Also, of course, any of the information that you can provide about how the system is configured: scheduler choices, QOS options, and the like, would also help in answering your question.
From: slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com] On Behalf Of Riebs, Andy Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 9:02 AM To: Slurm User Community List <slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare Stephan (et al.), There are probably 6 versions of Slurm in common use today, across multiple versions each of Debian/Ubuntu, SuSE/SLES, and RedHat/CentOS/Fedora. You are more likely to get a good answer if you offer some hints about what you are running! Regards, Andy From: slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com] On Behalf Of Stephan Schott Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 8:37 AM To: Slurm User Community List <slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>> Subject: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare Hi everyone, I am having doubts regarding array jobs. To me it seems that the JobArrayTaskLimit has precedence over the Fairshare, as users with a way lower priority seem to get constant allocations for their array jobs, compared to users with "normal" jobs. Can someone confirm this? Cheers, -- Stephan Schott Verdugo Biochemist Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf Institut fuer Pharm. und Med. Chemie Universitaetsstr. 1 40225 Duesseldorf Germany
