Just in case anyone wants to know: I figured out that you have to set uniqueKey
stored="true" for highlighting to work. Thanks for everyone's help.
Thanks,
- Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Xiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apac
I forgot to mention that I made changes to schema after indexing.
pmg wrote:
>
> I have problem sorting solr results. Here is my solr config
>
>
>
> stored="true"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> search query
>
> select/?&rows=100&start=0&q=artistId:100346%20AND%20type:trac
I have problem sorting solr results. Here is my solr config
search query
select/?&rows=100&start=0&q=artistId:100346%20AND%20type:track&sort=alphaTrackSort%20desc&fl=track
does not sort track.
Don't understand what is missing from config
--
View this message i
Hello Chris,
> : If this is how it works, it sounds like the bq will be used first
> : to get a result set, then the result set will be sorted by q
> : (relevance)?
> no. bq doesn't influence what matches -- that's q -- bq only influence
> the scores of existing matches if they also match the bq
Thanks for the new jar. I ended up building solr+dataimporthandler but
an updated jar is a blessing for folks trying DataImportHandler.
I've updated the example-solr-home.jar on the DataImportHandler wiki
page with the latest code. Please let us know if you find any issues.
--
View this messa
: I'm not quite understanding how boost query works though. How does it
: "influence" the score exactly? Does it just simply append to the "q"
: param? From the wiki:
Esentially yes, but documents must match the at least one clause of
the "q", matching the "bq" is optional (and when it happens,
In v1.3, it is public. In v1.2, it is still protected.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:50:22 PM
Subject: Re: DocSet to BitSet
: That is more or less what I did. Once I found that function, it ju
: That is more or less what I did. Once I found that function, it just
: took a small patch to expose that functionality, and then the problem
: was solved.
I'm not sure why you needed a patch at all ...
SolrIndexSearch.getDocSet(List) and getDocSet(Query) are both
public methods. as is DocS
That is more or less what I did. Once I found that function, it just took a
small patch to expose that functionality, and then the problem was solved.
- Original Message
From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 12:32:56 PM
Su
: One of the primary reasons that I was doing it this way is because I am
: sending several filters, one is a big docset and others are BooleanQuery
: objects (products in stock, etc.).
: Since, the interface for SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListAndSet supports
: only (Query, DocSet,...) or (Query,
The HTMLStripReader tool worked very well for us. It handles garbled HTML
well. The only hole we found was that it does not find alt-text attributes
for images.
Also, note that this code is written as a Java Reader class rather than a
Solr class. This makes it useful for other projects. Given the
On 22-May-08, at 4:27 AM, gurudev wrote:
Hi Rong,
My cache hit ratio are:
filtercache: 0.96
documentcache:0.51
queryresultcache:0.58
Note that you may be able to reduce the _size_ of the document cache
without materially affecting the hit rate, since typically some
documents are much m
Julio, no worries, I'm 99% sure DIH is going to be in 1.3 and be in a nightly
in a week or two.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Julio Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, May 22,
John,
Solr already has some of this stuff:
$ ff \*HTML\*java
./src/test/org/apache/solr/analysis/HTMLStripReaderTest.java
./src/java/org/apache/solr/analysis/HTMLStripStandardTokenizerFactory.java
./src/java/org/apache/solr/analysis/HTMLStripReader.java
./src/java/org/apache/solr/analysis/HTMLStr
Hi,
Seriously, try making that monster document cache smaller. Sure, there will be
more evictions and more cache misses, but at least you will be less likely to
get OOMs :).
Oits
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: gurudev <[EMAIL
You mean you don't understand the difference. Here is an example of each:
1) field collapsing: http://www.google.com/search?q=lucene+in+action
Note how Google figures out that the first 2 hits are from the same site
(manning.com) and after showing those 2 hits offer "More results from
www.mann
Thanks Shalin,
I will add my vote to it that it becomes an integral part of the Solr ASAP.
I don't know why indexing dB content is not the highest on the project's
list.
