Re: Multiple unique field?

Hi, Thank you for your reply In other word, can I set 2 unique key field? Thank you, Vinci hossman wrote: > > > : I want to set 2 field that are unique for different kind of searching. > Does > : it possible? > > not unless you enforce it yourself -- there isn't anything built in to > Solr

Re: sorting on aggregate averages

: I am computing a sorted rank list and returning a slice (for pagination) but : have to recompute the result for each request, although the actual q : parameter and fq would be cached but not the sorted list which I could cache : to reuse on subsequent requests. : : I might have a look at the cac

Re: Multiple unique field?

: I want to set 2 field that are unique for different kind of searching. Does : it possible? not unless you enforce it yourself -- there isn't anything built in to Solr to do this with the exception of the uniqueKey field. There is an UpdateRequestProcessorFactory hook that you can implement to

Re: Indexing a word in url

: Actually I want to use anything that is not alphabet or digit to be the : separator - anything between them will be a word (so that I can use the URL : fragment to see what is indexed about this site)...any suggestion? In addition to Mike's suggestion of trying out the WordDelimiterFilter, tak

Re: synonyms

Concretely, it would be good to know how your Portuguese Stemmer is different/better than Porter's. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008

Re: stored and indexed in schema

On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Vinci wrote: Thank you for your reply, It look like I will have some benefit but I will also lose the highlighter/summary functionary, it that right? Ya can't highlight what you don't have. So that's true. I think eventually it would be handy for Solr to allow t

Re: stored and indexed in schema

Hi, Thank you for your reply, It look like I will have some benefit but I will also lose the highlighter/summary functionary, it that right? Thank you, Vinci Erik Hatcher wrote: > > > On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Vinci wrote: >> I would like to ask, if I set a field to be indexed but not s

Re: custom request handler; standard vs dismax

I just chatted with Matt about this. It took me a few seconds (thinking this might be a browser caching issue without looking at the actual query), but the issue is that dismax does not support the *:* syntax. Removing the q parameter altogether does the trick, with it falling back to the

RE: matching exact/whole phrase

That was the answer I was looking for, I will try that one out Thanks Daniel -Original Message- From: Daniel Papasian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April 2008 16:03 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: matching exact/whole phrase Sandeep Shetty wrote: > Hi people, > > I am l

Re: matching exact/whole phrase

Sandeep Shetty wrote: Hi people, I am looking to provide exact phrase match, along with the full text search with solr. I want to achieve the same effect in solr rather than use a separate SQL query. I want to do the following as an example The indexed field has the text "car repair" (without

matching exact/whole phrase

Hi people, I am looking to provide exact phrase match, along with the full text search with solr. I want to achieve the same effect in solr rather than use a separate SQL query. I want to do the following as an example The indexed field has the text "car repair" (without the double quotes) fo

custom request handler; standard vs dismax

Hi, I recently started playing with the dismax handler and custom request handlers. When using the solr.StandardRequestHandler class, I get the response that I want; lots of facet values. When I switch to the dismax class, I get none. I've posted my request handler definitions here. Am I missing s

Re: How to handle multiple application?

You *may* want to consider MultiCore: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore but it may still be more appropriate to install multiple instances. On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:40 AM, Bhavin Pandya wrote: I have configured solr instance for one of my application in which there is one master server and 3

Re: Can We append a field to the response that is not in the index but computed at runtime.

thanks ryan seems like this would be helpful. will try it out. thanks again. -umar On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : > 2. Augment the documents with a field value -- this is a bit more > : > complex and runs the risk of name collisions with field

Re: Setting a Threshold of a sortable field to filter the result?

I'll let the example schema.xml speak for itself: omitNorms="true"/> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/> On Apr

Re: stored and indexed in schema

On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Vinci wrote: I would like to ask, if I set a field to be indexed but not stored, I can retrieved the document but cannot retrieve this field? That's correct. By definition :) If I have large field that I want to index but I am not suppose to show them to use

Re: Solved! Solr interprets UTF-8 as ISO-8859-1

That did the trick. I actually figured it out on my own 10 minutes after I posted to the mailinglist. Typical ;-) Thanks for the help anyway everybody! //Daniel Uwe Klosa wrote: You should set uriEncoding="UTF-8" in your application server. For tomcat you can do that in the server.xml. For Gla