not run
Ok so with this patch you have something like this.
facet=true&facet.field=weight&f.weight.facet.statistical=true
This will bring the regular facet info, like:
5
2
1
and then will add the following:
3
1
1.5
0.7559289460
0.5039526307
So you get the max and min value as well as the CV
I guess, to generalize the idea, is to have some support for aggregation
functions. average anyone ;-) ? It would also be very useful to be able
to define the field that is being aggregated. For example, in a flight
reservation web site we developed we needed to show facets on different
flight
yeap. forgot to mention that.
well I didn't add support for multivalued fields yet, it might be
interesting.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Francisco Sanmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Don't forget to mention Jonathan that the complexity of the algorithm is
> not changed at all. It reads ju
Don't forget to mention Jonathan that the complexity of the algorithm is
not changed at all. It reads just once the value of the field for each
document selected, so no extra loops either in or outside the main loop ;).
Pako
Jonathan Ariel wrote:
Well, this is the first version of the patch.
Don't know what exactly I mean(t), and can't think of some appropriate
function, but my thinking was roughly: but what if we want to function foo, and
function foo has not been implemented. Can I write my own foo function and
plug it in somewhere? I'm theorizing though... I'll look at the patc
Dallas, got money to spend on solving this problem? I believe this is
something that tools like LingPipe can solve through language model training
and named entity extraction.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Dallan Quass <
This may be a long-term solution: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561
No code yet, though.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: tglawles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 20
Well, this is the first version of the patch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-588
Give me your feedback so we can make it better.
Thanks!
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Ariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you mean? Right now you send an extra parameter
> f.weight.f
I've done that already. All you need to do is to create your custom
request handler.
My handler, among other things, what it does is the following:
It receives a factor threshold, such as 0.85. This means that the score
of the first document returned will be the assumed as the "best"
matching
On May 30, 2008, at 10:22 AM, Dallan Quass wrote:
this may sound a bit too KISS - but another approach could be
based on synonyms, i.e. if the number of abbreviation is
limited and defined ("All US States"), you can simply define
complete state name for each abbreviation, this way a
"Chicago, I
I've found that the scripts provided with Solr do not run on AIX. From other
posts, it seems is due to the UNIX commands the scripts utilize. Does
anyone have any suggestions or experience on the best way to distribute solr
collections on UNIX systems where the provided scripts do not run?
--
V
> this may sound a bit too KISS - but another approach could be
> based on synonyms, i.e. if the number of abbreviation is
> limited and defined ("All US States"), you can simply define
> complete state name for each abbreviation, this way a
> "Chicago, IL" will be "translated" (...) in "Chicag
Hi,
is there some way of limiting the results above some fixed threshold?
thanks in anticipation
-umar
Hi,
I've started to play around with Solr and I'm quite impressed with its
performance and features. However it seems to me that highlighting of
wildcard terms is not supported, which is somewhat disappointing. Are there
any plans to support that or did I miss something?
best regards,
Stefan Oe
What do you mean? Right now you send an extra parameter
f.weight.facet.statistical=true and it will add statistical information to
the facet field response.
What I don't like is that I made the the changes to the SimpleFacet class
itself, it would nicer to have the ability to specify a different s
Was thinking... how about making those functions pluggable? Doable?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 3:56:14 AM
> Subject:
On May 30, 2008, at 2:40 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Right, the only actively developed Solr client is really Solrj.
All other ones are not well maintained - I don't recall seeing any
patches for any of them in the recent months
Ummm solr-ruby! It doesn't need any patches ;) It's u
Dallan Quass wrote:
I have a situation where it would be beneficial to issue queries in a filter
that is called during analysis. In a nutshell, I have an index of places
that includes possible abbreviations. And I want to query this index during
analysis to convert user-entered places to "stand
28 maj 2008 kl. 14.15 skrev Erik Hatcher:
On May 28, 2008, at 2:34 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
It would be perfect if all I had to do was to define a couple of
facet fields, a default text query field and some title/body/class
type to render the results.
Is there such a formula 1A JSP/servlet
I know that I would definately be interested in that. :)
/Jimi
Quoting Jonathan Ariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok. So I have a version of solr with a small modification to the SimpleFacet
class where you can send a parameter to tell that you want some more info.
It'll bring back a list with the ma
Well, thats what worries me, too.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see. That patch is not in Lucene yet, and it looks like *nobody* voted
> for it. If you like it, please vote for it.
> Personally seeing a mention of higher memory usage in that p
39 matches
Mail list logo
