Hi-
What is the element in an element that will load
this class:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.ChineseFilter
This did not work:
This is in Solr 1.2.
Thanks,
Lance Norskog
Rob,
Let's say it worked as you want it to in the first place. If the
query is for Thurne, wouldn't you get thorne (lower-case 't') as the
suggestion? This may look weird for proper names.
jds
Oops, sorry, didn't think that through.
The query to the spellchecker is not filtered through the field query
definition. You have to do your own lower-case transformation when you
do the query. This is a simple thing to resolve. But, I'm working with
international alphabets and I would like 'pro
lance,
thanks for the quick replylooks like 'thorne' is getting added to
the dictionary, as it comes up as a suggestion for 'Thorne'
i could certainly just lowercase in my client, but just confirming
that i'm not just screwing it up in the firstplace :)
thanks again,
rc
On Nov 28, 2007 8:11
There are a few parameters for limiting what words are added to the
dictionary. You might be trimming out 'thorne'. See this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckerRequestHandler
-Original Message-
From: Rob Casson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:25
think i'm just doing something wrong...
was experimenting with the spellcheck handler with the nightly
checkout from 11-28; seems my spellchecking is case-sensitive, even
tho i think i'm adding the LowerCaseFilterFactory to both the index
and query analyzers.
here's a brief rundown of my testing
: Yeah, I think that would work. Actually, I should be able to get all the
: request handlers and then look for instances of the req handlers that I need.
or configure reqHandler "B" with the name of reqHandler "A" that owns the
resource so it knows who to ask.
-Hoss
Yeah, I think that would work. Actually, I should be able to get all
the request handlers and then look for instances of the req handlers
that I need.
Thanks!
-Grant
On Nov 28, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I have an object that I would like to share betwe
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I have an object that I would like to share between two or more
RequestHandlers. One request handler will be responsible for the object
and the other I would like to handle information requests about what the
object is doing. Thus, I need to share the object between the
I have an object that I would like to share between two or more
RequestHandlers. One request handler will be responsible for the
object and the other I would like to handle information requests about
what the object is doing. Thus, I need to share the object between
the handlers. Short o
: I should have Googled better. It seems that my question has been asked
: and answered already, and not just once:
right, wildcard and prefix queries aren't analyzed by the query
parser (there's more on the "why" of this in the Lucene-Java FAQ).
To clarify one other part of your question
: I didn't know that trick.
erik is refering to this in the example schema.xml...
...but it sounds like you are having some other problem ... you said that
when you POST your documents with "extra" fields you get a 200
response but the documents aren't getting indexed at all correct?
I didn't know that trick.
Could you point me this documentation?
Anyway, don't you think that is something wrong in discarding all documents
without any warning? It's returning 200 return code without any other
content on the SOLRJ response to updates and don't log anything on the
server side...
I should have Googled better. It seems that my question has been asked
and answered already, and not just once:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-wildcard-with-accented-words-tf4673239.html
http://groups.google.com/group/acts_as_solr/browse_thread/thread/42920dc2dcc5fa88
On Nov 28, 2007 9:42 AM, C
Thanks a lot Hossman; this solved it for me.
Essential for me was to understand that I had to create a solr.xml file in
\conf\Catalina\localhost
see hereunder in the quote an example.
The docbase should point to the .war file somewhere on my system.
The value-attribute for the should point to a
I'm confused by some behavior I'm seeing in Solr (i'm using 1.2.0). I
have a field named "description", declared with the following
fieldType:
The problem I'm having is that when I search for description:deck*, I
get th
With Ultraseek, we switched to a dictionary-based segmenter for Chinese
because the N-gram highlighting wasn't acceptable to our Chinese customers.
I guess it is something to check for each application.
wunder
On 11/27/07 10:46 PM, "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's w
On Nov 28, 2007, at 8:41 AM, Daniel Alheiros wrote:
I experienced a very unpleasant problem recently, when my search
indexing
adaptor was changed to add some new fields. The problem is my
schema didn't
follow those changes (new fields added), and after that SOLR was
silently
ignoring all d
Yup, I do remember that happening to me before.
Is this intentionally so?
Ravish
On Nov 28, 2007 1:41 PM, Daniel Alheiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I experienced a very unpleasant problem recently, when my search indexing
> adaptor was changed to add some new fields. The problem is my
Just wanted to add the solution to this problem, in case someone finds
the matching description in the archives (see below).
By reducing the granularity of the timestamp field (stored as slong)
from seconds to minutes the number of unique values was reduced by an
order of magnitude (there are abou
Hi
I experienced a very unpleasant problem recently, when my search indexing
adaptor was changed to add some new fields. The problem is my schema didn't
follow those changes (new fields added), and after that SOLR was silently
ignoring all documents I sent.
Neither SOLR Java client or SOLR server
Hi Noberto,
JAMon is all about aggregating statistical data and displaying the
information for a web browser - the main beauty is that it is easy to
define what you are monitoring such as querying domain objects per customer.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov
Lance,
It does cover European languages, but pretty much nothing on Asian languages
(CJK).
- Eswar
On Nov 28, 2007 1:51 AM, Norskog, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WordNet itself is English-only. There are various ontology projects for
> it.
>
> http://www.globalwordnet.org/ is a separate w
23 matches
Mail list logo
