Sounds good. Many thanks, guys!
regards,
-Hui
On 8/8/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 09/08/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Faceting ignores pagenation/startat/maxresults/etc.
> >
>
>
> This is correct, the facet information returned is based on the entire
>
On 8/8/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. I definitely cannot get this to work for terms that have spaces
> in them.
Did you try escaping the space with a backslash?
I think this should be made easier for future releases.
One way is something like
q=hey, no escaping required
http:
On 09/08/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Faceting ignores pagenation/startat/maxresults/etc.
>
This is correct, the facet information returned is based on the entire
result set matching the query rather than the document set returned by the
query. The start and row parameters have
On 8/8/07, Seema Khandkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi solr-users,
>
> If I have a float field (sfloat) stored and indexed in a solr index, how
> can I retrieve it within a plugin?=20
>
> Example:
> Document doc =3D solrIndexSearcher.doc(id);=20 String price =3D
> doc.get("price");=20
>
> The "p
Hi solr-users,
If I have a float field (sfloat) stored and indexed in a solr index, how
can I retrieve it within a plugin?=20
Example:
Document doc =3D solrIndexSearcher.doc(id);=20 String price =3D
doc.get("price");=20
The "price" string contains garbage value. I even tried to getField and
then
On 8-Aug-07, at 6:05 PM, Yu-Hui Jin wrote:
Thanks, Piete,
Yes, that's how I imagine I would do it now. Only that on a second
thought,
I think i need to issue a second query for the faceting params,
since the
original query would be paginated (with start and row params);
while for
faceting
Thanks, Piete,
Yes, that's how I imagine I would do it now. Only that on a second thought,
I think i need to issue a second query for the faceting params, since the
original query would be paginated (with start and row params); while for
faceting, we should only append to the original query withou
Yes. I definitely cannot get this to work for terms that have spaces
in them.
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
++
On Aug 8, 2007, at 2:5
The subject is the "Company name". If you are going to our web site
www.manta.com/mb we do need the "FAST" search for company name.
Thanks,
Jae
-Original Message-
From: Stu Hood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 6:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: R
No, I am merging any index at all. Just want to know how much faster than
non optimized index.
And how to do that.
Also, want to know exactly what the compound format optimization and
standard format one.
Here is the part of solrconfig.xml file which mentions Optimization.
From: Mike Klaas <
While we're on the subject of optimizing: Are there any benefits to optimizing
an index before merging it into another index?
Thanks,
Stu
-Original Message-
From: Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, August 8, 2007 5:16 pm
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Optimize ind
OK.
So a followup question..
?q=department_exact:Apparel%3EMen's%
20Apparel*&fq=country_code:US&fq=brand_exact:adidas&fq=hibernated:true
returns 0 results. Note the %20 in there for the space character.
?q=department_exact:Apparel%
3EMen's*&fq=country_code:US&fq=brand_exact:adidas&fq=hibern
On 8/8/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using the standard query handler to do searches like
>
> q=department_exact:"Foo>Bar>Baz>Qux"
>
> Now, lets assume I have lots of records, with various department
> trees...
> 1. Foo>Bar>Baz>Qux
> 2. Foo>Bar>Baz>Put
> 3. Foo>Bar>Somethi
Hello!
I've been using the standard query handler to do searches like
q=department_exact:"Foo>Bar>Baz>Qux"
Now, lets assume I have lots of records, with various department
trees...
1. Foo>Bar>Baz>Qux
2. Foo>Bar>Baz>Put
3. Foo>Bar>Something With Spaces>Elese
4. Foo>Totaly>Different>Tree
I'd
On 8-Aug-07, at 2:09 PM, Jae Joo wrote:
How about standformat optimizion?
Jae
Optimized indexes are always faster at query time that their non-
optimized counterparts. Sometimes significantly so.
-Mike
How about standformat optimizion?
Jae
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 5:07 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Optimize index
On 8/8/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, is
On 8/8/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, is compound index faster at query time?
Slower (but very slightly). A little less concurrency under heavy load.
-Yonik
So, is compound index faster at query time?
Jae
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Optimize index
On 8/8/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to optimize the index and what the difference between
> compound format and stand format?
Compound index format squishes almost all the files of a segment into
a single file. It's slower at index time.
-Yonik
You optimize by sending a command to the SOLR update
handler. I'm not sure about the different index formats though..
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
+-
On 8/8/07, Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I delete a record that does not exist, via delete-by-id, the status
> returned is 0. Shouldn't the operation fail?
No... delete means delete if it exists.
Due to how lucene works, to get good performance deletes are actually
buffered... wh
When I delete a record that does not exist, via delete-by-id, the status
returned is 0. Shouldn't the operation fail?
In fact, does any operation actually fail?
Cheers,
Lance
Does anyone know how to optimize the index and what the difference between
compound format and stand format?
Thanks,
Jae Joo
[QUESTION]
What could be the problem? .Or what else can I do to debug this problem?
In general 'luke' is a great tool to figure out what may be happening in
the index.
(assuming you are running 1.2) check your schema fields from:
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/luke?show=schema
Usin
Hello,
we are looking for a Lucene/Solr consultant in Germany. We have set up a
Lucene/Solr server (currently live at http://www.hitflip.de). It returns
search results, but the results are not really very good. We have been
tweaking the parameters a bit, following suggestions from the mailing
Hi all,
I think there might be something wrong with the date time rounding up. I
tried this query: "q=*:*&fq=listedDate:[NOW/DAY-1DAY TO *]" which I think
should return results since yesterday. So if today is 9th of August, it
should return all results from the 8th of August. However, Solr returns
Good day,
[BACKGROUND]
I am currently using hibernate-search for my web app, and now, I'm trying to
use solr to search over the index generated by hibernate-search.
[SCENARIO]
Since I was a newbie, I first tried creating a basic solrconfig.xml (
identical to the one in the example, except that t
In theory, you could store all your pages in a single document using a
dynamic field type:
Store each page in a separate field (e.g. page1, page2, page3 .. pageN) then
at query time, use the highlighting parameters to highlight matches in the
page fields. You should be able to determine the page
You could probably achieve this using faceting, however it would not be a
very efficient solution (although your multi-query idea isn't very efficient
either). Since facets return result sets in field sort order if you specify
facet.sort=false (setting that to try sorts the field by count), so you
aha，，，little 。
i think it is same as lucene until sometime i read something from mail list.
2007/8/8, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi James,
>
> Could you be a little more clear about what you are asking? What are
> you trying to calculate?
>
> FWIW, Lucene is a search library, Sol
Hi,
The question is about Solr used in an embedded context (without using HTTP
interface) and hence not using servlet containers.
Thanks & Regards,
Priya
Lance Lance wrote:
>
> Is the question whether or not you can run solr in two different servlet
> containers and index into the same data s
Hi James,
Could you be a little more clear about what you are asking? What are
you trying to calculate?
FWIW, Lucene is a search library, Solr is a search server that uses
Lucene.
Cheers,
Grant
On Aug 8, 2007, at 2:57 AM, James liu wrote:
if i wanna calc it by my method, something i s
Hello,Is it possible to structure lucene documents via Solr, so one document
coud fit into another one ?What I would like to do, for example :I want to
retrieve full text articles, that fit on several pages for each of them.
Results must take in account both the pages and the article from wich t
33 matches
Mail list logo
