Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3 on OS X

2011-02-14 Thread Israel Chauca F.
On Feb 14, 2011, at 7:43 PM, Adrian Petrescu wrote: > Hi scid-users, > > I decided to try running Scid on my OS X 10.6.6 machine. At first I tried > using the new 4.3 dmg binary, but there seems to be something corrupt about > it, because when I try to mount the .dmg I get a "not recognized" err

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3 on OS X

2011-02-14 Thread Steve Steinitz
Hi Adrian, I confirm that the dmg on sourceforge is corrupt. However, Israel Chauca Fuentes has provided a dmg that works at his "gadgets" site: http://cachivaches.chauca.net/scid/ Thank you, as always, Senor Fuentes. I haven't yet tried building from source. Cheers, Steve

[Scid-users] Scid 4.3 on OS X

2011-02-14 Thread Adrian Petrescu
Hi scid-users, I decided to try running Scid on my OS X 10.6.6 machine. At first I tried using the new 4.3 dmg binary, but there seems to be something corrupt about it, because when I try to mount the .dmg I get a "not recognized" error. Okay, fair enough, so I went and checked out the source fro

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3

2011-02-14 Thread Joost 't Hart
On 02/14/2011 08:09 PM, Mikhail Kalenkov wrote: Hi, >>> Any way you have to include these bases back or fix >>> Makefile because it now fails to install scid due to the following >>> line >>> >>> install -m 666 ./bases/*.* $(DESTDIR)$(SHAREDIR)/bases/ >> Hm, that's a fair one. >> I suggest to rem

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3

2011-02-14 Thread Mikhail Kalenkov
>> Any way you have to include these bases back or fix >> Makefile because it now fails to install scid due to the following >> line >> >> install -m 666 ./bases/*.* $(DESTDIR)$(SHAREDIR)/bases/ > > Hm, that's a fair one. > I suggest to remove the bases from the installation part of the makefile, >

Re: [Scid-users] Preferred reports sequential numbers

2011-02-14 Thread Alexander Wagner
On 02/14/11 14:30, Marco Saba wrote: Hi! > Thank you. I was able to concatenate all pdf files using: > $ pdftk *.pdf cat output combined.pdf Well, there are a host of options to concatenate stuff of course. > Now the problem is the page numbering. Can I have SCID > generate all LaTEX reports wi

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3

2011-02-14 Thread Joost 't Hart
On 02/14/2011 09:02 AM, Mikhail Kalenkov wrote: Hi, > Great news! > > I found that source tarball does not contain training bases (endings, > matein1, matein2, matein3, matein4andmore, tactics... ) anymore. Is > it intentional? At least partly :-) We discussed these briefly, but we do not have

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3

2011-02-14 Thread Mario Lacunza
Yes I confirm that in my ubuntu 10.04 64bits... but when I load my SCID it tell me is 4.3 is correct? Saludos / Best regards Mario Lacunza Email:: mlacu...@gmail.com Personal Website:: http://www.lacunza.biz/ OpenOffice.org:: http://es.openoffice.org/ OpenOffice.org Perú:: http://openoffic

[Scid-users] Download

2011-02-14 Thread Francesco Bianco
Hi the sf project homepage (http://sourceforge.net/projects/scid/) report the download of FIDE foto related to an event did it's ok? i think best promote win32 edition! when start a Scid Official site re-engeeniering? I Love Scid! -- *Ing. Francesco Bianco*

Re: [Scid-users] Scid 4.3

2011-02-14 Thread Mikhail Kalenkov
Great news! I found that source tarball does not contain training bases (endings, matein1, matein2, matein3, matein4andmore, tactics... ) anymore. Is it intentional? Any way you have to include these bases back or fix Makefile because it now fails to install scid due to the following line insta