Thanks for the suggestions – some interesting links to read.  We already have 
an option to run graphical sessions from the head node using Apache Guacamole 
which works well, but that still requires X11 to talk to the compute nodes.  We 
don’t have a full desktop stack on the compute nodes and just want to run 
individual applications.

The issue isn’t network bandwidth – I can launch two graphical instances, one 
via ssh and the other via srun at the same time on the same compute node and 
ssh is great but srun is terrible.  We do route through the head node (the 
compute nodes aren’t directly addressable) but the overall traffic on the head 
node is pretty modest.

I’m not really sure how the X11 plugin works (assuming it’s not just doing ssh 
X tunnelling) to try to think what else could be limiting here.

Simon.

From: Jason Simms <jsim...@swarthmore.edu>
Sent: 06 June 2025 13:52
To: Hadrian Djohari <hx...@case.edu>
Cc: John Hearns <hear...@gmail.com>; Simon Andrews 
<simon.andr...@babraham.ac.uk>; slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Re: X11 performance terrible using plugin



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the Organisation. Please help to keep 
us safe and do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the 
sender and know the content is safe.


It may or may not be an appropriate solution for your use cases, but I second 
using Open OnDemand and its virtual desktop. It is FAR more performant than X11 
through Slurm/SSH.

Jason L. Simms, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Research Computing Manager
Swarthmore College
Information Technology Services
(610) 328-8102


On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:40 AM Hadrian Djohari via slurm-users 
<slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>> wrote:
Or use Open OnDemand platform for the interactive Desktop.
https://openondemand.org/<https://url6.mailanyone.net/scanner?m=1uNWYr-0000000Ah4a-3xXq&d=4%7Cmail%2F90%2F1749214200%2F1uNWYr-0000000Ah4a-3xXq%7Cin6i%7C57e1b682%7C10448314%7C12652688%7C6842E4993D26BA50F5233A708F1CC36D&o=%2Fphtp%3A%2Fotsanendemnod%2Fgro.&s=EpUt8bBKDs4r2Hlhft-LHnAqgKk>

On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 8:37 AM John Hearns via slurm-users 
<slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>> wrote:
Simon, I have had success in the past by using NICE DCV (now owned by AWS but 
you can get licenses for on prem)
https://www.ni-sp.com/products/nice-dcv<https://url6.mailanyone.net/scanner?m=1uNWYr-0000000Ah4a-3xXq&d=4%7Cmail%2F90%2F1749214200%2F1uNWYr-0000000Ah4a-3xXq%7Cin6i%7C57e1b682%7C10448314%7C12652688%7C6842E4993D26BA50F5233A708F1CC36D&o=%2Fphtw%3A%2Fwts.iw.ospcn-crm%2Fsdutpovcd-ecin%2F&s=0xITGmLDGBVZzX4ADMnCbbAoi9o>

An alternative would be VirtualGL

Altair Access (though more likely to work with PBS!)  
https://altair.com/access\<https://url6.mailanyone.net/scanner?m=1uNWYr-0000000Ah4a-3xXq&d=4%7Cmail%2F90%2F1749214200%2F1uNWYr-0000000Ah4a-3xXq%7Cin6i%7C57e1b682%7C10448314%7C12652688%7C6842E4993D26BA50F5233A708F1CC36D&o=%2Fphtl%3A%2Fatsmrtaaco%2Fi.C5%25ssecc&s=hLyv7Imbgx1A9uZG5XigVjAQneQ>



On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 10:42, Simon Andrews via slurm-users 
<slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>> wrote:
On our cluster we’ve noticed that if we use the native x11 slurm plugin 
(PrologFlags=x11) then X applications work, but are really slow and 
unresponsive.  Even opening menus on graphical application is painfully slow.

On the same system if I do a direct ssh connection with ssh -YC from the head 
node the same applications are quick and responsive.

Any suggestions for what might be causing this, and how I can get the native 
x11 to have the same responsiveness as a direct ssh connection?

Many thanks

Simon.

--
slurm-users mailing list -- 
slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com>

--
slurm-users mailing list -- 
slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com>


--
Hadrian Djohari
Director of Advanced Research Computing, [U]Tech
Case Western Reserve University
(W): 216-368-0395
(M): 216-798-7490

--
slurm-users mailing list -- 
slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com>
To unsubscribe send an email to 
slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com>
________________________________

This email has been scanned for spam & viruses. If you believe this email 
should have been stopped by our filters, click 
here<https://portal-uk.mailanyone.net/index.html#/outer/reportspam?token=dXNlcj1zaW1vbi5hbmRyZXdzQGJhYnJhaGFtLmFjLnVrO3RzPTE3NDkyMTQzNjI7dXVpZD02ODQyRTQ5OTNEMjZCQTUwRjUyMzNBNzA4RjFDQzM2RDt0b2tlbj0zMWVmM2VlNzAzMjgxYTc3ZTNmZmQ5ZWFjYWVhNGM1NDMzNWI1MTI4Ow%3D%3D>
 to report it.
-- 
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com

Reply via email to