I've seen other messages regarding the status of SOLR 1.3, so I'm not
holding my breath there. My request is that it makes it to
I don't know yet, so I asked directly in that JIRA issue :)
Applying patches is done something like this:
Ah, just added it to the Solr FAQ on the Wiki for everyone:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#head-bd01dc2c65240a36e7c0ee78eaef88912a0e4030
Can you provide feedback about this particular
I've updated the example-solr-home.jar on the DataImportHandler wiki
page with the latest code. Please let us know if you find any issues.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is scheduled to be released with the next release of Solr.
> Shouldn't
It is scheduled to be released with the next release of Solr.
Shouldn't be too long before it becomes part of the trunk/nightly
code. If you find it useful, please do tell us here or vote/comment in
the Jira issue. Bug reports are welcome too :)
You can also add yourself as a watcher to the SOLR-4
Question on the status of the DataImportHandler.
For the time being we are applying the recent patch.
What are the plans for incorporating it as part of the nightly build or at
least part of the subversion tree?
I just want to make sure that I get updates/fixes/enhancements to this
module when th
I think I'll give it a try. I haven't done this before. Are there any
instructions regarding how to apply the patch? I see 9 files, some
displayed in gray links, some in blue links; some named as .diff, some
.patch; one has 1.3 in file name, one has 1.3, I suppose the other
files are for both versi
Hi Alan,
Yes, it is a bit out of date. Please try using the SOLR-469.patch
directly from the jira issue
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:23 PM, alan. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I downloaded example-solr-home.jar and was experimenting with
> '${dataimporter.functions.escapeSql(item.ID)}'
>
> It didn'
I downloaded example-solr-home.jar and was experimenting with
'${dataimporter.functions.escapeSql(item.ID)}'
It didn't work so I looked in dataimporter.jar and noticed that it didn't
include classes for EvaluatorBag etal
I'm assuming example-solr-home.jar on
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImpor
That looks good to use those cache. Keep those cache will help improve
your search performance. Try the concurrent GC and see if you get better
result. Please let me know the results.
Best,
Yongjun Rong
-Original Message-
From: gurudev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22
-Original Message-
From: gurudev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 7:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: SOLR OOM (out of memory) problem
Hi Rong,
My cache hit ratio are:
filtercache: 0.96
documentcache:0.51
queryresultcache:0.58
Thanx
Pravesh
Ryan McKinley wrote:
>
>> [ ] Keep solr logging as it is. (JDK Logging)
>> [X ] Use SLF4J.
>
Can't "keep as is" since this strictly precludes configuring logging in a
container agnostic way.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-poll--Change-logging-to-SLF4J--tp17084684p1
On May 6, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
[ ] Keep solr logging as it is. (JDK Logging)
[X ] Use SLF4J.
But you already knew that...
Sorry, but I can't really understand the difference with facets.
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, the best documentation are really the comments in the JIRA issue
> itself.
> Is there anyone actually using Solr with this patch?
>
>
> Otis
>
Hi Rong,
My cache hit ratio are:
filtercache: 0.96
documentcache:0.51
queryresultcache:0.58
Thanx
Pravesh
Yongjun Rong-2 wrote:
>
> I had the same problem some weeks before. You can try these:
> 1. Check the hit ratio for the cache via the solr/admin/stats.jsp. If
> the hit ratio is very low
Actually, it's very easy: http://us2.php.net/strip_tags
I also store the data in a separate field with the html intact for
display. In that case, I use urlencode on the string.
David
McBride, John wrote:
Hello,
In my application I wish to index articles which are stored in HTML
format.
Up
Hi,
Maybe this one?
http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/
/Jimi
Quoting "McBride, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
In my application I wish to index articles which are stored in HTML
format.
Upon indexing these the html gets stored along with the content of the
article, which is undesirable.
Hello,
In my application I wish to index articles which are stored in HTML
format.
Upon indexing these the html gets stored along with the content of the
article, which is undesirable.
Do you know of any common way of parsing the text content from HTML
before adding to SOLR? I understand SOLR 1
Thanks, Mike. Sorry I was busy with something else. What does it mean "field F
must have an analyzer defined"?
My F defined as:
text is defined as:
Do you see
34 matches
Mail list logo
