t the end of the week, so I’m not sure
> that I’ll have a lot of Slurm in my life, going forward J
>
>
>
> *From:* slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Stephan Schott
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 21, 2020 9:40 AM
> *To:* Slurm User Com
ity List
mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>>
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare
Stephan (et al.),
There are probably 6 versions of Slurm in common use today, across multiple
versions each of Debian/Ubuntu, SuSE/SLES, and RedHat/CentOS/Fedora. You are
more likely to get a g
>Hi everyone,
>I am having doubts regarding array jobs. To me it seems that the
>JobArrayTaskLimit has precedence over the Fairshare, as users with a
>way lower priority seem to get constant allocations for their array
>jobs, compared to users with "normal" jobs. Can someone con
ó:
>
>> Also, of course, any of the information that you can provide about how
>> the system is configured: scheduler choices, QOS options, and the like,
>> would also help in answering your question.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-bo
9:02 AM
> *To:* Slurm User Community List
> *Subject:* Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare
>
>
>
> Stephan (et al.),
>
>
>
> There are probably 6 versions of Slurm in common use today, across
> multiple versions each of Debian/Ubuntu, SuSE/SLES, and
> Re
, October 21, 2020 9:02 AM
To: Slurm User Community List
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare
Stephan (et al.),
There are probably 6 versions of Slurm in common use today, across multiple
versions each of Debian/Ubuntu, SuSE/SLES, and RedHat/CentOS/Fedora. You are
more likely to get
Stephan (et al.),
There are probably 6 versions of Slurm in common use today, across multiple
versions each of Debian/Ubuntu, SuSE/SLES, and RedHat/CentOS/Fedora. You are
more likely to get a good answer if you offer some hints about what you are
running!
Regards,
Andy
From: slurm-users [mail
