* David Baker [190925 15:58]:
> Thank you for your reply. So, in respond to your suggestion I
> submitted a batch of jobs each asking for 2 cpus. Again I was able
> to get 32 jobs running at once.
Dear David,
this was just meant as a test in order to support the assumption that
you do not hit
Dear Jurgen,
Thank you for your reply. So, in respond to your suggestion I submitted a batch
of jobs each asking for 2 cpus. Again I was able to get 32 jobs running at
once. I presume this is a weird interaction with the normal QOS. In that
respect would it be best to redefine the normal OQS si
Dear David,
as it seems, Slurm counts allocated nodes on a per job basis,
i.e. every individual one-core jobs counts as an additional node
even if they all run on one and the same node.
Can you allocate 64 CPUs at the same time when requesting 2 CPUs
per job?
We've also had this (somewhat stra
Hello,
I have defined a partition and corresponding QOS in Slurm. This is the serial
queue to which we route jobs that require up to (and including) 20 cpus. The
nodes controlled by serial are shared. I've set the QOS like so..
[djb1@cyan53 slurm]$ sacctmgr show qos serial format=name,maxtrespe
