Oh, and also, the number of text-attribute-changes in the
caption/hardstaus has also been increased to 256.
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=screen.git;a=commitdiff;h=e6a28cf8bfdac15faa6c267bf476ddcaddf48d67;hp=f33e5cdecb7bf3b6ae8e4a5c0ca394dd5a06a416
>
> Cheers,
> Sadrul
>
_
* Brian Kroth had this to say on [24 Dec 2009, 12:14:43 -0600]:
> Dustin Kirkland 2009-12-22 10:42:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
> > wrote:
> > > I don't think there will be much of a problem using dynamic malloc in the
> > > current code. However, it can be proble
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 07:29:47PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/screen/
>
> > screen-4.0.2-maxstr.patch
>
> It looks like MAXSTR has been increased to 512. It can still be increased
> more, of course. Is there a bug-report somewhere that reque
Dustin Kirkland 2009-12-22 10:42:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
> wrote:
> > I don't think there will be much of a problem using dynamic malloc in the
> > current code. However, it can be problematic for when we merge in the
> > scripting support. For example, a scrip
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
wrote:
> I don't think there will be much of a problem using dynamic malloc in the
> current code. However, it can be problematic for when we merge in the
> scripting support. For example, a script could store the window pointers
> somewhere
Hi
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> >> 45suppress_remap.dpatch
> >
> > I think this is incorrect. What keybindings are broken now? I think
> > 17b43961982caa5132d98544addc4de3f89103db fixes at least part of the bug
> > this patch tries to fix. I need to know if keys other tha
* Dustin Kirkland had this to say on [20 Dec 2009, 21:18:04 -0600]:
[snip]
> >> 33increase_max_winmsg_renditions.dpatch
> >
> > I think 256 is a bit too excessive. I am going to increase it to 128
> > instead, which I honestly think should be more than enough.
>
> Hmm, what's the actual cost? Som
Dustin Kirkland 2009-12-11 18:01:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Brian Kroth wrote:
> > So long as we're considering some changes, can I petition to have the
> > default MAXWIN increased from 40 to 99 (or higher)?
> >
> > We have a screenrc for our ssh bastion host that sets up >40 ssh
> > se
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
wrote:
> * Dustin Kirkland had this to say on [09 Dec 2009, 10:37:17 -0800]:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Dustin Kirkland
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hello everyone. Are t
* Miroslav Lichvar had this to say on [10 Dec 2009, 10:35:00 +0100]:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:19:00PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> > contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
> > non-trivial am
* Dustin Kirkland had this to say on [09 Dec 2009, 10:37:17 -0800]:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Dustin Kirkland
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
> > wrote:
> >> Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> >> contemplating a sort
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Brian Kroth wrote:
> So long as we're considering some changes, can I petition to have the
> default MAXWIN increased from 40 to 99 (or higher)?
>
> We have a screenrc for our ssh bastion host that sets up >40 ssh
> sessions by default and we always end up recompil
To Dustin/Sadrul:
So long as we're considering some changes, can I petition to have the
default MAXWIN increased from 40 to 99 (or higher)?
We have a screenrc for our ssh bastion host that sets up >40 ssh
sessions by default and we always end up recompiling screen to support
this.
Thanks,
Brian
* Miroslav Lichvar had this to say on [10 Dec 2009, 10:35:00 +0100]:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:19:00PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> > contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
> > non-trivial am
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:19:00PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
> non-trivial amount of work to do, though, so no ETA yet), and was
> thinking if this list i
> Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
> non-trivial amount of work to do, though, so no ETA yet), and was
> thinking if this list is the best place to reach the packagers.
Hi. I maintain screen in Cygw
* Dustin Kirkland had this to say on [09 Dec 2009, 10:37:17 -0800]:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Dustin Kirkland
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
> > wrote:
> >> Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> >> contemplating a sort
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
> wrote:
>> Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
>> contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
>> non-trivial amount of work to do, t
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
wrote:
> Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
> contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
> non-trivial amount of work to do, though, so no ETA yet), and was
> thinking if this list is the be
Hello everyone. Are there any screen packagers on this list? I am
contemplating a sort of a beta-release somewhat soon-ish (still
non-trivial amount of work to do, though, so no ETA yet), and was
thinking if this list is the best place to reach the packagers.
Cheers,
Sadrul
20 matches
Mail list logo
