* David Baker <d.j.ba...@soton.ac.uk> [190925 15:58]: > Thank you for your reply. So, in respond to your suggestion I > submitted a batch of jobs each asking for 2 cpus. Again I was able > to get 32 jobs running at once.
Dear David, this was just meant as a test in order to support the assumption that you do not hit some cpu/user limit with your 32 jobs. > I presume this is a weird interaction with the normal QOS. > In that respect would it be best to redefine the normal OQS simply > in terms of cpu/user usage? That is, not cpus/user and nodes/user. Yes, I think so. Maybe you'll also find this discussion from the Slurm bug tracker useful: https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4315#c1 Best regards Jürgen -- Jürgen Salk Scientific Software & Compute Services (SSCS) Kommunikations- und Informationszentrum (kiz) Universität Ulm Telefon: +49 (0)731 50-22478 Telefax: +49 (0)731 50-22471