B
its fun and hip .. IMHO there is nothing wrong being cartoony.. Google
logo was a joke when it came out first by many many pr/branding
gurus..
On 4/7/07, Mohan Maruthai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A is good.
Doss.
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quick poll... Solr 2
A is good.
Doss.
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the us
B is a bit cartoony (someone said that earlier)..mainly because of the
letters, yet fresh.
A appears dated (an 80's look).
An alternate (C?) that retains the sunflare from B but changes the
letters to be more staid may add the required balance.
shridhar
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Quick poll... S
A
- Original Message -
From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 1:51 PM
Subject: Solr logo poll
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be furthe
I like B. Young!
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
B
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B?
B
-Bertrand (a Tex Avery fan ;-)
A
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-logo-poll-tf3537968.html#a9877009
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I prefer B.
B
A.
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
community like
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A) http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12349897/logo-solr-d.jpg
I like A. It's a bit more serious/professional looking.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:52 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr logo poll
>
> Quick poll... Solr 2.1
A
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr logo poll
A
On Apr 6, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
A
On Apr 6, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
community likes.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Yonik Seeley
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:52 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr logo poll
>
> Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a
> new logo may be a pa
B
On 4/6/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
community like
I prefer A. B seems too cartoon-y.
Bess
On Apr 6, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a s
A
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: Solr logo poll
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may
A.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
community likes.
A) http://issues.apache.o
A --wunder
On 4/6/07 10:51 AM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
> may be a part of that.
> What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
> tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of wh
Quick poll... Solr 2.1 release planning is underway, and a new logo
may be a part of that.
What "form" of logo do you prefer, A or B? There may be further
tweaks to these pictures, but I'd like to get a sense of what the user
community likes.
A) http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/1
Thank you - I don't know how I missed that!
Bill Tantzen
University of Minnesota Libraries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-626-9949 (office) 612-325-1777 (cell)
I guess the man's a genius, but what
a dirty mind he has, hasn't he? -- Nora Jo
This page on the wiki is probably your best place to start:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages
-Greg
On 4/6/07, Bill Tantzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There's no way to do that directly at the moment, you'll need
> to convert them to the XML format that Solr expects.
>
Would s
>
> There's no way to do that directly at the moment, you'll need
> to convert them to the XML format that Solr expects.
>
Would someone be willing to point me to a resource that describes this
format?
Cheers!
Bill
Bill Tantzen
University of Minnesota Libraries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-626-9949
On 4/6/07, Suresh Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would like to post PDF, DOC, TXT into SOLR to do the indexing.
There's no way to do that directly at the moment, you'll need to
convert them to the XML format that Solr expects.
The Lucene FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
Yes, each file needs to contain the license. Look at any .java file to see
what should go there and where.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTE
Whoops, typo: "...do the source code files need to contain the boilerplate
Apache license."
On 4/6/07, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I'm contributing new source files (separate project entirely) through
JIRA, so the source code files need to contain the boilerplate Apache
l
If I'm contributing new source files (separate project entirely) through
JIRA, so the source code files need to contain the boilerplate Apache
license/disclaimers and the like? This is new code and a new project (C#),
and the wiki page on contributions (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribut
I would like to post PDF, DOC, TXT into SOLR to do the indexing.
Suresh
30 matches
Mail list logo
