Well, thats what worries me, too. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see. That patch is not in Lucene yet, and it looks like *nobody* voted > for it. If you like it, please vote for it. > Personally seeing a mention of higher memory usage in that patch's javadoc > worries me a little.... large index, lots of docs, lots of memory.. > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Uwe Klosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:26:44 PM > > Subject: Re: Sorting in different languages > > > > Thanks for the hints. > > > > I have been aware of the Collator. Actually a colleague of mine has > written > > a Collator based sorting Class for lucene. See: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-943. This was almost 2 > years > > ago and I only wanted to know if there is already a solution in Solr 1.3 > or > > Lucene. > > > > Thanks for all the responses. > > > > Uwe > > > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I don't have a very concrete suggestion for this, but maybe this will > lead > > > you in the right direction: > > > > > > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/text/Collator.html > > > > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/text/spi/CollatorProvider.html > > > > > > > > > You may also wish to bring this up on the Lucene java-user mailing > list, as > > > most of the sorting functionality in Solr comes directly from Lucene. > > > > > > Otis > > > -- > > > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > From: Uwe Klosa > > > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:36:39 AM > > > > Subject: Re: Sorting in different languages > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Alexander Ramos Jardim < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Well, > > > > > > > > > > One solution that I can see for this problem is having different > > > indexes > > > > > for > > > > > each language. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which way would that solve the sorting problem? > > > > > > > >
