Re: retrieving range of fields for the results

[Mike Klaas]

On 8-Aug-07, at 6:05 PM, Yu-Hui Jin wrote:

Thanks, Piete,

Yes, that's how I imagine I would do it now. Only that on a second thought, I think i need to issue a second query for the faceting params, since the original query would be paginated (with start and row params); while for faceting, we should only append to the original query without the pagination

params in order to get the correct faceting results.  Right?

Faceting ignores pagenation/startat/maxresults/etc.

regards,
-Mike