if use multi solr with one index, it will cache individually.
so i think can it share their cache.(they have same config)
--
regards
jl
if new data come in and drive index it, load new search it.
if more docs, optimize time will cost much, so can't do search like real
time.
so i think new solr instance only for newest information. the docs will
be ~10K.
if it arrive 10k, it should be closed and rebuild new instance.
(if we have m
it seems use somthing like ajax...
if so, it not what i wanna
2007/9/25, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I assume you mean something like this:
>
> http://addictedtonew.com/archives/145/wordpress-live-search-plugin/
>
> Take a look at how the search box works - is that what you mean?
>
>
>
Thanks a lot for your replies. I will follow the paginated search.
Thanks and Regards
Roopesh
--
DigitalGlue, India
I'm running 1.2.
Acutally, i am doing an optimize after I delete the indexes. (twice, as I
read there was an issue with the optimize). Do I need to close something
manually?
Here's my optimize code:
private void optimize() throws IOException
{
UpdateHandler upd
- Delete all index files via a delete command
make sure to optimize after deleting the docs -- optimize has lucene get
rid of deleted files rather then appending them to the end of the index.
what version of solr are you running? if you are running 1.3-dev
deleting *:* is fast -- if you ar
I've got an issue with my index files not being deleted. I have a cron job
set up to kick off the index process every 5 minutes (test box, with little
data). The process is as follows:
- Delete all index files via a delete command
- Loop through all the records in the database and index them
-
On 9/24/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorting on a tokenized field is definitely a no-no ... the only situation
> in which that will work is if your tokenizer produces only one token per
> document (ie: KeywrodTokenizer)
Yes, it works now. I have now based my sort field on the a
Yes, that would be the right solution. I'm not sure if, in order to use
french culture settings on xp, you would require corresponding changes in
culture settings for the solr instance.
Hope this helps.
-- j
On 9/24/07, JP Genty - LibertySurf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I use solrsharp
: late here. After a few hours of sleep, I think the problem is that I
: sort on a tokenized value. Without a facet filter, I have enough
sorting on a tokenized field is definitely a no-no ... the only situation
in which that will work is if your tokenizer produces only one token per
document (i
I assume you mean something like this:
http://addictedtonew.com/archives/145/wordpress-live-search-plugin/
Take a look at how the search box works - is that what you mean?
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 7
I use solrsharp on a french XP and I have problems with the float
conversion to text.
I modified ExempleIndexDocument constructor to force the "en-US"
culture.
CultureInfo MyCulture = new CultureInfo("en-US");
.
.
this.Add(new IndexFieldValue("weight", weight.ToString(MyC
Hi James,
Can you provide more information about what you are trying to do? By
real time search, do you mean you want indexed documents to be
available immediately? Or is a minute or two acceptable? Do all
users need to see them immediately, or just the current user?
We can better help
By design, it's not very efficient to ask for a large number of
results with solr/lucene. I think you will face performance and memory
problems if you do that.
On 9/24/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
> > > Hi Roopesh,
> >
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
> > Hi Roopesh,
>
> > I am not sure whether I understand your problem.
>
> > Is it the limitation of rows/pagination?
> > If so why not using a real high number (like rows=100)?
>
> > salu2
>
> Hi,
>
> Assigning a high number wi
Hi Roopesh,
I am not sure whether I understand your problem.
Is it the limitation of rows/pagination?
If so why not using a real high number (like rows=100)?
salu2
Hi,
Assigning a high number will solve my problem. (I thought that there will
something like rows='all' to do it)
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:34 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using solr setup in Tomcat 5.5 with python 2.4 using python client
> solr.py.
>
> When I search, all the results are not returned.
>
> The method call for searching is as follows : rows specifies the number of
> rows.
> d
Hi,
I am using solr setup in Tomcat 5.5 with python 2.4 using python client solr.py.
When I search, all the results are not returned.
The method call for searching is as follows : rows specifies the number of rows.
data = c.search(q='query', fl='id score unique_id Message-ID To From
Subject
Hi Chris,
On 9/24/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1)
> 2)
In fact both were typos in my email: the code is right. It was a bit
late here. After a few hours of sleep, I think the problem is that I
sort on a tokenized value. Without a facet filter, I have enough
results to have o
19 matches
Mail list logo
