Dustin Kirkland <kirkl...@canonical.com> 2009-12-22 10:42: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury > <ima...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think there will be much of a problem using dynamic malloc in the > > current code. However, it can be problematic for when we merge in the > > scripting support. For example, a script could store the window pointers > > somewhere, and use them in a callback. A dynamic malloc will either cause > > this to crash, or require complicated checks in the script (or the script > > loaders). > > > > So to keep it 'forward-compatible', perhaps increase the default limit to > > 100, and allow increasing the limit only when creating a new session. How > > does that sound? > > I think 100 sounds reasonable.
Agreed. I also like the idea of being able to specify it at session creation time. Thanks, Brian _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list screen-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
