[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread Davide DelVento via slurm-users
une 2025 13:52 > *To:* Hadrian Djohari > *Cc:* John Hearns ; Simon Andrews < > simon.andr...@babraham.ac.uk>; slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com > *Subject:* Re: [slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin > > > > > > *CAUTION:* This email originated outside o

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread Davide DelVento via slurm-users
rns > *Cc: *Simon Andrews , > slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com > *Subject: *[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin > > Or use Open OnDemand platform for the interactive Desktop. https: > //openondemand. org/ On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8: 37 AM John Hearns via > slurm-user

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread John Hearns via slurm-users
tunnelling) to try to think what else could be limiting here. > > > > Simon. > > > > *From:* Jason Simms > *Sent:* 06 June 2025 13:52 > *To:* Hadrian Djohari > *Cc:* John Hearns ; Simon Andrews < > simon.andr...@babraham.ac.uk>; slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com >

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread Simon Andrews via slurm-users
: John Hearns ; Simon Andrews ; slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin CAUTION: This email originated outside of the Organisation. Please help to keep us safe and do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread Burian, John via slurm-users
We’ve been using TurboVNC. From: Hadrian Djohari via slurm-users Date: Friday, June 6, 2025 at 8:41 AM To: John Hearns Cc: Simon Andrews , slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin Or use Open OnDemand platform for the interactive Desktop

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread Jason Simms via slurm-users
It may or may not be an appropriate solution for your use cases, but I second using Open OnDemand and its virtual desktop. It is FAR more performant than X11 through Slurm/SSH. *Jason L. Simms, Ph.D., M.P.H.* Research Computing Manager Swarthmore College Information Technology Services (610) 328-8

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread Hadrian Djohari via slurm-users
Or use Open OnDemand platform for the interactive Desktop. https://openondemand.org/ On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:37 AM John Hearns via slurm-users < slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> wrote: > Simon, I have had success in the past by using NICE DCV (now owned by AWS > but you can get licenses for on pre

[slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin

2025-06-06 Thread John Hearns via slurm-users
Simon, I have had success in the past by using NICE DCV (now owned by AWS but you can get licenses for on prem) https://www.ni-sp.com/products/nice-dcv An alternative would be VirtualGL Altair Access (though more likely to work with PBS!) https://altair.com/access\ On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 10:42,