Yonik,
The title is of type text (tokenized). I will take a look to copy this into
a field that is not tokenized.
Hoss,
You're right. I think the time in the date might be different. I need to
check this.
Thank you both for the suggestions.
On 12/04/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
: > results that are filtered on a per user basis, for instance to remove
: > results that have already been viewed. I know I could post process
: > the results from Solr to do this, but am wondering if a better
: > solution is to implement my own request handler that takes in user id
: > info an
:
: qt=dismax&q=solr&start=3&fq=id:[* TO *]&fq=cat:[* TO *]
:
:
: Perhaps we should change it to something simple by default??? "q=solr"?
looking back at the log, i made it something complicated to demonstrate
the odd format requirements (similar to a URL ... but without URL escap
Oh wait... Andrew, were you always testing via "ping"?
Check out what the ping query is configured as in solrconfig.xml:
qt=dismax&q=solr&start=3&fq=id:[* TO *]&fq=cat:[* TO *]
Perhaps we should change it to something simple by default??? "q=solr"?
That solves the Jetty failure my
: You know, that's ultimately what I have done. My thinking is that doing
: field comparisons could be too intensive an operation anyway.
It would be hard to do if you were willing to use the FieldCache for each
of the fields, a FunctionQuery could be written for it fairly easily ...
but i'm sure
On 4/12/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For a given user, I would like to submit a search and return back
results that are filtered on a per user basis, for instance to remove
results that have already been viewed. I know I could post process
the results from Solr to do this, but
: Ahhh, are you using the dismax handler? I was using the standard
: request handler with a simple query "solr"
That would explain the "SolrException: undefined field text" he got using
Jetty, but not the orriginal NullPointerException.
that still worries me
-Hoss
Hi,
For a given user, I would like to submit a search and return back
results that are filtered on a per user basis, for instance to remove
results that have already been viewed. I know I could post process
the results from Solr to do this, but am wondering if a better
solution is to imp
Ryan McKinley wrote:
With a clean checkout, you can run:
$ ant example
$ cd example
$ java -jar start.jar
and things work OK.
But, when you delete all but the two fields, you get an exception
somewhere?
Well, I was working from my own directory, not the example directory. I
can give that a t
On 4/12/07, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I dropped your schema.xml directly into the Solr example (using
> Jetty), fired it up, and everything works fine!?
Okay, I switched over to Jetty and now I get a different error:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: u
With a clean checkout, you can run:
$ ant example
$ cd example
$ java -jar start.jar
and things work OK.
But, when you delete all but the two fields, you get an exception somewhere?
On 4/12/07, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> I dropped your schema.xml directly int
Yonik Seeley wrote:
I dropped your schema.xml directly into the Solr example (using
Jetty), fired it up, and everything works fine!?
Okay, I switched over to Jetty and now I get a different error:
SEVERE: org.apache.solr.core.SolrException: undefined field text
Are you sure you are using the s
I dropped your schema.xml directly into the Solr example (using
Jetty), fired it up, and everything works fine!?
Are you sure you are using the stock solrconfig.xml, etc?
-Yonik
On 4/12/07, Andrew Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So maybe I am doing something really dumb, but for testing purpos
So maybe I am doing something really dumb, but for testing purposes I
took a copy of the example schema.xml file and removed all of the fields
except for 2 to start with something really basic and it is throwing the
nullpointerexception again.
I attached the file if it is of any help
I am usi
As Chris as pointed out, there may be some non-printing character(s) in your
scripts.conf.
Bill
On 4/11/07, realw5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have not run bash -x, however I have run rsyncd-enable with -V which
shows
all the debug output. Here, is a snip of that. Note the "solr\r", yet in
m
: > q=content%3Atest;date+desc,title+asc
: >
: > When I try a sort just on date it works, also just on title is fine, but
: > when I try to sort on both at the same time, only the sort on date is
: Sorting works on indexed tokens, and hence doesn't really work on
: analyzed fields that p
You know, that's ultimately what I have done. My thinking is that doing
field comparisons could be too intensive an operation anyway.
Thanks,
George
On 4/11/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/11/07, George Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using the DisMaxRequestHandler.
:
http://localhost:8080/q=...&fl=StaticField1,StaticField2,%22s_Dynamic+Field+1%22
:
: I am guessing that Solr is parsing "s_Dynamic", "Field", and "1" as
: separate fields. Does anyone know a way around this? My initial testing
This is because the fl param does some pattern splitting to figure
I'm using with success Jetty 6.1.1 and solr.
What I did was starting jetty with:
java -server -jar start.jar etc/solr-jetty.xml
and putting inside etc/solr-jetty.xml the JNDI activation to use a single
jetty with multiple solr databases
named plus-config:
org.mortba
Re Jetty 6.1 becoming stable - it's getting there. I'm on the ML and see fewer
bugs reported. They are on 6.1.2rc3 I believe.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Then everything could work with only a JRE -
AFAIK, all of the newest servlet containers ca
The field names come from another source, most of which have spaces. So, it
looks like I will have to do a conversion between the space and some other
uncommon character.
Does anyone know the range of valid characters for field names in the Lucene
QueryParser? Obviously spaces are out of the ra
On 4/12/07, Kevin Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I discovered the issue. Some of my dynamic field names have spaces in them. If
I replace ' ' with '_', then it works fine. This really isn't a great solution,
since a '_' could be a legitimate part of the field name.
Do you not have any cont
I discovered the issue. Some of my dynamic field names have spaces in them. If
I replace ' ' with '_', then it works fine. This really isn't a great solution,
since a '_' could be a legitimate part of the field name. I tried enclosing the
entire field name with quotes, so the query is:
http://l
On 4/12/07, Thierry Collogne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to do a searchquery with sorting on multiple files, but I can't
get it to work.
I want to search first on a date, and if results have the same date, I want
them sorted by title.
This is my query :
q=content%3At
Hello,
I am trying to do a searchquery with sorting on multiple files, but I can't
get it to work.
I want to search first on a date, and if results have the same date, I want
them sorted by title.
This is my query :
q=content%3Atest;date+desc,title+asc
When I try a sort just on date it
25 matches
Mail list logo
